Thank you RBS!

Edit, I actually managed to find the spreadsheet and it is easier than I thought to model this. Just 7 "Unit Size" types.

I would have reservations about the strategy. Points spent on units that are useless in a fight means points not spent on units contributing to the fight. Maybe each unit lost results in a lower rout percentage but you will probably lose your frontline troops faster vs an opponent with all his poin...

Something I have "kind of" thought would be interesting to try, I have now seen as an embraced strategy by an opponent in league play: adding mobs to one's force selection to reduce the rout% value of your fighting units. Of course the mobs start hidden in a forest or immediately scamper to safety w...

Division A

nyczar - Spartan 221-146 BC with Roman 280-220 BC allies defeats lunecastle - Seleucid 166-125 BC with Parthian 250 BC-225 AD allies 56-31

Division A

nyczar (Spartan 221-146 BC with Roman 280-220 BC allies) defeats Morbio (Carthaginian 235-146 BC with Spanish (Iberian) 300-10 BC allies) 53%-22%

Pool A Group 3

nyczar (Pergamene 262-191BC) defeats kraff (Seleucid 300-206BC) 59%-28%


Latest standings
1. nyczar 3-12
2. kraff 3-4
3. Captainwaltersavage 4-4

nyczar has qualified for the semi-finals.

Pool A Group 3

nyczar (Seleucid 320-303BC) defeats Captainwaltersavage (Indian 500BC-319AD) 64%-41%

Latest standings
1. nyczar 2-8
2. kraff 2-4
3. Captainwaltersavage 4-4

Pool A Group 3

nyczar Indian 500BC-319AD defeats Captainwaltersavage Seleucid 320-303BC 60%-41%

Division A

nyczar - Roman 285-312 AD with Frankish 260-495 allies defeats GDod - Byzantine 551 AD-578 AD 40%-5%

This is the tournament for the ages. I will happily spectate as I don't think I could survive the stress of playing in either of the divisions I would be placed in. Any medal at any age in any division is a feat. The skill and experience of the "A" division is the best I have seen in a long time...m...

Pool A

Group 3

kraff v nyczar
Seleucid 300-206BC v Pergamene 262-191BC (Seleucid-Pergamene war 238BC)

Game up

PW is rubicon

pm sent

Interesting....despite a vote some month ago that was barely in favor of larger armies (1,600 points) across the digital league, upon review of the two divisions I am playing this season, the preference for 1,600 point battles is overwhelmingly (my guess more than 90%) in favor of 1,600 point contes...

I’ve played FOG II now 3,648 hours which is the equivalent of two years of work and I still love this game. I can’t say that about any other game and I have played my fair share. I have always struggled to put words to why I find the game so compelling, but it wasn’t until I saw a Netflix series cal...

My picks:

1600 Point Preference

1. Byzantine 551-578 AD
2. Roman 285-312 AD with Frankish 260-495 allies
3. Bosporan 11 BC-375 AD with Roman 24BC - 196 AD allies
​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​4. Parthian 250 BC - 225 AD with Seleucid 166- 125BC

Count me in here

1600 point preference

Lists:

1. Spartan 221-146 BC with Roman 280-220 BC Allies
2. Carthaginian (Hannibal in Africa) 202 BC
3. Ptolemaic 55-30 BC with Roman 105-25 BC Allies
4. Pergamene 190-129 BC with Greek 227-146 BC Allies

Armies checked, OK 28/1

Thanks RBS. All good now.

Hi, Got a new general use 4k monitor for my birthday. After setting it up, time to check out FOGII in 4K to see what the new resolution reveals in the the TT mod. I must have done a bad click on a lower resolution, maybe one of the lowest. Now when I start the game, it is too big for any of my scree...

Thanks for the clarification.

I recall reading some time ago that pursuing units will break off their pursuit if "targets of opportunity" appear. My words but the idea was clear ….the pursuing unit will adjust its movement to make a new attack...at an exposed flank for instance. However, my results this past DL season suggest th...