Search found 61 matches

by Zardoz02
Sat Aug 31, 2019 10:45 am
Forum: Field of Glory II
Topic: Armored Horse Archers?
Replies: 11
Views: 579

Re: Armored Horse Archers?

Nooo... not like that at all! Like you find in a competition game where the other guy is choosing his army and making his troop selection based on the possibility of having to fight horse archer armies!
by Zardoz02
Sat Aug 31, 2019 8:59 am
Forum: Field of Glory II
Topic: Armored Horse Archers?
Replies: 11
Views: 579

Re: Armored Horse Archers?

they may not turn around as easily as light horse but If their morale is good enough and you keep them out of charge reach, they can withdraw without becoming disrupted If you keep them out of charge range they can't shoot, indeed. Unless you play the angles just right, sure, but good players will ...
by Zardoz02
Wed Aug 21, 2019 1:50 am
Forum: Field of Glory II: Tech Support
Topic: Multiplayer issue - corrupt or invalid response from server
Replies: 21
Views: 623

Re: Multiplayer issue - corrupt or invalid response from server

Another one with the "corrupt or invalid response from server". Happening for a couple of days now. I've checked all the usual suspects eg I can ping your server and do a browser HTTP request to it which returns a reasonable error message in the browser. https://photos.app.goo.gl/APi4JY5Qe5nAb7Lb8 I...
by Zardoz02
Sat Apr 06, 2019 11:40 pm
Forum: Field of Glory II
Topic: I've struggled hard to like this game...
Replies: 67
Views: 4493

Re: I've struggled hard to like this game...

But that personal preference is often derived from a desire to play competitively. I found the same fundamental division in tabletop-land. Possibly, competitive PBEM-focused rulesets (or those rulesets which get used in that way, whether the authors intended that outcome or not) need to just accept ...
by Zardoz02
Sat Mar 23, 2019 6:51 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: The Dustbin
Replies: 9513
Views: 259230

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Division C

Zardoz02 (Lysimachid 320-281 BC) beat SLancaster (Macedonians 320-261 BC) 74-37.

The Lysimachids had a perfect defensive position on a central hill. Thanks to SLancaster for fighting it out; I probably would have tried for a draw in his position.
by Zardoz02
Thu Mar 21, 2019 12:03 am
Forum: Field of Glory II
Topic: Double-Breaks Far too Frequent
Replies: 151
Views: 7800

Re: Double-Breaks Far too Frequent

In Division A where the majority of players have proven records. If games are played where both armies just collide simultaneously on some axis, someone did something very wrong. Grrrrr.... Completely off-topic but I can't resist replying to the person who made such a useful introductory video seri...
by Zardoz02
Mon Mar 11, 2019 5:11 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: The Dustbin
Replies: 9513
Views: 259230

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Div C
Zardoz02 (Lysimachid 320-281 BC) beat Barrold713 (Pontics 110-85 BC) 49-15.
by Zardoz02
Sun Feb 24, 2019 10:50 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: The Dustbin
Replies: 9513
Views: 259230

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Division C The game ran to the full number of turns leaving Zardoz02 (Lysimachid 320-281 BC) ahead of cromlechi (Seleucids 166-125 BC) at 44-50. More-or-less evenly matched pike armies with the Lysimachid pikes gaining terrain advantage on a hill but still facing difficulties countering the Seleucid...
by Zardoz02
Sat Feb 02, 2019 9:07 am
Forum: Field of Glory II
Topic: Autobreak loss levels
Replies: 4
Views: 493

Re: Autobreak loss levels

Ah OK, thanks.
by Zardoz02
Fri Feb 01, 2019 9:23 am
Forum: Field of Glory II
Topic: Autobreak loss levels
Replies: 4
Views: 493

Re: Autobreak loss levels

Can we guestimate the % levels for the basic quality categories elite/superior/average/raw? The manual says "average quality unit will autobreak if it falls below about 50%" so it is different to the tabletop rules. How different, sorta...
by Zardoz02
Fri Feb 01, 2019 9:06 am
Forum: Field of Glory II
Topic: Autobreak loss levels
Replies: 4
Views: 493

Autobreak loss levels

Is there a defined set of percentage losses for the various quality levels in this game or is it more dynamic? In the tabletop rules there is a simple table that tells me e.g. that superior BGs autobreak at > 50% loss. Should I expect to find the same simple table in this game? It doesn't seem to be...
by Zardoz02
Fri Jan 25, 2019 10:02 pm
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: The Dustbin
Replies: 9513
Views: 259230

Re: Army allocations for Classical Antiquity . . .

Hmmm... definitely changing my name to "aardvark".
by Zardoz02
Fri Jan 25, 2019 9:14 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: The Dustbin
Replies: 9513
Views: 259230

Re: Divisions for Classical Antiquity . . .

LOL so the 'Z' thing doesn't matter any more. So much for 'gaming' my selections...
by Zardoz02
Fri Jan 25, 2019 1:09 am
Forum: Field of Glory II
Topic: Shooty scooty Hun cavalry
Replies: 2
Views: 473

Shooty scooty Hun cavalry

Does anybody have a simple tactical doctrine for pinning and destroying Hun bow cavalry? I've just played an interesting Romans vs Huns game where I see that, to win, the Romans not only have to survive the arrow storm, but also knock out a significant number of cav units to get a win. Trouble is wh...
by Zardoz02
Thu Jan 17, 2019 11:08 pm
Forum: Field of Glory II
Topic: Pursuing through a primary ZOC.
Replies: 7
Views: 516

Re: Pursuing through a primary ZOC.

4) Although ignoring primary ZoC sometimes lets pursuers into advantageous positions, their uncontrolled pursuit is more likely to put them in a dangerous position, vulnerable to flank attacks and pinning. The dangerous one is where a cavalry unit pursues an evading light unit through a battle line...
by Zardoz02
Thu Jan 17, 2019 12:10 am
Forum: Field of Glory II
Topic: Pursuing through a primary ZOC.
Replies: 7
Views: 516

Pursuing through a primary ZOC.

Simple question: why is this allowed if the primary ZOC restricts other types of movement? :(
by Zardoz02
Mon Jan 14, 2019 3:44 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: The Dustbin
Replies: 9513
Views: 259230

Re: Late Antiquity recruitment is now open!

1. Scots-Irish 50 BC-476 AD
2. Roman 105-25 BC
3. Palmyran 258-273 AD
4. Sassanid Persian 477-590 AD*
by Zardoz02
Mon Jan 14, 2019 3:41 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: The Dustbin
Replies: 9513
Views: 259230

Re: Classical Antiquity recruitment is now open!

1. Pontic 110-85 BC
2. Roman 105-25 BC
3. Seleucid 166-125 BC
4. Carthaginian 235-146 BC

ta.

Go to advanced search