Search found 475 matches

by SLancaster
Sun Oct 25, 2020 4:08 pm
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: Warg1 has won Biblical Division D!
Replies: 1
Views: 34

Re: Warg1 has won Biblical Division D!

Well done to Warg. He is a bit of a machine these days. Aetius has opportunities for revenge in the other divisions.
by SLancaster
Sat Oct 24, 2020 7:13 pm
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: Classical Antiquity: winners post your result here . . .
Replies: 104
Views: 2353

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your result here . . .

Division B SLancaster (Roman 199-106 BC with Greek 227-146 BC allies) defeated Trogilus (Syracusan 280-211 BC with Carthaginian 235-146 BC allies). 43-12 . A tough game against a good opponent. Some shuffling around and then we committed midway through the battle. Best of luck in your next games!
by SLancaster
Fri Oct 23, 2020 2:25 am
Forum: Field of Glory II
Topic: Tournament Round I Army Comparison Sheet
Replies: 17
Views: 281

Re: Tournament Round I Army Comparison Sheet

Having played half-a-dozen practice games, abet vs the AI, these are my initial observations. 1. The Syracusians have a significant advantage in heavy infantry, a max of 20 vs Carth. max of 11. 2. The Syracusian veteran hopolites are almost as good as the veteran African spears, especially in light...
by SLancaster
Fri Oct 23, 2020 2:15 am
Forum: Field of Glory II
Topic: Tournament Round I Army Comparison Sheet
Replies: 17
Views: 281

Re: Tournament Round I Army Comparison Sheet

Yes, I have already mentioned to Richard that he didn’t use 1200 points for his army. But, his observations about the units are still valid and useful.
by SLancaster
Thu Oct 22, 2020 6:56 pm
Forum: Field of Glory II
Topic: Tournament Round I Army Comparison Sheet
Replies: 17
Views: 281

Re: Tournament Round I Army Comparison Sheet

I am not in this tournament. I mainly play in the Digital League. Carthage is the better list - the Veteran African Spearmen will do a lot of damage. Carthage also has more cavalry plus chariots that it can field. Someone else can talk about the Heavy Chariots.. they might be good. Richard started d...
by SLancaster
Thu Oct 22, 2020 9:49 am
Forum: Field of Glory II
Topic: Tournament Round I Army Comparison Sheet
Replies: 17
Views: 281

Re: Tournament Round I Army Comparison Sheet

Good luck in the tournament.
by SLancaster
Wed Oct 21, 2020 11:25 am
Forum: Field of Glory II: Tech Support
Topic: MP Turns Not Loading as Normal
Replies: 24
Views: 396

Re: MP Turns Not Loading as Normal

October 21st

I just took turns in two games and there was a long wait to upload the turns. Both took 1 min 40 secs. Server is sluggish today.
by SLancaster
Tue Oct 20, 2020 3:33 pm
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Replies: 101
Views: 2008

Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Div C

SLancaster (Roman 197-284 AD) challenges Garokan (Bosporan 11BC-375 AD with Roman 24 BC-196 AD allies).

Password is tony. PM sent.
by SLancaster
Tue Oct 20, 2020 3:28 pm
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Replies: 101
Views: 2008

Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Div C

SLancaster (Roman 197-284 AD) challenges Bluefin (Alan 25-650 AD).

Password is tony. PM sent.
by SLancaster
Mon Oct 19, 2020 7:30 pm
Forum: News & Announcements
Topic: Field of Glory II: Medieval is coming soon
Replies: 106
Views: 7002

Re: Field of Glory II: Medieval is coming soon

I agree with what most are saying: unit depictions look colourful and attractive (especially the cavalry) while the landscape could just do with a little alteration. Some scrubs, shades, and grass in the open green patches would be nice.

Overall, looks impressive, though.
by SLancaster
Sun Oct 18, 2020 1:22 pm
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: Classical Antiquity: winners post your result here . . .
Replies: 104
Views: 2353

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your result here . . .

Division B SLancaster (Roman 199-106 BC with Greek 227-146 BC allies) defeated Morbio (Carthaginian (Hannibal in Italy) 216-203BC with Samnite 355-272 BC allies). 62-39 . A very nice opponent. He played well and didn't get the rallies at the end. Carthaginian 216 BC is a tough army so I am pleased ...
by SLancaster
Sun Oct 18, 2020 8:31 am
Forum: Field of Glory II
Topic: Fallbacks
Replies: 11
Views: 346

Re: Fallbacks

Okay, thanks for the clarification.
by SLancaster
Sat Oct 17, 2020 7:49 pm
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: Classical Antiquity: winners post your result here . . .
Replies: 104
Views: 2353

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your result here . . .

Division B SLancaster (Roman 199-106 BC with Greek 227-146 BC allies) defeated lunecastle (Lysimachid 320-281 BC with Thracian(Hellenistic) 350-281 BC allies). 60-41 . First win for my Classical Romans and it wasn't easy. Lunecastle set up very well with his skirmishers, light cav and artillery. Ro...
by SLancaster
Sat Oct 17, 2020 7:10 pm
Forum: Field of Glory II
Topic: Fallbacks
Replies: 11
Views: 346

Re: Fallbacks

We don't have any information on fallbacks causing double drops. If anyone knows or has seen the code then let us know. At the moment I am assuming that a roll of 2 will cause a double drop.
by SLancaster
Sat Oct 17, 2020 10:15 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: The Rally Point (discussion and questions)
Replies: 1790
Views: 99617

The Rally Point (discussion and questions)

In the other example I was annoyed because I was specifically told that after two units routed I would go over 25% and it was game over. Of course a mistake was made. But, it altered the result because I wasted five turns wondering what was going on. In the end I missed out on the win by 2% because...
by SLancaster
Sat Oct 17, 2020 6:40 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: The Rally Point (discussion and questions)
Replies: 1790
Views: 99617

Re: Gamesmanship in the Digital League

I have had two games where I felt there was quite a lot of gamesmanship or misinformation (to put it nicely) going on. First game I am fighting Mr X. I am about to get over 25% and he says to me, "Good game, you will win in a few turns when you go over 25%". The map was bad with mountains and fores...
by SLancaster
Fri Oct 16, 2020 10:53 am
Forum: News & Announcements
Topic: Field of Glory II: Medieval is coming soon
Replies: 106
Views: 7002

Re: Field of Glory II: Medieval is coming soon

Does anyone have the link to the Twitch preview? I have tried searching but couldn’t find anything. https://www.twitch.tv/videos/771108778?t=01h01m59s Enjoy! Thanks. I have shared that with friends. Much appreciated. PS Edmund is from Jersey like me.. was funny to hear him suddenly mention the isla...
by SLancaster
Fri Oct 16, 2020 9:49 am
Forum: News & Announcements
Topic: Field of Glory II: Medieval is coming soon
Replies: 106
Views: 7002

Re: Field of Glory II: Medieval is coming soon

Does anyone have the link to the Twitch preview? I have tried searching but couldn’t find anything.
by SLancaster
Fri Oct 16, 2020 7:06 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Replies: 85
Views: 2002

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Division C

SLancaster (Roman 197-284 AD) defeated edb1815 (Arab City 300-633 AD with Sassanid 477-590 AD allies). 60-47.

Very hard battle. Edb pushed me all the way and I am sure he will do well in this division. My Roman line held out for long enough to push back the hordes!
by SLancaster
Thu Oct 15, 2020 7:48 pm
Forum: Field of Glory II
Topic: Fallbacks
Replies: 11
Views: 346

Re: Fallbacks

Notes: So looking at the manual: Frag is -2, Threatened flank is -1, 25% losses -1, 50% losses -1, Hvy foot +1, General within 4 sq +1. 6 needed to pass on 2 dice. Pretty close to TT game. So pike unit with a general would be evens depending on flanks and casualties. Of course the table may have cha...

Go to advanced search