Division B

kraff (Ghurid 1100-1215 AD with Indian (Hindu North) 1050-1300 AD allies) beat paulmcneil (Armenian (Cilician) 1100-1154 AD with Seljuq Turkish (West) 1037-1154 AD allies): 42-17.

Are there any plans of removing double drops of cohesion from the game? No Are there any plans to revise any unit stats? Or maybe de-buff some army lists, like the Muslim from the time of conquest (overpowered, I think)? Or to give extra love to certain army lists? E.g. the Sassanid, which is gross...

Division B

batesmotel (Roman 219-200 BC with Greek 227-146 BC allies) beat kraff (Galatian 62-25 BC with Roman 105-25 BC allies): 43-12.

Not sure why he didn't report it, so let me do it for him.

Division B

kraff (Galatian 62-25 BC with Roman 105-25 BC allies) beat IMC (Spartan 221-146 BC with Roman 280-220 BC allies): 56-30.

Division B

kraff (Galatian 62-25 BC with Roman 105-25 BC allies) beat carpenkm (Roman 105-25 BC with Armenian 331 BC-252 AD allies): 62-58

(3-1)

Division B

kraff (Arab (Conquest) 638-684 AD) beat lydianed (Rus 960-1053 AD with Bulgar (Danube) 852-1018 AD allies): 61-34.

Are there any plans of removing double drops of cohesion from the game?

Division B

kraff (Arab (Conquest) 638-684 AD) beat IMC (Viking (Ireland) 900-1049 AD with Scots 851-1051 AD allies): 42-16.

Congratulations!

Division B kraff (Arab (Conquest) 638-684 AD) beat Nijis (Armenian 885-1045 AD with Byzantine 963-987 AD allies): 51-26. We had 3 or 4 turns left to play, at 51-30, and Nijis decided to secure a draw, which was understandable. He started to pull out his troops, and given the distance it would be imp...

Division B

kraff (Galatian 62-25 BC with Roman 105-25 BC allies) challenges batesmotel (Roman 219-200 BC with Greek 227-146 BC allies).

Password is "batesmotel".

PM sent.

Division B

kraff (Galatian 62-25 BC with Roman 105-25 BC allies) challenges Challenge1 (Seleucid 166-125 BC with Jewish 163-111 BC allies).

Password is "Challenge1".

PM sent.

Division B

kraff (Arab (Conquest) 638-684 AD) challenges lunecastle (Anglo-Saxon 600-870 AD with Welsh 600-1049 AD allies).

Password is "lunecastle".

PM sent.

Division B

kraff (Ghurid 1100-1215 AD with Indian (Hindu North) 1050-1300 AD allies) challenges paulmcneil (Armenian (Cilician) 1100-1154 AD with Seljuq Turkish (West) 1037-1154 AD allies).

Password is "paulmcneil".

PM sent.

Division B

kraff (Ghurid 1100-1215 AD with Indian (Hindu North) 1050-1300 AD allies) drew with TaBai (Mongol (Ilkhanid) 1230-1353 AD with Armenian (Cilicia) 1155-1375 AD allies): 56-36.

(2-2)

I understand your position, but this rule is working as intended and isn't going to change. I take your point about the manual, but a revision thereof isn't likely to happen any time soon - although hopefully we will be able to do a revised manual at some time in the future. The rules on Charges in...

Division C

kraff (Visigoth 419-621 AD) beat ulysisgrunt (Jewish Revolt 66-135 AD): 40-9.

As shown on attached screenshot, attack path of my cavalry is quite strange - if I clicked the attack button, the unit would have enough APs to make two sharp turns (something that is not normally possible): turn 45 degrees to the right, and then 45 degrees to the left and then charge the irregular ...

It depends upon what exactly happened before the screenshots. I would guess that the Huscarls charged the Light Archers first, thus becoming Severely Disordered as they were attacking an enemy unit in Deep Stream. Then, again I am guessing here, the Dailami charged the Huscarls while they were Seve...

I observed a following situation (attaching screenshots): Two units: foot archers and dailami foot are occupying squares with deep stream and are in melee with huscarl heavy infantry. Dailamis are moderately disrupted, while the huscarls are severely disordered. I resolve melee phase between my foot...