Search found 108 matches

by oscarius
Mon Feb 17, 2020 5:51 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Replies: 77
Views: 1305

Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Rob123 you have taken the game I set up (and explicitly labelled) for IMC..
by oscarius
Sun Feb 16, 2020 4:28 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Replies: 77
Views: 1305

Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Div B

oscarius (Seleucid 166-125BC Parthian allies 250BC-225AD) challenges

IMC - Samnite 355-272BC with Gallic allies 300-101BC
lydianed - Roman 219-200BC with Greek allies 227-146BC
edb1815 - Carthaginian (Hannibal in Africa) 202BC

pw oscarius
pm sent
by oscarius
Wed Feb 12, 2020 6:13 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Replies: 114
Views: 2709

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Division B

oscarius (Seleucid w. Parthian allies) beats Trogilus (Pergamene) 66 - 38

A good game
by oscarius
Tue Feb 11, 2020 2:04 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Replies: 94
Views: 2294

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Division B oscarius (German w. Gallic allies) beats cromleichi (Scots-Irish) 44 - 7 With insufficient forest or rough terrain to sufficiently cover his forces the heavy foot fairly naturally prevailed over the medium foot army. A good game where my opponent did the best he could with an army ill-sui...
by oscarius
Sun Feb 09, 2020 9:04 pm
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Replies: 114
Views: 2709

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Division B oscarius (Seleucid w. Parthian allies) beat lydianed (Roman w. Greek allies) 42 - 4 On a nice flat open battleground the stage was set for an interesting clashes of forces. Both sides utilised a mixture of pike and Roman-style infantry (the Romans having the latter from their Greek subord...
by oscarius
Sun Feb 09, 2020 1:28 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Replies: 77
Views: 1305

Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Div B

challenges for

paulmcneil - Galatian 63-25BC with Roman allies 105-25BC
phoyle3290 - Macedonian 320-261BC

pw oscar
pm sent
by oscarius
Sat Feb 01, 2020 10:15 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Replies: 77
Views: 1305

Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Div B

oscarius - Seleucid 166-125BC Parthian allies 250BC-225AD challenges

Trogilus - Pergamene 190-129BC
Schweetness101 - Carthaginian 235-146BC with Spanish allies 300-10BC

pw oscarius
pm sent
by oscarius
Sat Feb 01, 2020 8:54 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Replies: 83
Views: 1407

Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Div B

oscarius challenges

Challenge1 - Hunnic (Western) 376-454 AD with Germanic Foot Tribes allies 260-599AD
cromlechi - Scots-Irish 50-476AD
Cunningcairn - Roman 379-424AD with Germanic/Gothic Horse Tribes allies 260-492AD

pw oscarius
pm sent
by oscarius
Sat Feb 01, 2020 8:41 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: Themed Event: arrange your matches here . . .
Replies: 11
Views: 288

Re: Themed Event: arrange your matches here . . .

Group 2

Challenges posted for Schweetness101

oscarius (Viking 780-899AD) v Schweetness101 (Frankish 751-887AD)
Schweetness101 (Viking 780-899AD) v oscarius (Frankish 751-887AD)

pw oscarius
pm sent
by oscarius
Mon Jan 20, 2020 9:27 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: The Dustbin
Replies: 11183
Views: 328984

Re: Themed Event recruitment is now open . . .

Count me in!
by oscarius
Mon Jan 20, 2020 9:27 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: The Dustbin
Replies: 11183
Views: 328984

Re: Late Antiquity recruitment is now open . . .

Have edited lists in..

1. Germanic Foot Tribes 105 BC-259 AD w. Gallic allies
2. Byzantine 579-599 AD
3. Arab (City) 300-633 AD w. Sassanid (477-590 AD) allies
3. Scots-Irish 50 BC-476 AD


(30)
by oscarius
Mon Jan 20, 2020 9:26 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: The Dustbin
Replies: 11183
Views: 328984

Re: Classical Antiquity recruitment is now open . . .

Looking forwards.

1. Seleucid 166-125 BC w. Parthian allies
2. Pyrrhic 280-272 BC w. Samnite allies
3. Samnite 355-272 BC w. Gallic allies
4. Galatian 62-25 BC w. Roman allies
by oscarius
Wed Jan 01, 2020 10:34 am
Forum: Field of Glory II
Topic: Which Armies/Units would you like to see
Replies: 30
Views: 2407

Re: Which Armies/Units would you like to see

These guys would be great fun too for the Arab Conquest/Rashidun list

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mubarizun

Though what to classify them as? Elite, light cavalry, armoured sword/bowmen?
by oscarius
Thu Dec 05, 2019 5:13 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: The Dustbin
Replies: 11183
Views: 328984

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Division B oscarius (Thracian) beat lydianed (Samnite) 60 - 49 With the evening dark beginning to set in (three turns left!) the victorious Thracians reflected upon the day's fighting. Their foe had been cautious, not budging from his ground even as our superiority in skirmishers saw his cavalry get...
by oscarius
Fri Nov 22, 2019 1:07 pm
Forum: Field of Glory II
Topic: Which Armies/Units would you like to see
Replies: 30
Views: 2407

Re: Which Armies/Units would you like to see

Seconding an alternate graphic for Roman cataphracts. Also a re-vamp of Irregular Foot would be great. Even just broadly into North European, Mediterranean and Near Eastern/Indian branches would be plenty. As it stands they only really blend in well with early Greco-Roman armies and the men in white...
by oscarius
Tue Nov 19, 2019 4:16 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: The Dustbin
Replies: 11183
Views: 328984

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Division B oscarius (Thracians) defeated Ulysisgrunt (Jewish) 65 - 39 Despite both sides possessing strong skirmishing assets we were both eager to initiate the melee and both armies raced to meet. The zealots made no headway against my central pikes while lancers helped prop up my crummy Thracian i...
by oscarius
Fri Nov 15, 2019 9:13 pm
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: The Dustbin
Replies: 11183
Views: 328984

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Division B

oscarius (Thracian) beats IMC (Macedonian) 77 - 52

Successful positioning of elephants proved highly advantageous to my cavalry over his, they then returned to the fray quick enough to allow me to envelop the foe. A good tough game

(3-1)
by oscarius
Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:57 am
Forum: Field of Glory II
Topic: Heavy Weapon anti-armour effect revamp
Replies: 104
Views: 4454

Re: Heavy Weapon anti-armour effect revamp

They will definitely still lose to even mediocre legionaries or Republican hastati on open terrain. I think you're confusing the -Dacian- Falxmen, who can fight toe-to-toe with legionaries quite well and are a useful unit in a lot of circumstances, with the -Thracian- Rhomphaia who will get chewed a...
by oscarius
Fri Nov 08, 2019 4:29 am
Forum: Field of Glory II
Topic: Heavy Weapon anti-armour effect revamp
Replies: 104
Views: 4454

Re: Heavy Weapon anti-armour effect revamp

Anything to make Rhomphaia less garbage. Worse unit for cost in the game hands down. Loses to significantly cheaper medium foot and still too poor quality/armour to take on any sort of cavalry unless defending on rough terrain or flanking (but again this is just as true of medium foot that cost 10 p...
by oscarius
Mon Nov 04, 2019 6:10 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: The Dustbin
Replies: 11183
Views: 328984

Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .

Div C oscarius (Rus) beat Ulysisgrunt (Byzantne) 62 - 46 A large swamp in the centre of the map neatly saw both sides, lacking medium infantry, divided in two with the Byzantine general sending a whole cavalry force on one side while I supported my cavalry with axemen one flank and my regular infant...

Go to advanced search