I'm in 1600 pts.

1 Macedonian 328-321 BC
2 Roman 199-106 BC Numidean or Moorish 341 -56 BC
3 Indo-Parthian 60 BC-30 AD Allies Indian 500 BC - 319 AD
4 Seleucid 320-303 BC

(Armies checked 22/9, OK, Season 8: dne - stockwellpete)

I'm in 1600 pts. Armies to follow.

I'm in 1600 pts. Armies to follow.

desertedfox

Cheers.

Hi Pocus,

Can this manual patch be applied in a multiplayer game with disrupting it?

Thx for clarification Pete.

Hi Pete, assuming it all goes well nest season with the trial. Istead of then rolling out all periods deafult 1200 pts (if I am reading it correctly) with player option for 1600, why not split it with 2 periods at 1200 default and 2 periods at 1600? The way you currently have it, and I could be wron...

The thing that surprised us, was when we looked in to banning them, 4 had already been banned, one of which was dkalenda, the other 3 in July. Can one assume that those other three have received a permanent ban? I hope so. Also, I like your new system. It's the player's responsibility to have a rel...

Saves are done server side, so there is no chance of cheating when doing that.

Division A

desertedfox - Achaemenid Persian 545-481 BC defeated nyczar - Assyrian 681-609 BC with Median 836-627 BC allies 60-42 on the last turn.

Division B

desertedfox - German Foot Tribes 260-599 AD with Roman 379-424 allies defeated lydianed - Moorish 350-698 AD with Byzantine 493-550 AD allies 60 - 44.

Thx 4 a tight game right to the end.

This topic has been active for a week now, surely that is enough time for slitherine to establish if anyone else has been cheating.

Division B

desertedfox - German Foot Tribes 260-599 AD with Roman 379-424 allies

challenges

lydianed - Moorish 350-698 AD with Byzantine 493-550 AD allies

PW = 4321

PM sent

I played 36 games this season, and only one was a 0-0 draw - and it was my doing. I felt quite unable to advance with my Vikings in Ireland list in the open against Nosy_Rat's army, and he was unwilling to advance against my strong position. Well Snuggles, according to our resident "Doctor Phil", a...

I doubt anyone is actively tanking but it is clear that just the psychological blow to their ego when losing is enough for them to take up negative gameplay and accept a 0-0 draw when it isn't going to hurt them. This is a ridiculous statement. My decision was not based on my ego but rather why sho...

Seeing as you are attacking "my charatcer" Mike, please tell us all here with your self-proclaimed, profound wisdom what you would have done in my situation?

It sounds to me like you are making choices here, Harvey. Did you not suggest a re-set? Rule 4 states, "Players may agree to re-start a match within the first three turns if they believe the terrain is likely to produce a sterile match or a draw. The maximum number of re-starts permitted for a sing...

I honestly don’t feel that defensive play leading to 0-0 draws is an endemic problem in the DL. From my perspective in three seasons in the lower divisions, I’ve never seen a 0-0 draw in the games I’ve played. I did have two 2-2 draws this season if I remember correctly. Neither was due to defensiv...

Given there are a limited number of army lists to choose from and within them are a limited number of "offensive" armies, someone is going to be stuck with a rather defensive army. Given that is the case they either try and find a good defensive position or they march into the open field to be slaug...