Division B
kraff (Ghurid 1100-1215 AD with Indian (Hindu North) 1050-1300 AD allies) beat paulmcneil (Armenian (Cilician) 1100-1154 AD with Seljuq Turkish (West) 1037-1154 AD allies): 42-17.
Search found 240 matches
- Tue Dec 07, 2021 11:11 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1734917
- Sun Dec 05, 2021 7:19 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II: Frequently Asked Questions
- Topic: Quick Questions Thread on Rules
- Replies: 244
- Views: 37005
Re: Quick Questions Thread on Rules
Are there any plans of removing double drops of cohesion from the game? No Are there any plans to revise any unit stats? Or maybe de-buff some army lists, like the Muslim from the time of conquest (overpowered, I think)? Or to give extra love to certain army lists? E.g. the Sassanid, which is gross...
- Sun Dec 05, 2021 12:21 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1734917
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division B
batesmotel (Roman 219-200 BC with Greek 227-146 BC allies) beat kraff (Galatian 62-25 BC with Roman 105-25 BC allies): 43-12.
Not sure why he didn't report it, so let me do it for him.
batesmotel (Roman 219-200 BC with Greek 227-146 BC allies) beat kraff (Galatian 62-25 BC with Roman 105-25 BC allies): 43-12.
Not sure why he didn't report it, so let me do it for him.
- Sun Dec 05, 2021 12:16 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1734917
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division B
kraff (Galatian 62-25 BC with Roman 105-25 BC allies) beat IMC (Spartan 221-146 BC with Roman 280-220 BC allies): 56-30.
kraff (Galatian 62-25 BC with Roman 105-25 BC allies) beat IMC (Spartan 221-146 BC with Roman 280-220 BC allies): 56-30.
- Thu Dec 02, 2021 4:28 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1734917
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division B
kraff (Galatian 62-25 BC with Roman 105-25 BC allies) beat carpenkm (Roman 105-25 BC with Armenian 331 BC-252 AD allies): 62-58
(3-1)
kraff (Galatian 62-25 BC with Roman 105-25 BC allies) beat carpenkm (Roman 105-25 BC with Armenian 331 BC-252 AD allies): 62-58
(3-1)
- Thu Dec 02, 2021 11:06 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1734917
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division B
kraff (Arab (Conquest) 638-684 AD) beat lydianed (Rus 960-1053 AD with Bulgar (Danube) 852-1018 AD allies): 61-34.
kraff (Arab (Conquest) 638-684 AD) beat lydianed (Rus 960-1053 AD with Bulgar (Danube) 852-1018 AD allies): 61-34.
- Fri Nov 26, 2021 11:08 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II: Frequently Asked Questions
- Topic: Quick Questions Thread on Rules
- Replies: 244
- Views: 37005
Re: Quick Questions Thread on Rules
Are there any plans of removing double drops of cohesion from the game?
- Wed Nov 24, 2021 8:27 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1734917
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division B
kraff (Arab (Conquest) 638-684 AD) beat IMC (Viking (Ireland) 900-1049 AD with Scots 851-1051 AD allies): 42-16.
kraff (Arab (Conquest) 638-684 AD) beat IMC (Viking (Ireland) 900-1049 AD with Scots 851-1051 AD allies): 42-16.
- Tue Nov 23, 2021 8:44 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1734917
Re: Captainwaltersavage has won High Middle Ages Division B!
Congratulations!
- Fri Nov 19, 2021 9:54 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1734917
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division B kraff (Arab (Conquest) 638-684 AD) beat Nijis (Armenian 885-1045 AD with Byzantine 963-987 AD allies): 51-26. We had 3 or 4 turns left to play, at 51-30, and Nijis decided to secure a draw, which was understandable. He started to pull out his troops, and given the distance it would be imp...
- Fri Nov 19, 2021 6:25 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1734917
Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Division B
kraff (Galatian 62-25 BC with Roman 105-25 BC allies) challenges batesmotel (Roman 219-200 BC with Greek 227-146 BC allies).
Password is "batesmotel".
PM sent.
kraff (Galatian 62-25 BC with Roman 105-25 BC allies) challenges batesmotel (Roman 219-200 BC with Greek 227-146 BC allies).
Password is "batesmotel".
PM sent.
- Fri Nov 19, 2021 6:22 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1734917
Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Division B
kraff (Galatian 62-25 BC with Roman 105-25 BC allies) challenges Challenge1 (Seleucid 166-125 BC with Jewish 163-111 BC allies).
Password is "Challenge1".
PM sent.
kraff (Galatian 62-25 BC with Roman 105-25 BC allies) challenges Challenge1 (Seleucid 166-125 BC with Jewish 163-111 BC allies).
Password is "Challenge1".
PM sent.
- Fri Nov 19, 2021 6:04 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1734917
Re: Early Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Division B
kraff (Arab (Conquest) 638-684 AD) challenges lunecastle (Anglo-Saxon 600-870 AD with Welsh 600-1049 AD allies).
Password is "lunecastle".
PM sent.
kraff (Arab (Conquest) 638-684 AD) challenges lunecastle (Anglo-Saxon 600-870 AD with Welsh 600-1049 AD allies).
Password is "lunecastle".
PM sent.
- Fri Nov 19, 2021 5:54 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1734917
Re: High Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Division B
kraff (Ghurid 1100-1215 AD with Indian (Hindu North) 1050-1300 AD allies) challenges paulmcneil (Armenian (Cilician) 1100-1154 AD with Seljuq Turkish (West) 1037-1154 AD allies).
Password is "paulmcneil".
PM sent.
kraff (Ghurid 1100-1215 AD with Indian (Hindu North) 1050-1300 AD allies) challenges paulmcneil (Armenian (Cilician) 1100-1154 AD with Seljuq Turkish (West) 1037-1154 AD allies).
Password is "paulmcneil".
PM sent.
- Fri Nov 19, 2021 5:35 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1734917
Re: High Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division B
kraff (Ghurid 1100-1215 AD with Indian (Hindu North) 1050-1300 AD allies) drew with TaBai (Mongol (Ilkhanid) 1230-1353 AD with Armenian (Cilicia) 1155-1375 AD allies): 56-36.
(2-2)
kraff (Ghurid 1100-1215 AD with Indian (Hindu North) 1050-1300 AD allies) drew with TaBai (Mongol (Ilkhanid) 1230-1353 AD with Armenian (Cilicia) 1155-1375 AD allies): 56-36.
(2-2)
- Fri Nov 19, 2021 10:31 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II: Tech Support
- Topic: 2 separate questions/bugs
- Replies: 9
- Views: 889
Re: 2 separate questions/bugs
I understand your position, but this rule is working as intended and isn't going to change. I take your point about the manual, but a revision thereof isn't likely to happen any time soon - although hopefully we will be able to do a revised manual at some time in the future. The rules on Charges in...
- Fri Nov 19, 2021 10:25 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1734917
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division C
kraff (Visigoth 419-621 AD) beat ulysisgrunt (Jewish Revolt 66-135 AD): 40-9.
kraff (Visigoth 419-621 AD) beat ulysisgrunt (Jewish Revolt 66-135 AD): 40-9.
- Thu Nov 18, 2021 9:52 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II: Tech Support
- Topic: Unexpected attack path
- Replies: 1
- Views: 353
Unexpected attack path
As shown on attached screenshot, attack path of my cavalry is quite strange - if I clicked the attack button, the unit would have enough APs to make two sharp turns (something that is not normally possible): turn 45 degrees to the right, and then 45 degrees to the left and then charge the irregular ...
- Thu Nov 18, 2021 9:41 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II: Tech Support
- Topic: Heavy infantry unexpectedly not severely disordered when in melee with a unit standing in deep stream
- Replies: 3
- Views: 378
Re: Heavy infantry unexpectedly not severely disordered when in melee with a unit standing in deep stream
It depends upon what exactly happened before the screenshots. I would guess that the Huscarls charged the Light Archers first, thus becoming Severely Disordered as they were attacking an enemy unit in Deep Stream. Then, again I am guessing here, the Dailami charged the Huscarls while they were Seve...
- Thu Nov 18, 2021 8:00 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II: Tech Support
- Topic: Heavy infantry unexpectedly not severely disordered when in melee with a unit standing in deep stream
- Replies: 3
- Views: 378
Heavy infantry unexpectedly not severely disordered when in melee with a unit standing in deep stream
I observed a following situation (attaching screenshots): Two units: foot archers and dailami foot are occupying squares with deep stream and are in melee with huscarl heavy infantry. Dailamis are moderately disrupted, while the huscarls are severely disordered. I resolve melee phase between my foot...