Search found 186 matches

by desertedfox
Fri Feb 21, 2020 7:11 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: Biblical: arrange your matches here . . .
Replies: 44
Views: 1032

Re: Biblical: arrange your matches here . . .

Division A

desertedfox - Egyptian 664-571BC with Assyrian allies 681-609BC challenges

XLegione - Lydian 550-546BC with Greek (Asiatic) allies 550-461BC
youngr - Babylonian 626-539BC with Median allies 626-550BC

PW = 4321

PM sent
by desertedfox
Mon Feb 17, 2020 11:21 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Replies: 68
Views: 1084

Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Division B

desertedfox - Greek 227-146BC with Roman allies 280-220BC challenges

Schweetness101 - Carthaginian 235-146BC with Spanish allies 300-10BC
Trogilus - Pergamene 190-129BC

PW = 4321

PM sent.
by desertedfox
Sun Feb 16, 2020 1:12 pm
Forum: Field of Glory: Empires
Topic: Provincial Units Infographic - Full List
Replies: 11
Views: 910

Re: Provincial Units Infographic - Full List

poesel71 wrote:
Sun Feb 09, 2020 10:34 am
Could you please make this information available as a text file?
Send me a PM with your email, I have an xl file with them all on. Think I found it on steam but can't find it again now to put a link.
by desertedfox
Sun Feb 16, 2020 8:30 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Replies: 60
Views: 1470

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Division B

desertedfox - Roman 24BC–196AD Jewish allies 64 BC-6AD defeated Cunningcairn - Roman 379-424AD with Germanic/Gothic Horse Tribes allies 260-492AD 43- 14

Thx 4 a GG.
by desertedfox
Sun Feb 16, 2020 1:50 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Replies: 87
Views: 2092

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Division B

desertedfox - Greek 227-146BC with Roman allies 280-220BC defeated oscarius - Seleucid 166-125BC Parthian allies 250BC-225AD 40 - 14

Thx 4 a GG.
by desertedfox
Fri Feb 14, 2020 2:03 pm
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Replies: 60
Views: 1470

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Division B

desertedfox - Roman 24BC–196AD Jewish allies 64 BC-6AD defeated IMC - Moorish 350-698AD 58 - 33

Thx 4 a GG.
by desertedfox
Wed Feb 12, 2020 2:48 pm
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Replies: 87
Views: 2092

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Division B

desertedfox - Greek 227-146BC with Roman allies 280-220BC defeated batesmotel - Gallic 300-101BC with Samnite allies 355-272BC 61 - 43

Thx 4 a gg.
by desertedfox
Wed Feb 12, 2020 12:09 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Replies: 72
Views: 1188

Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Division B

desertedfox - Roman 24BC–196AD Jewish allies 64 BC-6AD challenges

Challenge1 - Hunnic (Western) 376-454 AD with Germanic Foot Tribes allies 260-599AD

Karvon - Parthian 250 BC-225AD with Arab allies 312BC-299AD

PW = 4321

PM sent.
by desertedfox
Mon Feb 10, 2020 8:20 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Replies: 68
Views: 1084

Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Div B

desertedfox - Greek 227-146BC with Roman allies 280-220BC challenges

edb1815 - Carthaginian (Hannibal in Africa) 202BC

oscarius - Seleucid 166-125BC Parthian allies 250BC-225AD

PW = 4321

PM sent.
by desertedfox
Sun Feb 09, 2020 11:45 pm
Forum: Field of Glory: Empires
Topic: Attack and Defence Again
Replies: 5
Views: 157

Re: Attack and Defence Again

If the attack and defence values of all units were indentical and not differnt, ie attack 7 defecne 7, then this issue would go away to a large degree. To be handicapped because your pike are defending whilst the enemy were lucky, (yes lucky, becasue that is what is boils down to 90% of the time), t...
by desertedfox
Sat Feb 08, 2020 12:41 am
Forum: Field of Glory: Empires
Topic: On skirmishers
Replies: 20
Views: 541

Re: On skirmishers

Archers and Horse Archers are just OP when compared to skirmishers and light horse.

If you don't have access to archers/horse archers and your opponent does, you will be on the receiving end of a huge flogging unless he rolls 1's for all his rolls and you are rolling 6's.
by desertedfox
Mon Feb 03, 2020 11:05 pm
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Replies: 87
Views: 2092

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Division B

desertedfox - Greek 227-146BC with Roman allies 280-220BC defeated lydianed - Roman 219-200BC with Greek allies 227-146BC 48 - 20

Thx 4 a GG.
by desertedfox
Mon Feb 03, 2020 1:51 pm
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Replies: 68
Views: 1084

Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Division B

desertedfox - Greek 227-146BC with Roman allies 280-220BC challenges

batesmotel - Gallic 300-101BC with Samnite allies 355-272BC

PW 4321

PM sent.
by desertedfox
Mon Feb 03, 2020 1:47 pm
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Replies: 72
Views: 1188

Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Div B

desertedfox - Roman 24BC–196AD Jewish allies 64 BC-6AD challenges

IMC - Moorish 350-698AD

PW 4321

PM sent
by desertedfox
Thu Jan 30, 2020 11:50 pm
Forum: Field of Glory: Empires
Topic: Military Reform
Replies: 2
Views: 135

Re: Military Reform

Cheers Loki.
by desertedfox
Thu Jan 30, 2020 8:16 pm
Forum: Field of Glory: Empires
Topic: Military Reform
Replies: 2
Views: 135

Military Reform

Military Reform-Improve Heavy Units "With this decision, all Heavy infantry types available to your nation, if they have a possible upgrade , will be improved." How do you know if your heavy infantry units have an upgrade? This would be an expensive waste of money to select of your nation does have ...
by desertedfox
Tue Jan 28, 2020 5:55 pm
Forum: Field of Glory: Empires
Topic: Multiplayer blitzkrieging thoughts
Replies: 23
Views: 647

Re: Multiplayer blitzkrieging thoughts

here is actually an effective anti-blitz function in the game already, but it affects only Rome. If *ALL* countries had a similar increase of cost for their Heavy Infantries as Rome has, the blitzing would be much harder to accomplish. Even medium size empires (except Rome) can now put together mas...
by desertedfox
Tue Jan 28, 2020 3:38 am
Forum: Field of Glory: Empires
Topic: Multiplayer blitzkrieging thoughts
Replies: 23
Views: 647

Re: Multiplayer blitzkrieging thoughts

For me what the game urgently needs is an ingame private messaging system, where you are able to send a message to another human player, obvioulsy, so as to facilate a coalition against a nation which is getting too strong. Yes yes yes, I know, you can send people a PM, but trust me on this, 9 out o...
by desertedfox
Sat Jan 25, 2020 7:03 pm
Forum: Field of Glory: Empires
Topic: Apparent Bug
Replies: 4
Views: 175

Re: Apparent Bug

I have had this happen as well.
by desertedfox
Sat Jan 25, 2020 1:26 pm
Forum: Field of Glory: Empires
Topic: Emporiums
Replies: 17
Views: 482

Re: Emporiums

Loki, In the game I recevied my first Emporium, one of my other eligible regions at the time which didn't get one has one now that just popped up in e queue. Oh, and as an aside, In my haste the first time around I had decided to scrap a Slave building then I realised I hadn't selected the option ye...

Go to advanced search