I found that you get to few requisition points. It's very great that you now can incorporate your war heroes from blitzkrieg but bying back your blitzkrieg core forces is very expensive. You have now also a lot of land & air command points but I simply cannot fill them all in because of constant lac...

Wow, is there a Kursk scenario for OrderOfBattle?
I would love to have that to!
Cheers
Robby

Thx
Robby.

Dear Sir

Today I bought US-marines , the last OrderOfBattle expansion I didn't have.
I can't download it!
When I push the download button all I get is : orderofbattle-pacific-setup release-158.exe
nothing happens!
Please help.
Robby Ivens

You mean the spitfire landing on ostend airfield?
YES.

Cheers
Robby

When the new mission objective popped up : destroy 1 spitfire unit : it simply flew and landed on ostend airfield.
It stayed there for a couple of turns never scrambled again!
All I had to do was to destroy it with a ground unit.
Ha ha , so far for the dreaded spitfire!
Cheers
Robby

Thx

I Got it now.

Cheers
Robby

Hi I have a problem with exporting my core force from morning sun to rising sun when I finished morning sun: In the core force screen you have right an empty screen and to the left a scroll tab with your unit pics in and on the top of that a "exporting force button" How do I drag my forces to the ri...

I played through the blitzkrieg-beta scenarios.
I'm eagerly waiting for the full game to be released.
OoB is very addictive.

cheers
Robby

When does the beta start?
I've enlisted & I'm eager to participate.
Greeting's
Robby

I strongly agree with You.
But do you mean the swastika?
The game developers can't do that.
Althought it's historicaly correct , the games company could be sued for nazi sympathizants.
That's why I think they go for a more symplistic view of vlag.
greeting's
Robby

Beautiful!

OoB with the blitzkrieg;

It's like panzer general but with fewer units and much better graphics & game engine.
I'm looking forward to it!

ok! thanks

The churchill III was a heavy tank.
It had the same thickness of frontal armour as a tiger I.
The Russian ones you could use in the Kursk campaign have only armour value 58 , that's the same as a medium tank.
Please BA 2 team could you correct this?

The Churchill III was a heavy tank with the same frontal armour as a tiger I.
The Russian ones U can use in the kursk campaign have only armour value 58 , that's the same as a medium tank.
Please Ba 2 team correct this.
greeting's
Robby.

Those elephants are really auwesome! Originally the germans used them as line breakers wich was a bad idea because of lack of machine guns and pover mobility.
Put them a bit behind in your force and there long range tank kill power will make the difference.

I am a warhammer 40k table top gamer for more than a decade.
I have a ultramarines army.
I've enlisted for the beta testing game.
I 'm realy looking forward to the game.
Cheers.
Robby.

yes , I agree with Scole.
In reality moving ahead of the main battle group are the scout units.
But drawing OP fire with cheap units is a common tactic used by multi-players.
I also find it not fair and in the spirit of realism.
But I don't see how the game designers can counter that.

The new music by the opening scene is great , but in game I find it annoying after a while just like BA1. The original background fire noise was much better and added greatly to the atmosphere of the game.
A pitty it's gone.

When you pick up guns with a transport it dissapears inside the vehicle. Is'nt it possible to draw it so that the gun is behind the transport? I know it's a little late to change that detail because the game is almost ready to be released, but in the first BA it was the same minor flaw. I just want ...