I am in—either point.
1) Byzantine 963 with Armenian allies
2)Armenian 885 with Byzantine 963 allies
3)Fatimids
4)Abbasids 794-814

Thanks!

We will make an announcement once everything is finalised but it will be about general systems and not details. Partly as these could help people to game the system and partly as they are going to be subject to change without notice. The issue is as we're reviewing different games there are differe...

Thanks to Pete
Merry Christmas to everyone.

Aetius have not until now created the game.

Thanks

Hello,
While I receive without problem emails when my opponent plays his turn in other Slitherine's games (eg. Field of Glory 2), I do not receive them in Sanctus Reach. Do I have to do something about this ?

Will we have another one?

Guys I am sorry but I will be able to start the games on Monday. Sorry for the delay.

Hello,

I will attacke olins' XIII area using my Armenian Allies.
Provinces at stake (XIII and XII vs V and XVI).

My dear friend, Sadly the "update" of FoG1 in Unity in fact destroyed the game. There are still some players who play the game (look at the forum for fog1http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=84 ) but since slitherine sells the non-working unity version it is truly hard now to enjoy the ga...

deeter wrote: ↑

Wed Nov 11, 2020 7:51 pm

Anarchy charges were not optional and quite infuriating. I don't miss them.
Deeter

But think about it. It was one of the main reasons that the camping attitude did not create any problem back then. Also, it was realistic (historical speaking)..Omg, i miss so much FoG1...

Just stop here to say that I miss the do not evade option of the FoG1

My Romans defeated olin0111's Romans, 62-47%.
Thanks for the game.

Division C

NikiforosFokas (Persians) defeated ahuyton (Indians) 52-23%

Some rallies in the last turn gave me the victory when things had started to turn around.
Thanks for the nice game.

Achaemenid Persian 545-481 BC
Assyrian 681-609 BC
Lydian 687-551 BC
Egyptian 664-571
Median 626-550 BC

Thanks!!!

ahuyton wrote: ↑

Thu Oct 29, 2020 4:18 pm

Division C
Indian 500 BC-319 AD v Persian 545-481 BC (Persian invasion 518-516 BC)

ahuyton v NikiforosFokas

Challenge posted and pm sent

Dear ahuyton,
I have not received a pm. If you do not mind please post here the password or try to send again the pm.
Thanks

Hi, I have to say, I found the format really good. To be able to play many armies rather than sticking to one was great. If it came to a vote I would vote for it in other leagues. I think determining the scenarios prior to the games starting was the best way of doing it. BW Ian So I just see that I...

Maybe t is not the right place to tell it Peter, but i allow me: I enjoy Biblical sooo much. I have zero interest in this historical period (i am a medieval guy) but I prefer to play paired matches even if that means that I have to play this section. I would love to see this mode to the early mediev...

To olin: No allies this time
To kronenblat: Oh oh for the provinces.