Search found 14 matches

by LaurenceP
Sat Mar 10, 2018 1:13 pm
Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
Topic: Version 3 Errata
Replies: 67
Views: 11449

Re: Version 3 Errata

Hello I have rulebooks 1 and 2 but was not convinced. Very interested in starting with FoG, I was prepared to order now the v3 rulebook and checked the forum before...my impression: 3rd rule edition out not a long time ago and already a lot of errata???...Even the errata with errors!!!!!!! Why shoul...
by LaurenceP
Fri Jul 04, 2014 11:33 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Version 2.0 Errata
Replies: 57
Views: 18931

Re: Version 2.0 Errata

[quote="grahambriggs.I do not think there is a need for a version 2 errata. Yes there are parts that could be clarified but they are very minor. Maybe 2 times in 100 games would a clarification be useful. And for these 2 times we were able to work something out. The people doing all the discussing a...
by LaurenceP
Mon Mar 24, 2014 10:02 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Version 2.0 Errata
Replies: 57
Views: 18931

Re: Version 2.0 Errata

See my post a few days ago - So once more, WHEN will you publish the obviously necessary errata v2 for print out ? Or all those mistakes and unclear wording in the rule book v2, identified in various topics of this Forum, are not worth to be summarized and clarified? Really necessary to have gamers ...
by LaurenceP
Tue Mar 18, 2014 8:33 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Version 2.0 Errata
Replies: 57
Views: 18931

Re: Version 2.0 Errata

...maybe to summarize mistakes and to clarify unclear wordings/diagrams that are in the rulebook, otherwise we would not have this load of RULE questions with different answers of experts, resulting in topics remaining unclear or inofficial?
Why this topic is called "Version 2.0 Errata"...? :wink:
by LaurenceP
Mon Mar 17, 2014 11:47 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Version 2.0 Errata
Replies: 57
Views: 18931

Re: Version 2.0 Errata

People here still eager in never ending rule arguing in this Forum? For me as a beginner, I am disappointed that the rule team/Slitherine does not feel the need in publishing the official errata v2 for print out, including some obviously necessary clarifications. Once you decided to distribute the r...
by LaurenceP
Sat Jan 11, 2014 5:13 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: BG of battle wagons in column
Replies: 13
Views: 627

Re: BG of battle wagons in column

......moving as a column through terrain. Since this is no longer applicable, it no longer matters. Thanks for reply. So a BG of 2 BWg must be long side by long side, each BWg having 1 long base side that cannot shot. Only one deep base is a poor flank protection :( No - you can still be in any for...
by LaurenceP
Sat Jan 11, 2014 4:58 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: BG of battle wagons in column
Replies: 13
Views: 627

Re: BG of battle wagons in column

dave_r wrote:......moving as a column through terrain. Since this is no longer applicable, it no longer matters.
Thanks for reply. So a BG of 2 BWg must be long side by long side, each BWg having 1 long base side that cannot shot.
Only one deep base is a poor flank protection :(
by LaurenceP
Sat Jan 11, 2014 3:47 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: BG of battle wagons in column
Replies: 13
Views: 627

BG of battle wagons in column

Re page 23 Battle group Formation Exception: a battle group of battle wagons never counts as column except when moving along a road. What is the exception referring to? 1) You can never form a column of BG of battle wagons OFF-road? So flank protection is limited to one long base side only. 2) Or it...
by LaurenceP
Fri Jan 10, 2014 7:48 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Clear clarifications please
Replies: 55
Views: 3902

Re: Clear clarifications please

On the Rules book v2 back cover it says "the complete rules with clear explanations of how to play". Looking at the many topics in Rules Forum, it does not seem clear, even not to English speaking players, for various reasons as explained above. My understanding of a Rules Forum is that you post a q...
by LaurenceP
Tue Jan 07, 2014 12:46 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Clear clarifications please
Replies: 55
Views: 3902

Re: Clear clarifications please

I think the binding rule answers can only be found in the English Forum. I guess those rule answers in other Forum sections/other languages cannot be considered as official clarifications, they are likely "nice to discuss", correct?
by LaurenceP
Tue Jan 07, 2014 12:17 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Clear clarifications please
Replies: 55
Views: 3902

Clear clarifications please

I decided to try FoG AM, so I read with interest some rules questions in the Forum as well. I noticed that if somebody posts a rule question, it is more often followed by opposite replies of, I guess, experienced players or rule team members, see recent example: "Battle wagons CMT for simple move". ...
by LaurenceP
Mon Dec 30, 2013 2:28 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Battle wagons CMT for simple move
Replies: 17
Views: 1132

Re: Battle wagons CMT for simple move

..BUT on Page 43 POINTS TO NOTE ON THE CMT, the definition is: "If a battle Group or battle line Fails its CMT it can make a simple move." There is not an exception like: except artillery and battle wagons. That's why I was asking about this inconsistency and most probably an issue for an errata. So...
by LaurenceP
Sun Dec 29, 2013 11:02 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Version 2.0 Errata
Replies: 57
Views: 18931

Re: Version 2.0 Errata

When will you create and actualize the v2 errata online, as you did for v1?
by LaurenceP
Sun Dec 29, 2013 10:58 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Battle wagons CMT for simple move
Replies: 17
Views: 1132

Battle wagons CMT for simple move

p41 says: battle wagons...must pass CMT, whether simple (or complex) move.

It can do anyway a simple move, p43 says: if fails (the CMT), can make a simple move.

So why "whether simple" on p41 ?

Go to advanced search