Yep, each unit definition is counted, so it is rather a user mistake if you define types and classes that can be shared by one unit. I hadn’t really paid attention to that either in the past, as so many other counters has worked fine so far. KM is truly the least played campaign for people to notice...

I can't find an explanation for this misbehavior either without getting smart of the code. It also happens with other AI behaviors like LD0+ and even S&D 20. Very strange is that a coastal gun, also a defensive structure, makes the arty fire though. All the other bunkers and forts won't make this ha...

It looks like a design calculation rule that no transports can have a vehicle-attack value. No idea why, as a simple Willys_M1917 recon vehicle shouldn't have much firepower either, but this one has at least veh-att 1, like many other recon vehicles armed with only light machine guns. It's already s...

Nice finds, conboy! Better post your findings here where the rest of the commanders are: http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=374&t=88312 That Foley dude is indeed a good candidate for having nightmares while playing US. It's in the eyes... :shock: I'm pretty sure there will be more real ...

I say this from the admittedly weak position of not having played these scenarios through but from experience and in view of how large these maps are and how many victory point objectives they contain, it would seem that as few as 18 turns may not be sufficient to fairly allow the player to get the...

Sorry, I don't dare to edit my post above due forum attachment bug.

The problem with these infinite triggers is that they won't be normally unchecked anymore if you once enable them with the "Random Trigger" effect. That's why you have to disable them afterwards each time you let them fire.

Oh wait, there is easily another oversight with the spawn triggers. I tend to use such infinite triggers with my random weather system: You have to include "Set Trigger State" in the effects that unchecks the spawn-trigger again. Otherwise, each activated spawn-trigger will fire on the next turn aga...

The strength-plate bug or update-delay don't seem to happen all the time though. Bombard and firing on radar-blips truely seems to have the same damage and efficiency effect, according to my own tests. Bombarding ships with my modified towed artillery guns with naval attack values also do the same d...

I hadn't checked all these old BK and maybe PK triggers if they were changed over the years in the style of Endsieg that disables whole objectives.

Accomplishing objectives is indeed the fun of each scenario, so at least a handful RPs couldn't hurt as commander-replacement.

"Triggers" checked box on upper-left should rather only read "1" to activate only once for spawn triggers. If you only want to spawn something in a specific turn then most likely only once, right? Otherwise, you better clone these triggers and change the "Check Turn" of each of them. "Trigger Event"...

Yep, I see the heavy weapon/machinegun/mortar company attached to one of the three inf-battalions. This is basically also the leader/HQ unit of the regiment. Three regular inf plus one heavy inf doesn’t fit so well into the three main-units for three battalions per regiment scheme. You can also form...

I'm using 2 regular inf and one heavy inf. My heavy inf and engineer units require a transport, so this additionally pumps up their CP +1. As every infantry regiment comes with a supply train carring all the stuff and ammo, same like with towed guns, and engineers can't carry ponton bridges on their...

Just don't get too distracted by others. I know the stressful urge to fix all mistakes so others won't complain anymore. I still have enough to do with my own modifications either, so hardly any time for playing other's stuff at moment. Another pair of eyes can still help once in a while to realize ...

My oldest backup is from v4.1.1 here where non-structure arty has no naval attack values either (yet). I wrote it didn't surprise me, so I have no clue either how this could actually work with bombard then due lack of proper values. I haven't studied the bombard ability either yet what exactly the d...

Winter War DLC was once released on 7.7.2016. This is unfortunately Sunday this year. Let's see... Slitherine only releases games and expansions at Tuesdays and Thursdays, if the policy hasn't changed yet. Today, 225 days have passed since the release of Endsieg on 13.11.2018. That's clearly a recor...

It’s been a long while that I have suggested such mount-button. I still wouldn’t mind the auto-dismount after reach turn, especially for the AI. Most land units don’t really have that many buttons, escept the engineers if they are sitting on a bridge with mines next to them. However, clicking that s...

Here some notes about your scenario by only looking in the editor, Bru-style: #1: Initial German Defense: Defend Hex 3 without pos. You haven’t even set a defended hex, so this is rather not working correctly. I highly recommend Local Defense 0 as default idle-behavior. #2: German Static Defense: St...

Some more short info about the behaviors: Retreat-Move Only units on Seek & Destroy seem to be capable to do distant, manual retreat maneuvers to safety. Units on Local Defense or Defend Hex rather stick to the current places depending on a defined radius but can still do other maneuvers. Return-Mov...

’Move to Hex’ versus ‘Defend Hex’ Here is a comparison between both behaviors where only the red JP human team gets the map revealed. I had to shrink the gif-animations under 1M to make the forum accept them. Move to Hex The AI won't bother about the flags left and right and goes straight to the de...

Sometimes, it’s desired to move infantry in transports even on short distances for reasons of better protection maybe. Only the AI is capable to do such moves for the better or worse. In the name of equality, I propose such possibility too for us discriminated human players. Ctrl-key move is already...