Search found 131 matches

by spedders
Fri Aug 04, 2017 12:19 pm
Forum: FOGR Update
Topic: Points costs, revised proposals
Replies: 9
Views: 4581

Re: Points costs, revised proposals

Thanks Kevin. I agree that DH should be more expensive as they have advantages but I think 3pts a base is too much. It is margins but I think 18pts a base is about right.
by spedders
Fri Aug 04, 2017 6:34 am
Forum: FOGR Update
Topic: Points costs, revised proposals
Replies: 9
Views: 4581

Re: Points costs, revised proposals

I am inclined to agree on the points for 2 dice cavalry. 19pts for an armoured sup pi/pi det horse v 16pts for a heavily armoured sup cuirassier still I think favours the cuirassier too much. Evens at impact and in melee but the det horse losing its reroll. I think 18pts would be about right. Others...
by spedders
Wed Aug 02, 2017 7:25 am
Forum: Tournaments
Topic: Britcon 2017 - 11-13 August
Replies: 63
Views: 19909

Re: Britcon 2017 - 11-13 August

Kevin, can you confirm you now have mine. It was re sent yesterday as I realised I had made an error on the email address.

Keith
by spedders
Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:11 pm
Forum: FOGR Update
Topic: Updates - where we are at
Replies: 69
Views: 20963

Re: Updates - where we are at

I agree! Essentially reverting to the old points means we have done nothing to deal with the weakness of det horse, so we will go back to no one using them unless they have too!
by spedders
Sun Jul 23, 2017 9:06 am
Forum: FOGR Update
Topic: Updates - where we are at
Replies: 69
Views: 20963

Re: Updates - where we are at

To be fair Lynette I have found them easier each time I play with them
by spedders
Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:12 pm
Forum: FOGR Update
Topic: Updates - where we are at
Replies: 69
Views: 20963

Re: Updates - where we are at

We do need this sorted and finalised as soon as possible. I am happy with everything save the points cost. I would keep the reduction in costs for det horse, cavaliers and gendarmes. I would keep the changes in mtd weapon costs. I would not adjust any other mtd points cost save for a surcharge for c...
by spedders
Sun Jul 09, 2017 7:09 am
Forum: Tournaments
Topic: Britcon 2017 - 11-13 August
Replies: 63
Views: 19909

Re: Britcon 2017 - 11-13 August

Don't need amendments for that! I think the ones giving a built in penalty to Aussies are the best...

Although with Simon's submarining it would improve his chances!
by spedders
Fri Jul 07, 2017 2:06 pm
Forum: Tournaments
Topic: Britcon 2017 - 11-13 August
Replies: 63
Views: 19909

Re: Britcon 2017 - 11-13 August

I am happy to go with the amendments
by spedders
Wed Jun 14, 2017 8:23 pm
Forum: FOGR Update
Topic: Bows
Replies: 109
Views: 30943

Re: Bows

Not sure what the answer is here as we have a split camp on the short range for bow.
by spedders
Sun Jun 11, 2017 7:50 pm
Forum: FOGR Update
Topic: Proposals summary for playtesting
Replies: 50
Views: 16355

Re: Proposals summary for playtesting

Overall from way of the warrior:

Really didn't find the warrior v reduction of bow short range caused any issues.

Really liked the armour interaction, gives a better balance and the more I play with it the less fiddly it becomes.

Finally really need to reduce naval unit points cost!
by spedders
Sun Jun 11, 2017 7:47 pm
Forum: FOGR Update
Topic: Naval
Replies: 4
Views: 3121

Re: Naval

Again agreed. Might actually make people use them!
by spedders
Sun Jun 11, 2017 7:46 pm
Forum: FOGR Update
Topic: Bows
Replies: 109
Views: 30943

Re: Bows

I agree with Ben on this, in period I have not found issues with the bow range being reduced.
by spedders
Sat May 13, 2017 12:56 pm
Forum: FOGR Update
Topic: Proposals summary for playtesting
Replies: 50
Views: 16355

Re: Proposals summary for playtesting

Personally I would not drop the base cost of cavalry, horse, light horse, I think the weapon cost reductions work on their own.
by spedders
Tue May 09, 2017 5:20 pm
Forum: FOGR Update
Topic: Proposals summary for playtesting
Replies: 50
Views: 16355

Re: Proposals summary for playtesting

I don't have a problem with that. It would also get rid of the query on warrior v bow.
by spedders
Mon May 08, 2017 9:34 am
Forum: FOGR Update
Topic: Proposals summary for playtesting
Replies: 50
Views: 16355

Re: Proposals summary for playtesting

Sorry I didn't make clear that it was only if unsteady they need a CMT to charge. However I think this is unduly penal to troop types, for example tibetan cavalry who are bow* but light lance, they need a 9 to charge if unsteady. The issue is that unless you go through all the lists on a case by cas...
by spedders
Sun May 07, 2017 7:45 pm
Forum: FOGR Update
Topic: Proposals summary for playtesting
Replies: 50
Views: 16355

Re: Proposals summary for playtesting

I have now played two tournaments with the new amendments, 3 games of ecw and 5 of Indian. My thoughts are: 1. I don't agree with the previous comments about dragoons. I think the new rules work and think dragoons are now used more carefully either to fight other dragoons or as supporting troops. 2....
by spedders
Thu Apr 27, 2017 4:25 pm
Forum: Tournaments
Topic: Oxford Round of the Southern League 2017
Replies: 91
Views: 28139

Re: Oxford Round of the Southern League 2017

Yes he is.
by spedders
Wed Apr 26, 2017 10:06 am
Forum: Tournaments
Topic: Oxford Round of the Southern League 2017
Replies: 91
Views: 28139

Re: Oxford Round of the Southern League 2017

Any sign of an R & R for Sunday?
by spedders
Sat Apr 22, 2017 3:41 pm
Forum: Tournaments
Topic: Britcon 2017 - 11-13 August
Replies: 63
Views: 19909

Re: Britcon 2017 - 11-13 August

I am

Keith

Go to advanced search