I like the idea of 4 turns per year so that different seasons can be represented on the campaign and battle maps but accept 1 TPY may be more practical as mentioned above. Would it be possible for that 1 year to be assigned to a random season and this be represented on campaign and battle maps ?? T...

rbodleyscott wrote: ↑

Sun Jan 20, 2019 8:18 am

I will enquire whether a change could be made to the engine to allow ir.

Thank you!

I think use the top view mode(press M) can easy control units and view the situation of battlefield,and more like the fog1's battle view,but in game I can't rotate the map in this mode,that's really awkward and uncomfortable...

An option would be difficult to set, as changing the pace of the game implies changing a few things, so that everything remains roughly in balance. So indeed, you can edit a single number in a text file and change the turn time to something else (given the game is moddable), but this would have sid...

Two years per a turn is too fast,one season per turn will make the game's playble time longer and more playability than before(players can do more things in one year).I don't wanna see another total war rome2(though that is one year per a turn but it is still fast).

It's better only affect to the multiplayer battles.not singleplayer battles.

You could replace the following sound effect files with quieter or silent samples: \Data\Sounds\FANFARE_BARBARIAN_CARNYX_Av2.wav \Data\Sounds\FANFARE_ROMAN_CORNU_Av2.wav This should not interfere with MP. Nevertheless I would advise backing up the original files in case you need to put them back fo...

It's really,really too loud,even loudly than the voice of combat,nearly to shock me today.Or just cancel it like in the pike&shot and the Sengoku Jidai?I really think the voice of turn start is strident and useless.

Maybe too many bowmen(means massed archer units) shooting at the same time will made that loud,I think..... Because the sound is played for each model that shoots, 480 bowmen (8 models) are twice as loud in the game as 240 bowmen (4 models). This is working as designed. If the larger unit used the ...

Today I'm checking the main game's data,then I found the folder called "sounds",I found the" ATTACK_MASSED_ARCHER" and "ATTACK_SKIRMISH_ARCHER"files,I tried in game then because I've never heard that massed archer's attack sound,then I found the massed archer units'(including the roman auxiliary ar...

Today I'm checking the main game's data,then I found the folder called "sounds",I found the" ATTACK_MASSED_ARCHER" and "ATTACK_SKIRMISH_ARCHER"files in it,I tried in game then because I've never heard that massed archer's attack sound,then I found the massed archer units'(including the roman auxilia...

I have moved the above two posts to this existing thread. In my opinion fatigue is already sufficiently modelled by the decreasing performance resulting from losses (and low ammo) that are unavoidable in extended combat even when unit is winning. As a result, when a unit has done something that cou...

TimDee58 wrote: ↑

Tue Dec 11, 2018 1:49 pm

cohesion surely includes fatigue?

Yes,when your units starts being fatigue,they will not be more cohesive as before.

The fatigue depends on the units' quality,armor protection's degree,terrain,and battle times.Fatigue will recovery by turns,recover speed Is also depends on these.（similar to the morale system what already have）

Do we know what happened to the eastern legions during the rise of Palmyra? I can't see anything in the ancient sources to say they were defeated or redeployed. Most likely, some at least joined Palmyra when central Roman authority collapsed just as they did with the Empire of Gaul. Maybe most of t...

We wanna know more about the game's development details.

Did Palmyran armies really just have archers and cavalry? Seems very unlikely to me. Zenobia's army would be drawing troops from a large area, much of it urbanised. Even in the early days they would have access to mercenaries. Therefore I would have thought they would have troops at least similar t...

Or maybe you should divide the palmyra army list to 258-267ad（Odaenathus）and 268-273ad（Zenobia）? We could do that. We tried to avoid too much division of lists because otherwise people might complain that we were dividing the lists up just to make the number of lists seem larger. I think nobody wil...

When I'm going to make a custom battle today.I found the palmyra army list now have many roman units,and use the archers and massed archers to replace the eastern archers and massed eastern archers...this is not been noted in the patch notes,and I don't remember there're roman units fight for queen ...

@rbodleyscott As the title said,but we can't let them dismount in the custom battle and quick battles(also in the campaign battles),but they're already dismount in the epic battle's battle of Taginae.Make them dismountbale in game will give players more tactical choices. It would, but the history d...