TheGrayMouser wrote: ↑

Sun May 31, 2020 1:33 pm

I’d be more apt to test out the anarchy portion as a stand-alone instead of the smorgasbord of additional changes. It will pretty hard to test balance and list viability with so many changes at once.

I agree, it's changing the whole nature of the game and far too complicated.

These are fantastic, wish I had had them when the game first came out. Really helpful. Well done and thank you.

stockwellpete wrote: ↑

Fri May 22, 2020 9:01 am

cromlechi wrote: ↑

Fri May 22, 2020 8:58 am

Not sure if Batesmotel has signed up yet but I am playing him now so will prompt him

OK thanks. batesmotel usually signs up just before the start of the tournament.

I did ask him but he didn't reply for some reason, that was at least three turns ago

Not sure if Batesmotel has signed up yet but I am playing him now so will prompt him

I mean, that is me, assuming I am important. I do think that the addition of allies makes for too many Swiss army knife type armies that can do anything, and reduces some of the difficulties posed by attempting to use a certain type of army in situations that it may not be optimal for. But I also k...

I'll save everyone some time here and say that I didn't choose the allied army. It was selected for me and I just accepted the game as normal. Ahh, so your opponent bribed the Numidians to fight for YOUR side, clerical error perhaps by his scribe :) Hoisted by his own petard I think they used to sa...

hmmm, I've always wanted to do this, how do you do it? Is there an option to turn off selection of allies when setting up MP games? Frankly when setting up MP games I like to have some kind of general idea what kind of army I'll be facing, rather than finding one transformed by selection of allied ...

One way to counter an army with lots of light horse is to pick as many light and medium units as you can from your list, spread out in a line across the map so they can't get past you and walk forward. Numidians have the following record in the Digital League: Numidian or Moorish (341-56BC) 0-0-0 Nu...

1) Roman 379-424 AD
2) Arab (City) 300-633 AD with Sassanid Persian 591-628 AD ally
3) Frankish 496-599 AD with Breton 411-579 AD Allies
4) German Horse Tribes 260-492 + Dacian (Carpi) 107-380 allies.


Cheers

Adam

1) Ptolemaic 166-56 BC
2) Egyptian 405-343 BC (Rise of Persia DLC)
3) Roman 105-25 BC and Bithynian 297-74 BC allies
4) Pontic 110-85 BC and Armenian 331 BC-252 AD

Extremely sorry to hear this. My condolences to the family.

Adam

I don't like optional rules either because you end up with many different types of game. Remember the fog of war business in FoG 1 and there was an HPS strategy game that you needed a manual just to work out what optional rules to select. I would welcome a poll on anarchy charges. I'd love to see Be...

(off-topic) I would really like to test those Anarchy charges I've never played with ! plus one, This is my biggest frustration that the people who want to make the game like chess and blame the system everytime somethings happens they don't like have forced the removal of this very realistic game ...

Great job again Pete, thank you.

Division B

cromlechi - Cypriot 549-490BC with Greek allies 680-551BC draws with batesmotel - Kyrenean Greek 630-461BC with Libyan allies 549-301BC 47-48

Thanks for the game

(2-2)

My match with Batesmotel is still ongoing I am afraid. Not sure where we stand.

Division B

cromlechi - Cypriot 549-490BC with Greek allies 680-551BC defeats Trogilus - Carthaginian 550-411BC 68 - 55 thanks for the game

(3-1)

cromlechi (Arab North Africa 789-99 AD with Andalusian 756-1049 AD allies) challenges Snugglebunnies (Roman 199-106 BC with Greek 227-146 BC allies) pw = snuggle

good luck

Division C

cromlechi - Welsh 600-1049AD with Viking allies 900-1049AD defeats lunecastle - Anglo-Saxon 600-870AD with Welsh allies 600-1049AD 60-48

good game thank you

Division C

cromlechi - Egyptian 405-343BC (Rise of Persia DLC) defeats Garokan - Indian 500BC-319AD 57-16

Thanks for the game