Search found 8 matches

by DieterNohlen
Thu May 11, 2017 9:31 pm
Forum: Afghanistan '11
Topic: Beautiful game, but a bit too easy
Replies: 22
Views: 4882

Re: Beautiful game, but a bit too easy

Thank you for your support ! :D Next is the British DLC , new vehicles , campaign, uniform etc. Will another level of difficulty to the Skirmish options :shock: The next DLC, as well as the next asymmetric warfare games in the pipeline, sound absolutely awsome, I'm so looking forward to the new mat...
by DieterNohlen
Thu May 11, 2017 5:15 pm
Forum: Afghanistan '11
Topic: Beautiful game, but a bit too easy
Replies: 22
Views: 4882

Re: Beautiful game, but a bit too easy

I think that on elite difficulty level the Taliban should be much tougher So the majority of users and the Publisher have mentioned to me the game is too difficult, I thought as I have played it soooo many times that it wasn't, getting the balance right for every level of player is not an easy task...
by DieterNohlen
Tue May 09, 2017 2:09 pm
Forum: Afghanistan '11
Topic: Beautiful game, but a bit too easy
Replies: 22
Views: 4882

Re: Beautiful game, but a bit too easy

Well, as someone who still finds it not easy at all, even on normal difficulty... perhaps you can share your tips with the rest of us on how you managed to crack the winning formula? :D Subsim, that's precisely the point, once you crack the winning formula, the game is not much of a challenge, even...
by DieterNohlen
Fri May 05, 2017 8:11 pm
Forum: Afghanistan '11
Topic: Beautiful game, but a bit too easy
Replies: 22
Views: 4882

Beautiful game, but a bit too easy

The concept of "asymmetric warfare" created by this game and its predecessor Vietnam '65 is pure genius, and the realization is beautiful in terms of graphics, gameplay, everything. However, and I've seen this said elsewhere in the forums: even at the highest difficulty levels, it's rather easy to d...
by DieterNohlen
Mon Apr 24, 2017 9:07 pm
Forum: Afghanistan '11
Topic: Why attack with troops?
Replies: 12
Views: 1758

Re: Why attack with troops?

Excellent, now it's clear, more than an ambush, it's co-ordinated, carefully planned attack on an enemy that has been detected and located. With that logic, it makes perfect sense, now I can keep using this kind of attack with a clear conscience, thank you!!
by DieterNohlen
Sun Apr 23, 2017 5:18 pm
Forum: Vietnam '65
Topic: VIETNAM 65 SUGESTION - MULTIPLAYER
Replies: 3
Views: 1860

Re: VIETNAM 65 SUGESTION - MULTIPLAYER

I don't think you need a survey, everybody would love multiplayer!!! Who can be against multiplayer, that sounds like a joke, who was that guy voting against multiplayer anyway? Some contrarian soul obviously...
by DieterNohlen
Sun Apr 23, 2017 5:15 pm
Forum: Pike & Shot
Topic: New Pike and Shot game?
Replies: 19
Views: 5351

Re: New Pike and Shot game?

Yes, Rome period would be great. But Seven Years War with some strategic dimension would be fantastic. And what about Napoleonics? A Napoleonic Game with this engine would be great...
by DieterNohlen
Sun Apr 23, 2017 2:55 pm
Forum: Afghanistan '11
Topic: Why attack with troops?
Replies: 12
Views: 1758

Re: Why attack with troops?

Very good point, I always attack with infrantry stopping 1 hex away and then setting the troop in ambush, so there is no risk of suffering losses at all. It's an exploit, certainly, but I think this could easily be fixed in some future patch...

Go to advanced search