The Dustbin

Moderator: Field of Glory 2 Tournaments Managers

lunecastle
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Posts: 49
Joined: Sat Mar 23, 2019 9:47 am

Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .

Post by lunecastle » Sat Feb 29, 2020 10:56 am

Division C

Lunecastle Babylonian 626-539BC with Median allies 626-550BC beats Barrold713 - Urartian 681-585BC with Skythian allies 550-301BC 65-48

Another bruising encounter with Barold. Well played.
Best regards,
Lunecastle

hidde
Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
Posts: 1769
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 6:31 am

Re: Themed Event: winners post your results here . . .

Post by hidde » Sat Feb 29, 2020 11:10 am

Group D

hidde (Viking) beat rs2excelsior (Anglo-Saxon) 62-55

(3-1)

Final positions Group D
1. hidde …………….11 points
2. Cunningcairn ..11 points
3. rs2excelsior …… 2 points

hidde and Cunningcairn tied on 11 points each so I had to use the tie-breaker looking at the two matches between them. hidde beat Cunningcairn 24-22 on the tiebreaker (by one skirmisher unit!) - stockwellpete

stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 12008
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

Re: Tournament diary and news . . .

Post by stockwellpete » Sat Feb 29, 2020 11:54 am

The Themed Event semi-final line-up is beginning to take shape now . . .

1. Winner of Group A v dkalenda
2. GDod v hidde

Brenmusik
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1155
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 5:00 pm
Location: Albion

Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .

Post by Brenmusik » Sat Feb 29, 2020 12:17 pm

Division D

Brenmusik Welsh 600-1049 AD "beats" telesien Arab,Abbasid 794-814 AD 62-61

I'm happy with a draw, the Welsh losing twice as many men.

(2-2)

cromlechi
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:29 pm

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by cromlechi » Sat Feb 29, 2020 2:18 pm

Perhaps I've misread the rules then as I thought to get a victory you had to rout the enemy. I am not really bothered about the result but not sure what the screenshot proves. Not going to rehearse this any more but where I could attack without zero chance of success I did. Perhaps Pete can explain the rules to mee.

SawyerK
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz  251/1
Posts: 141
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2018 1:16 am

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by SawyerK » Sat Feb 29, 2020 2:21 pm

Division D

SawyerK (Pyrrhic) defeated grumpdaddy845 (Greek) by 40-11.

The Greeks brought the mass of their army to bear on their right flank and their hoplites made excellent progress against the Pyrrhic's Samnite allies and cavalry but a pike unit that went pikes out managed to last three rounds to restrict Greek progress while the rest of the pikes broke through the center despite a multi-layered Greek defense.

stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 12008
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by stockwellpete » Sat Feb 29, 2020 2:38 pm

cromlechi wrote:
Sat Feb 29, 2020 2:18 pm
Perhaps I've misread the rules then as I thought to get a victory you had to rout the enemy. I am not really bothered about the result but not sure what the screenshot proves. Not going to rehearse this any more but where I could attack without zero chance of success I did. Perhaps Pete can explain the rules to mee.
The screenshot is showing Gepids lost 17% and Scots-Irish 31% so the Gepids were leading 31-17. Under Rule 5 you get "2 points - for a tie where both players score 60% or more, or for a draw where a player has scored at least 25%." So the match is drawn as neither army has broken and the Gepid player gets 2 points for scoring more than 25% and the Scots-Irish player gets 0 points for not crossing the 25% threshold. So this is a differential draw, not a victory of any kind. :wink:

Karvon
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 484
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 12:36 pm
Location: Osaka, Japan

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by Karvon » Sat Feb 29, 2020 2:49 pm

Div B

Karvon (Parthian with Arab allies) drew vs IMC (Moorish) 35 - 28 for a 2-2 score.

Moorish skirmishers came down from the hills and across the stream to play while their medium foot watched from the heights. In a long swirling duel, the Parthian horse managed to kill or chase off a bit more than we lost to the javelin barrages.

Final ending positions at nightfall

(2-2)
Attachments
Screen_00000520.jpg
Screen_00000520.jpg (866.28 KiB) Viewed 701 times

cromlechi
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:29 pm

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by cromlechi » Sat Feb 29, 2020 3:09 pm

Reading it again I put 31% against my name and 17% against questar17 to avoid confusion as it was a draw and you could see what percentage we each had. If I had just posted the score you would not be able to know who had what score. I had the last turn so thought it my duty to report. Cant see how what I posted was inaccurate thought it made it clearer. How should I have posted the result? Or should I have left it to my opponent. The method you ask for is only clear where there is a winner.


stockwellpete wrote:
Sat Feb 29, 2020 2:38 pm
cromlechi wrote:
Sat Feb 29, 2020 2:18 pm
Perhaps I've misread the rules then as I thought to get a victory you had to rout the enemy. I am not really bothered about the result but not sure what the screenshot proves. Not going to rehearse this any more but where I could attack without zero chance of success I did. Perhaps Pete can explain the rules to mee.
The screenshot is showing Gepids lost 17% and Scots-Irish 31% so the Gepids were leading 31-17. Under Rule 5 you get "2 points - for a tie where both players score 60% or more, or for a draw where a player has scored at least 25%." So the match is drawn as neither army has broken and the Gepid player gets 2 points for scoring more than 25% and the Scots-Irish player gets 0 points for not crossing the 25% threshold. So this is a differential draw, not a victory of any kind. :wink:

stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 12008
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by stockwellpete » Sat Feb 29, 2020 3:58 pm

cromlechi wrote:
Sat Feb 29, 2020 3:09 pm
Reading it again I put 31% against my name and 17% against questar17 to avoid confusion as it was a draw and you could see what percentage we each had. If I had just posted the score you would not be able to know who had what score. I had the last turn so thought it my duty to report. Cant see how what I posted was inaccurate thought it made it clearer. How should I have posted the result? Or should I have left it to my opponent. The method you ask for is only clear where there is a winner.


stockwellpete wrote:
Sat Feb 29, 2020 2:38 pm
cromlechi wrote:
Sat Feb 29, 2020 2:18 pm
Perhaps I've misread the rules then as I thought to get a victory you had to rout the enemy. I am not really bothered about the result but not sure what the screenshot proves. Not going to rehearse this any more but where I could attack without zero chance of success I did. Perhaps Pete can explain the rules to mee.
The screenshot is showing Gepids lost 17% and Scots-Irish 31% so the Gepids were leading 31-17. Under Rule 5 you get "2 points - for a tie where both players score 60% or more, or for a draw where a player has scored at least 25%." So the match is drawn as neither army has broken and the Gepid player gets 2 points for scoring more than 25% and the Scots-Irish player gets 0 points for not crossing the 25% threshold. So this is a differential draw, not a victory of any kind. :wink:
If you had posted it cromlechi (Scots-Irish) 17% v Questar17 (Gepids) 31% then I would have scored it (0-2) straight away. :wink:

I have anticipated this occasional problem since the early seasons of the FOG2DL by putting this message in the first post of each of the results threads . . .

"Please use the following format when reporting your results . . .

Division A

hidde (Romans) beat stockwellpete (Dacians) 50-25

It is very helpful to me if we all get used to reporting the results in the same way, so please report the score as 50-25 rather than 25-50. This avoids much confusion when discussing match situations by PM with regards to adjudication or some other issue regarding the rules of the tournament."

stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 12008
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .

Post by stockwellpete » Sat Feb 29, 2020 6:06 pm

Biblical A-D Tables.jpg
Biblical A-D Tables.jpg (695.08 KiB) Viewed 718 times

stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 12008
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .

Post by stockwellpete » Sat Feb 29, 2020 6:06 pm

Weekly round-up
There are still 4 players with perfect records in Division A. dkalenda (Assyrian) is top followed by harveylh (Arab), but further down the table both XLegione (Lydian) and klayeckles (Kyrenean Greeks) have 100% records. markwatson360 (Aetolian) has opened up a 7 point lead over second-placed nyczar (Spartan), who has won all his 3 matches so far and has 3 games in hand. I am expecting pompeytheflatulent (Median) to put in a challenge after securing 2 wins after an opening match defeat. In Division C baldrick52 (Kyrenean Greek) has completed his matches and sits just 4 points ahead of second-placed lunecastle (Babylonians) who has won all 5 of his matches and currently looks to be the strong favourite to win automatic promotion.

Unbeaten runs of 3 matches or more
dkalenda (Division A) 6 matches
harveylh (Division A) 4 matches
markwatson360 (Division B) 3 matches
nyczar (Division B) 3 matches
baldrick52 (Division C) 4 matches and finished
lunecastle (Division C) 5 matches

Match completion rate (45 matches in total to be played in each division)
Division A - 22 out of 45 matches completed :D
Division B - 17 out of 45 matches completed :D
Division C - 24 out of 45 matches completed :D

These are good match completion rates. :D

Player of the week
dkalenda (Division A) with 3 wins this week. :D

stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 12008
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

Re: Biblical: arrange your matches here . . .

Post by stockwellpete » Sat Feb 29, 2020 6:48 pm

Biblical A-B Charts.jpg
Biblical A-B Charts.jpg (653.3 KiB) Viewed 650 times
Biblical C-D Charts.jpg
Biblical C-D Charts.jpg (522.88 KiB) Viewed 650 times

Cunningcairn
Colonel - Ju 88A
Colonel - Ju 88A
Posts: 1550
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:05 am
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand

Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .

Post by Cunningcairn » Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:38 pm

Division B

Cunningcairn - Frankish 751-887AD beat Questar17 - Byzantine 988-1041AD with Georgian allies 1008-1049AD by 65% to 40%

ianiow
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1129
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 11:24 am
Location: Isle of Wight, UK

Re: Biblical: arrange your matches here . . .

Post by ianiow » Sat Feb 29, 2020 9:37 pm

Div A

Challenges up for:-

youngr
XLegione
Ulysisgrunt
CamelThief
desertedfox

pw=ianiow

lydianed
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Posts: 417
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 12:35 pm

Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .

Post by lydianed » Sat Feb 29, 2020 10:52 pm

Division B

lydianed (Hebrews + Egyptians) defeated IMC (Arab) 41:13.

Thanks for the game.

SnuggleBunnies
Colonel - Ju 88A
Colonel - Ju 88A
Posts: 1540
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2015 2:09 am

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by SnuggleBunnies » Sun Mar 01, 2020 3:04 am

Division A

SnuggleBunnies (Byzantine) defeats Morbio (Roman) 64-42

GG
SnuggleBunny's Field of Glory II / Medieval / Pike and Shot / Sengoku Jidai MP Channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjUQy6dEqR53NwoGgjxixLg

SnuggleBunnies
Colonel - Ju 88A
Colonel - Ju 88A
Posts: 1540
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2015 2:09 am

Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .

Post by SnuggleBunnies » Sun Mar 01, 2020 3:08 am

Division A

SnuggleBunnies (Medes) defeats XLegione (Lydian) 58-33

GG
SnuggleBunny's Field of Glory II / Medieval / Pike and Shot / Sengoku Jidai MP Channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjUQy6dEqR53NwoGgjxixLg

SnuggleBunnies
Colonel - Ju 88A
Colonel - Ju 88A
Posts: 1540
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2015 2:09 am

Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .

Post by SnuggleBunnies » Sun Mar 01, 2020 3:12 am

Division A

SnuggleBunnies (Khorasanian) defeats Geffalrus (Indian) 43-10

GG
SnuggleBunny's Field of Glory II / Medieval / Pike and Shot / Sengoku Jidai MP Channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjUQy6dEqR53NwoGgjxixLg

pompeytheflatulent
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Posts: 364
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2019 3:37 pm

Re: Early Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .

Post by pompeytheflatulent » Sun Mar 01, 2020 7:29 am

Division C

pompeytheflatulent - Byzantine 988-1041AD
challenges:
MikeMarchant - Andalusian 756-1049 AD with Navarrese allies 778-899AD

password: 12345

Post Reply

Return to “Field of Glory II Digital League”