Search found 944 matches

by SnuggleBunnies
Thu Apr 02, 2020 8:00 pm
Forum: Sengoku Jidai: Tournaments & Leagues
Topic: 2020 team event Round One
Replies: 29
Views: 1126

Re: 2020 team event Round One

SnuggleBunnies (Tokugawa) defeats LFDLM (Ikko-Ikki) 55-26 The Tokugawa right flank was largely set to flight in a disastrous chain rout set off by Ikko-Ikki archers Disrupting and then sending fleeing a unit of cavalry. Luckily, a few units of Raw Sohei held out in woods and marshes, while Samurai c...
by SnuggleBunnies
Tue Mar 31, 2020 6:22 am
Forum: Sengoku Jidai: Tournaments & Leagues
Topic: 2020 team event Round One
Replies: 29
Views: 1126

Re: 2020 team event Round One

SnuggleBunnies (Tokugawa) defeats GentlemanRanker (Uesugi) 51-23

The Tokugawa right wing came close to total envelopment and destruction, but reinforcements from the center arrived just in time to avert disaster.

GG
by SnuggleBunnies
Mon Mar 30, 2020 12:51 pm
Forum: Sengoku Jidai: Tournaments & Leagues
Topic: 2020 team event Round One
Replies: 29
Views: 1126

Re: 2020 team event Round One

SnuggleBunnies (Tokugawa) defeats baldrick52 (Uesugi) 54-20

The battle was quite close until a massive chain rout shattered the Uesugi center. GG.
by SnuggleBunnies
Mon Mar 30, 2020 2:41 am
Forum: Knock-out Tournament
Topic: KO Tournament: arrange your matches here . . .
Replies: 69
Views: 1708

Re: KO Tournament: arrange your matches here . . .

SnuggleBunnies (Roman 199-106 w Greek allies) challenges cromlechi (Arab North Africa 789-99 w Andalusian 756-1049 allies)

pw snuggles. PM sent.
by SnuggleBunnies
Sat Mar 28, 2020 10:28 pm
Forum: After Action Reports
Topic: [custom scenario] Rise of the Elephant Kings
Replies: 5
Views: 262

Re: [custom scenario] Rise of the Elephant Kings

Interesting. Though, if there are no firearm troops involved, why not just load up some Indian armies in FoGII?
by SnuggleBunnies
Sat Mar 28, 2020 10:27 pm
Forum: Pike & Shot
Topic: Warriors/Medium Foot
Replies: 9
Views: 300

Re: Warriors/Medium Foot

Hmm, not really. It's mentioned in two spots in the Sengoku Jidai manual, but not at all in the Pike and Shot manual. I do believe it is the same in both games, but I suppose I can't be 100% sure. Honestly these troops rarely appear, so it's not much of a factor. Are there any warrior types in the b...
by SnuggleBunnies
Sat Mar 28, 2020 2:28 pm
Forum: Pike & Shot
Topic: Warriors/Medium Foot
Replies: 9
Views: 300

Re: Warriors/Medium Foot

Warriors get more movement, but are also more likely to uncontrollably pursue defeated foes.
by SnuggleBunnies
Thu Mar 26, 2020 7:19 pm
Forum: Field of Glory II
Topic: Light Chariots
Replies: 11
Views: 478

Re: Light Chariots

But also very cheap. They're useful harassment troops, though they can't fight an enemy cavalry wing unsupported.
by SnuggleBunnies
Thu Mar 26, 2020 3:29 am
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: The Dustbin
Replies: 12744
Views: 407048

Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .

Division A

SnuggleBunnies (Khorasanian) defeats Triarii (Spanish) 47-21

GG
by SnuggleBunnies
Wed Mar 25, 2020 1:15 pm
Forum: Knock-out Tournament
Topic: The Dustbin . . .
Replies: 588
Views: 22530

Re: Sign up for the KO Tournament here . . .

Roman 199-106BC with Greek 227-146BC allies
by SnuggleBunnies
Mon Mar 23, 2020 5:56 pm
Forum: Field of Glory II
Topic: Cavalry breaking off . . .
Replies: 63
Views: 2066

Re: Cavalry breaking off . . .

Can't you just have infantry have their AP reduced by 4 the turn after they've been charged by nonlight cavalry? That would give the cav space, at least against one infantry unit, without giving them 75% backward movement. Of course, they'd have to charge to get the breathing space, so it would be h...
by SnuggleBunnies
Sun Mar 22, 2020 9:02 pm
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: The Dustbin
Replies: 12744
Views: 407048

Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .

Division A

SnuggleBunnies (Khorasanian) defeats NikiforosFokas (Abbasid) 51-24

GG
by SnuggleBunnies
Sun Mar 22, 2020 8:57 pm
Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
Topic: The Dustbin
Replies: 12744
Views: 407048

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Division A

SnuggleBunnies (Byzantine) defeats NikiforosFokas (Palmyrene) 60-41

GG
by SnuggleBunnies
Sun Mar 22, 2020 2:49 pm
Forum: Field of Glory II
Topic: Cavalry breaking off . . .
Replies: 63
Views: 2066

Re: Cavalry breaking off . . .

You can't about face if you're in the infantrys primary zoc
by SnuggleBunnies
Sat Mar 21, 2020 3:26 am
Forum: Sengoku Jidai: Tournaments & Leagues
Topic: 2020 team event Round One
Replies: 29
Views: 1126

Re: 2020 team event Round One

SnuggleBunnies (Tokugawa) defeats GDod (Uesugi) 54-26 GDod slowly overran my left flank riff raff in the forests, but I won the main infantry clash in the center due to the presence of a reserve line of about 2500 spearmen ready to plug any gaps and exploit flanks opened by GDod's elite troops pushi...
by SnuggleBunnies
Sat Mar 21, 2020 3:24 am
Forum: After Action Reports
Topic: Battle of Wimpfen, 1622
Replies: 9
Views: 401

Re: Battle of Wimpfen, 1622

It's enough to cause some disruptions. If you can subsequently break one with your reinforcements you can cause a chain reaction. In addition, the enemy Kurassiers are really quite useless against Steady infantry, so they're just fluff if you can keep them off your own cavalry or disrupted units.
by SnuggleBunnies
Fri Mar 20, 2020 4:30 am
Forum: After Action Reports
Topic: Battle of Wimpfen, 1622
Replies: 9
Views: 401

Re: Battle of Wimpfen, 1622

In another thread I posted: Your Detached Musketeers are the key to the battle. Note that if you move them off the fortifications, they lose the Light Gun attribute, which greatly boosts their firepower. Purchasing the extra artillery is also useful. Keep in mind that artillery lowers the cohesion r...
by SnuggleBunnies
Fri Mar 20, 2020 4:25 am
Forum: After Action Reports
Topic: Battle of the White Mountain, 1620
Replies: 4
Views: 293

Re: Battle of the White Mountain, 1620

Yes, well done indeed, it is a very tough scenario.
by SnuggleBunnies
Fri Mar 20, 2020 4:22 am
Forum: After Action Reports
Topic: Pilgram-Lomnitz, 1618
Replies: 8
Views: 373

Re: Pilgram-Lomnitz, 1618

Yes, I held my cavalry back until my infantry could arrive, and then used musketry combined with artillery fire to force cohesion tests before charging with my foot. In your screenshots above your cavalry appears to have engaged the enemy well ahead of your infantry's advance.

Go to advanced search