Page 486 of 763

Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 1:23 pm
by batesmotel
Division B

batesmotel (Khorasanian with Dailami) beat devoncop (Byzantine) 42-17

Thanks for the game.

Chris

Re: Late Antiquity; winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 1:29 pm
by SnuggleBunnies
Division A

SnuggleBunnies (Jewish Revolt 66-135) defeats CheAhn (Roman 425-492) 67-34

GG

Re: Themed Event: winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 2:15 pm
by batesmotel
Division A

batesmotel (Qin) beat IMC(Han) 64-57

This was neck and neck until the end.

Chris

(3-1)

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 4:19 pm
by GeneralKostas
Division D

vakarr (Thracian 680-461 BC + allies) beat GeneralKostas (Lysimachid 320-281 BC) 60-41

Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 4:30 pm
by GeneralKostas
Division D

Challenge for :

SLancaster - Indo-Greek 175BC-10AD with Indian 500BC-319AD ally, password=lancaster, PM sent.

Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 5:59 pm
by IMC
Division B

IMC - Viking 780-899 AD with Frankish ally defeated devoncop - Byzantine 988-1041 AD with Georgian ally

devoncop surrendered: 31% v 11%

Thanks for the game.

Ian

Re: Early Middle Ages; arrange your matches here . . .

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 6:12 pm
by IMC
Hi,
Division B

New games available for

General Shapur [3.70 (2)] - Arab (Conquest) 629-637 AD

melm [8.88 (10)] - Andalusian 756-1049 AD

rbodleyscott [4.00 (3)] - Arab (Conquest) 638-684 AD

From IMC [5.14 (6)] - Viking 780-899 AD with Frankish ally

Passwords are the same for each: imcimc

See you on line.

Ian

Re: Themed Event: winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 6:30 pm
by hidde
Group D

hidde (Chinese, Zhou & Warring States 350-222 BC) beat paulmcneil (Chinese, Han 99 BC-23 AD) 65-40

Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 8:45 pm
by harveylh
Division A

harveylh – Khorasanian 821-1003 AD with Arab (Abbasid) 815-835 AD ally defeats MorkinTheFree - Polish 966-1057 AD, 43-18.

Scattered patches of rough terrain hurt the Poles as they had no effective MI.

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 8:56 pm
by Bluefin
Division C

Bluefin (Kappadokian) defeats Rob 123 (Roman) 62-50 in a battle that could've swung either way.

Thanks for the game Rob123.

(3-1)

Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:06 pm
by harveylh
Division A

harveylh – Khorasanian 821-1003 AD with Arab (Abbasid) 815-835 AD ally defeats CheAhn - Arab (Conquest) 638-684 AD, 63-50.

The Arab spearmen destroyed the Khorasanian center and their lancers burst through the Khorasanian right and took the early lead. However, on the left flank, the Khorasanian Dailamia infantry with some cavalry smashed the Arab assault and was able to finally flank the Arab center. On the right flank, the surviving Khorasanians successfully counterattacked. My gracious opponent put it best, “Allah is not with us, his light shines on the Khorasanians.” A very good game.

(3-1)

Re: Themed Event: winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 11:35 pm
by phoyle3290
Group B

phoyle3290 (Donghu 1046 BC-209 AD) defeats MikeMarchant (Wuhuan 208-201 BC) - 43-13

Re: Late Antiquity; winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 12:02 am
by Cunningcairn
Division B

Cunningcairn - Bosporan 11 BC-375 AD with Roman 24 BC–196 AD ally beat NikiforosFokas - Sassanid Persian 477-590 AD 46% to 20%

Re: Themed Event: winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 12:15 am
by phoyle3290
Group B

phoyle3290 (Chinese Han 206-100 BC) defeats Snugglebunnies (Zhou 1046-701 BC) - 58-33

Re: Themed Event: winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 1:10 am
by Nijis
Group A

1. Nijis (Chinese Zhou & Warring States 700-351 BC) defeats batesmotel (Chinese Han 200-106 BC with Wuhuan 200 BC - 200 AD allies) 62 - 49.

The battle stayed close until the very end, when cumulative 1- and 2- casualty missile shots finally autobroke enough Han-Wuhuan cavalry to win.

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 1:24 am
by Schweetness101
Division D

Schweetness101- Carthaginian (Hannibal in Africa) 202 BC defeated rs2excelsior - Roman 105-25 BC: 55-26

the battle line stretched across a low, wide plateau with a a mixture of rough, open and forested ground, slightly favoring the Carthaginian side and giving them an uphill advantage on a few tiles. Both sides cavalry went almost entirely to their respective right side. The Romans started strong with a few routs on the Carthaginian left, including the Carthaginian elephant, but their cavalry flank petered out under withering ranged fire from a mass of light foot and horse, while the Carthaginian cavalry got a few more good flanks in. The rough terrain permitted inferior Carthaginian infantry to hold out long enough for their cavalry to wrap up the roman left.

Here's an image from the end:
https://imgur.com/4fkcLgC

gg to rs2excelsior

Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 2:04 am
by ulysisgrunt
Division B
2 Games
Ulysisgrunt (Cypriot) defeated gamercb (Achaemenid Persians) 62-45
Ulysisgrunt defeated MikeMarchant (Elamite) 54-29

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 5:34 am
by Tresantes
Division C

Tresantes (Pyrrhic) defeats General Shapur (Spanish) 46-21

The Spaniards were hoping for some rough terrain, but encountered the forces of Pyrrhus on a fairly flat plain...

Re: Late Antiquity; winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:54 am
by desertedfox
Division C

desertedfox - Indian 546-599 AD defeated oscarius - Roman 197-284 AD with Armenian ally 62-58

A nail biter of a game if there ever was one.

Thx 4 a gg that could have gone either way.

(3-1)

Re: Calling grumpydaddy845 and Breogan . . .

Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:20 am
by stockwellpete
I have not heard anything from grumpydaddy845 and Breogan about these two vacancies even though they put their names down on the reserve list recently. I will approach other players today - SLancaster and Garokan for starters - and then I will advertise the vacancies on the forums. If there is anyone interested in taking up these places, either a new player, or a player with a current FOG2DL rating below 3.50, please put your name in this thread.