Optimum LF

A forum for any questions relating to army design, the army companion books and upcoming lists.

Moderators: hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

8 or 6 bases

Poll ended at Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:56 pm

8 Bases of LF, I'm also daft
20
40%
6 Bases 'cos six is better and I have an above average IQ or don't like Hammy
30
60%
 
Total votes: 50

philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8701
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Optimum LF

Post by philqw78 » Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:56 pm

What do you think is the optimum size for a LF BG? 6 or 8 bases? Please give your reason if you say six so I can beat Hammy with it. Please be incoherent or as thick as a piss stone if you vote 8.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative

batesmotel
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 3414
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:52 pm

Post by batesmotel » Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:10 pm

I voted 6 just to be agreeable ;-).

On a related note, I've been wondering for New Kingdom Egyptians whether it makes more sense to buy the MF drilled, average, unprotected Bow BGs as 6s or 8s. I originally thought that 8s would be better to avoid rounding down for the back rank firing but now I'm wondering if 6s may actually be better in terms of being able to "focus" fire more and assuming that in general one BG shouldn't be the only thing firing at its target if I really want the fire to be effective.

Chris

paulcummins
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Posts: 394
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 10:01 am
Location: just slightly behind your flank

Post by paulcummins » Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:19 pm

I voted 8 'cos 8s of LF make a mess of 6s of mf bow

or at least make them feel a bit silly

paulcummins
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Posts: 394
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 10:01 am
Location: just slightly behind your flank

Post by paulcummins » Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:20 pm

oh, and i have been drinking beer after a stupid day at work - explains any daftness

philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8701
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 » Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:21 pm

batesmotel wrote:I voted 6 just to be agreeable ;-).
and you are smarter than the average bear.
batesmotel wrote:On a related note, I've been wondering for New Kingdom Egyptians whether it makes more sense to buy the MF drilled, average, unprotected Bow BGs as 6s or 8s. I originally thought that 8s would be better to avoid rounding down for the back rank firing but now I'm wondering if 6s may actually be better in terms of being able to "focus" fire more and assuming that in general one BG shouldn't be the only thing firing at its target if I really want the fire to be effective.

Chris
I would say six, reasons
You get to spend minimum points on two BG of targets
They concentrate fire easier
Six is easier to manouver, whether to get out of the way of the homicidal libyan LF or just to wheel in small spaces or at a tighter angle
They have less chance of losing a base to shooting
2 wide they still count as 6 for hits per base
More BG in the army
phil
putting the arg into argumentative

philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8701
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 » Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:23 pm

paulcummins wrote:I voted 8 'cos 8s of LF make a mess of 6s of mf bow

or at least make them feel a bit silly
My grandma could make a mess of 6 MF bow
phil
putting the arg into argumentative

Blathergut
Field Marshal - Elefant
Field Marshal - Elefant
Posts: 5864
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
Location: Southern Ontario, Canada

Post by Blathergut » Wed Oct 21, 2009 10:50 pm

4s???

deadtorius
General - Elite King Tiger
General - Elite King Tiger
Posts: 4173
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:41 am

Post by deadtorius » Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:25 pm

All depends on the situation. I gave up my MF bows for LF bows and run them in 8's. Undrilled unarmoured MF bows could not get out of trouble so always ended up fighting something, mass LF run away when charged so I find them much better. Now if only I could actually roll some hits with them all.... :roll:

BlackPrince
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 269
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 12:34 pm

Post by BlackPrince » Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:31 pm

I use 4s as BG filler.

Blathergut
Field Marshal - Elefant
Field Marshal - Elefant
Posts: 5864
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
Location: Southern Ontario, Canada

Post by Blathergut » Thu Oct 22, 2009 12:56 am

Actually, my favourite ally for LRRomans is Numidian. The commander can bring along up to 6 4paks. They are great for targetting elephants. The LF screen can't be chased away entirely by one enemy BG charging.

expendablecinc
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 705
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:55 pm

Post by expendablecinc » Thu Oct 22, 2009 3:10 am

I take fours whenever I can - sixes when I cant and then upgrade them to eights once I have spent the rest of my points.

4 or 6 points to boost a poor BG 8 or 10 for an average group of LF by two.

anthony

KiwiWarlord
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 650
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 7:39 am
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand

LF

Post by KiwiWarlord » Thu Oct 22, 2009 6:57 am

8 for archers gets my vote.
my favourite is 4 bases of poor, Jav, Lt Spear for 2 pts.

deadtorius
General - Elite King Tiger
General - Elite King Tiger
Posts: 4173
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:41 am

Post by deadtorius » Thu Oct 22, 2009 9:04 pm

my favourite is 4 bases of poor, Jav, Lt Spear for 2 pts.
Sounds like my slingers, make them poor at 2 points a piece, since they are lights I want them to run away.

Skullzgrinda
Master Sergeant - U-boat
Master Sergeant - U-boat
Posts: 528
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 9:32 pm
Location: Dixie

Post by Skullzgrinda » Fri Oct 23, 2009 3:30 am

I voted 8 to be contrary.

I have Welsh, Huguenot, Cherokee and Confederate ancestors.

Contrary works for me.

I don't care if it works for you.

I don't know how thick a piss stone is either, but however thick it is I can beat it.

philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8701
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 » Fri Oct 23, 2009 8:21 am

:lol:
Skullzgrinda wrote:I voted 8 to be contrary.

I have Welsh, Huguenot, Cherokee and Confederate ancestors.
And obviously took the worst from all. A sheep sh*****g, garlic eating, pipe smoking, hillbilly. Now that my ignorance is out of the way I can continue
Skullzgrinda wrote:Contrary works for me.

I don't care if it works for you.
It always makes a better game if players have contrary positions.
Skullzgrinda wrote:I don't know how thick a piss stone is either, but however thick it is I can beat it.
You'd have to go to an old British pub. But they are quite thick.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative

nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger » Fri Oct 23, 2009 8:43 am

As the vote is essentially whether you agree with Hammy I felt there was only one way to vote :P
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk

philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8701
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 » Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:03 am

nikgaukroger wrote:As the vote is essentially whether you agree with Hammy I felt there was only one way to vote :P
Surely I did not frame the questions in any way that they could influence an honest and fair vote.

Perhaps I should go into politics
phil
putting the arg into argumentative

timmy1
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England

Post by timmy1 » Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:13 am

I voted 8 because 'six is better and I have an above average IQ or don't like Hammy'

The way I play, 8's is a good an excuse for my P4 W0 D0 L4 record, given my army choice for Roll Call I certainly cannot be said to have an above average IQ (even if Tim P rescues me from having to deploy such a crap army on the table by being the chosen floater) and I like Hammy. Mind you I have never actually met Hammy...

timmy1
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England

Post by timmy1 » Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:14 am

Phil

'Surely I did not frame the questions in any way that they could influence an honest and fair vote'. I must have missed any bias in the question framing, looked fair and above board to me.

Martin0112
Slitherine
Slitherine
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 8:36 am
Location: Germany

Post by Martin0112 » Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:21 am

Unfortunaly, I cannot vote for 4 bases. I don't need them big, I need plenty of them :)

Post Reply

Return to “Army Design”