Division C

MikeMarchant (Roman 24 BC-196 AD with Sarmatian 25-375 AD allies) defeated Challenge1 (Dacian 89-106 AD with Sarmatian 25-375 AD allies): 41/15

Bad luck, Challenge1.


Best Wishes

Mike

Regarding battle-sizes in Digital League. Pete told a moment ago the difference of battle-sizes (Medium in Classic and Later Antique, Large in Biblical and Early Medieval) is for variety reasons. I have to say I personally have this season began to dislike the Medium sized battles, as there the ran...

batesmotel wrote: ↑

Sat Jun 20, 2020 8:54 pm

It's a change in the latest update that troops don't turn to face lights if it's would leave them vulnerable to a flank/rear charge.

Chris

Thanks, Chris; that's why I haven't seen this behaviour before.

Such a pity, because I often use LH for this very purpose.


Best wishes

Mike

Another question, and again I don't know whetehr this is a bug or whether I have misunderstood the rules. An enemy spear unit is charged in the rear by a unit of LH. The light horse does not back off and remains in melee. On my opponent's turn the LH is still in contact and ends up fragemented. Now ...

Division C

MikeMarchant (Ghaznavid 962-1187 AD with Turkish 600-1036 AD allies) Drew with IMC (French 888-1049 AD with Viking 900-1049 AD allies): 44/52

Good game, as always, Ian.


Best Wishes

Mike

(2-2)

If the unit hadn't taken many casualties, multiple rallies wouldn't be out of the question, particularly if a better morale grade or with a general. I don't recall ever reading multiple rallies weren't possible. I'm not describing multipe rallies, but a unti rallying after having been broken twice....

Have the rules changed regarding rallies or have I just misremembered them? I've just had an opposition unit rally for the second time after breaking. He broke initially and then rallied and then broke a second time and has now rallied again. I didn't think this was possible. I haven't bothered cha...

If the unit hadn't taken many casualties, multiple rallies wouldn't be out of the question, particularly if a better morale grade or with a general. I don't recall ever reading multiple rallies weren't possible. I'm not describing multipe rallies, but a unti rallying after having been broken twice....

Have the rules changed regarding rallies or have I just misremembered them? I've just had an opposition unit rally for the second time after breaking. He broke initially and then rallied and then broke a second time and has now rallied again. I didn't think this was possible. I haven't bothered chas...

Div C. Karvon (Thracian, Triballi 350 BC with Geta allies) defeated MikeMarchant (Roman 199 BC with Greek (Western) allies) 41-16 for a 4-0 win. Great report, Karvon, but you missed out the bit where you slaughtered my cavalry with your lights at the beginning of the battle, before I'd even finishe...

Division C MikeMarchant (Greek Asiatic 550-461 BC) defeated gamercb (Thracian (Getae) 680-330 BC): 42/8 Really bad luck, Colin. This was the perfect demonstration of how RNG can ruin a game. A victory almost entirely due to luck on my part. There was nothing Colin could do; he couldn't even change t...

Division C

MikeMarchant (Greek Asiatic 550-461 BC) defeated wmpryor (Lydian 550-546 BC): 63/45

Bad luck, wmpryor.


Best Wishes

Mike

Early Middle Ages - Division C

MikeMarchant (Ghaznavid 962-1187 AD with Turkish 600-1036 AD allies) Challenges sunnyboy (Scots 851-1051 AD with Viking 790-899 AD allies)
Password: SPQR
PM Sent.

Best of luck, sunnyboy.


Best Wishes

Mike

Late Antiquity - Division C

MikeMarchant (Roman 24 BC-196 AD with Sarmatian 25-375 AD allies) Challenges Swuul (Germanic/Gothic Horse Tribes 260-492 AD with Dacian, Carpi 107-380 AD allies)
Password: SPQR
PM Sent.

Best of luck, Swuul.


Best Wishes

Mike

Classical Antiquity - Division C

MikeMarchant (Roman 199-106 BC with Greek (Western) 280-49 BC allies) Challenges phoyle3290 (Carthaginian, Hannibal in Italy, 216-203 BC with Bruttian or Lucanian allies)
Password: SPQR
PM Sent.

Best of luck, phoyle3290.


Best Wishes

Mike

Biblical - Division C

MikeMarchant (Greek Asiatic 550-461 BC) Challenges SpeedyCM (Median 626-550 BC)
Password: SPQR
PM Sent.

Best of luck, SpeedyCM.


Best Wishes

Mike

Division C

MikeMarchant (Ghaznavid 962-1187 AD with Turkish 600-1036 AD allies) Defeated Questar17 (Norman 923-1040 AD): 61/50

Bad luck, Questar17.


Best Wishes

Mike

(3-1)

Having thought on the issue of Poisson distribution, which I can't enageg with from a mathematical point of view but can from a philosiphical viewpoint, I ask the following: Statistical clumping is a phenomenon which can and does occur naturally. Statistical clumping is also a phenomenon which can ...

Supporting universal sufferage is certainly not unusual. Supporting it and then wanting to subvert the result shouldn't be unusual either but your views on this matter are increasingly common too sadly......... Still we shall agree to differ on this point and at least agree that FoG2 is a fine game...

Fair enough. So we are left with the position of the status quo without any evidence that beyond such a minority there is any demand to change that status quo. After all, as someone who sets such store by "winning the vote for the common man and women" I am sure you would never want to ignore the m...