FOGN errata

General discussion forum for anything related to Field of Glory Napoleonics.

Moderators: hammy, terrys, Blathergut, Slitherine Core, hammy, Blathergut, terrys, Slitherine Core

philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Re: FOGN errata

Post by philqw78 » Tue May 22, 2012 7:38 pm

phil
putting the arg into argumentative

bahdahbum
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 7:40 pm

Re: FOGN errata

Post by bahdahbum » Tue May 22, 2012 8:27 pm

I cannot get the link

dvorkin
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Posts: 410
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:23 pm

Re: FOGN errata

Post by dvorkin » Wed May 23, 2012 11:03 am

Sorry for you but it works just done

Simpleton
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz  251/1
Posts: 128
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2011 10:25 pm

Re: FOGN errata

Post by Simpleton » Sun Jul 08, 2012 9:38 pm

On page 121 the Spanish are required to have an exceptional Div commander. Was this a typo?

bahdahbum
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 7:40 pm

Re: FOGN errata

Post by bahdahbum » Mon Jul 09, 2012 4:50 pm

Army list in the rule book are just there for the fun, the show and to test . The real penisular war armies will be known in september with the second and last army list book

bahdahbum
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 7:40 pm

Re: FOGN errata

Post by bahdahbum » Sat Jul 21, 2012 6:39 pm

Russian 1812 guard : why are they no russian Jaegers in the 182 guard . You already had from 1808 the jaeger regiment ( 3 bataillons ) and the finland guard regiment ( 3 bataillons) used as jaegers as well ? they were at Borodino ( Nafziger Napoleon's Invasion of Russia ) . So why do they not appear in 1812 as they exist from 1808 ?

terrys
Panzer Corps Team
Panzer Corps Team
Posts: 4181
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:53 am

Re: FOGN errata

Post by terrys » Sun Jul 22, 2012 4:19 pm

Russian 1812 guard : why are they no russian Jaegers in the 182 guard . You already had from 1808 the jaeger regiment ( 3 bataillons ) and the finland guard regiment ( 3 bataillons) used as jaegers as well ? they were at Borodino ( Nafziger Napoleon's Invasion of Russia ) . So why do they not appear in 1812 as they exist from 1808 ?
The Russian guard jaeger regiments only had 400 men per battalion. This does't qualify them as seperate full-sized units.
They are more accurately depicted as 2 bases of a large unit (1 normal base and 1 skirmisher base). This is permitted by the list - 1 skirmisher attachment in each of 2 divisions.

Whenever a unit is made up of 2 regiments, (1 each of line and light) - or of a regiment of line and at least a full battalion of light, the best way to depict this is to use a skirmisher attachment,but place a 'normal' stand of light infantry behind it.

bahdahbum
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 7:40 pm

Re: FOGN errata

Post by bahdahbum » Sun Jul 22, 2012 4:49 pm

There is something I do not understand : 6 bataillons of 400 men ( 3 bataillons for the Jaeger regiment and 3 bataillons for the Finland regiment, this regiment being, from 1811 a light infantry regiment and not a line regiment ) , means 2400 men ( let's say 2000 ) , light infantry , formed in one brigade and you are telling me it is not enough to be classified as a brigade ....even a small one ....

in
http://www.napolun.com/mirror/napoleoni ... _guard.htm

"In 1811 the Finland Guard Regeiment became a light regiment."
(Nafziger - "Napoleon's Invasion of Russia" p 79, 1998)

Borodino :
3rd Brigade - Col. Baron Bistrom [picture]
- - - - - - - - Finnish Lifeguard Regiment [3 btns.]
- - - - - - - - Lifeguard Jäger Regiment [3 btns.]

So we have got 2 light infantry regiments , that funny enough appear in the 1813 list, but not the 1812 list ...in 1813 they were at 2 bataillons each ...but at borodino 3 bataillons each :D

terrys
Panzer Corps Team
Panzer Corps Team
Posts: 4181
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:53 am

Re: FOGN errata

Post by terrys » Mon Jul 23, 2012 3:59 pm

There is something I do not understand : 6 bataillons of 400 men ( 3 bataillons for the Jaeger regiment and 3 bataillons for the Finland regiment, this regiment being, from 1811 a light infantry regiment and not a line regiment ) , means 2400 men ( let's say 2000 ) , light infantry , formed in one brigade and you are telling me it is not enough to be classified as a brigade ....even a small one ....
Sorry - I was looking at the 1813 establishment. The Guard jagers were indeed brigaded together during the 1812 campaign - and therefore should warrant at least a small unit and possibly a large one.

The 1813-1814 list is suspect as well. Since the guard jagers were only 2 Battalions strong by then - they don't deserve to have more than a small unit - and more likely 2 attachments (1 per division).

bahdahbum
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 7:40 pm

Re: FOGN errata

Post by bahdahbum » Mon Jul 23, 2012 5:19 pm

In 1813 - 1814 there where with the guard light infantry Filand regiment , so a total of +/- 1600 soldiers ( 2 x 2 bataillons ). I guesss it might be OK and for 1812 , also a small unit as they would bsomewhere betwee 2000-2400 soldiers .

I guess in 1813, the 3erd bataillon was back in depot

Caratacus
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Posts: 27
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 3:13 pm

Re: FOGN errata

Post by Caratacus » Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:52 pm

A teeny little erratum in the Sacile list...

In Albert Gyulai's Division, the first infantry unit is shown as "Line infantry, veteran, drilled".
This doesn't fit the standard unit description - it is 'type, training, training' instead of 'type, elan, training'.
I am assuming it should be Line Infantry, Average, Drilled - but it could be intended as 'Line Infantry, Superior, drilled' or' Line Infantry,???,Veteran'

Can you please confirm the correct unit description.

terrys
Panzer Corps Team
Panzer Corps Team
Posts: 4181
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:53 am

Re: FOGN errata

Post by terrys » Wed Aug 22, 2012 8:48 am

In Albert Gyulai's Division, the first infantry unit is shown as "Line infantry, veteran, drilled".
This doesn't fit the standard unit description - it is 'type, training, training' instead of 'type, elan, training'.
I am assuming it should be Line Infantry, Average, Drilled - but it could be intended as 'Line Infantry, Superior, drilled' or' Line Infantry,???,Veteran'
They should be average/drilled

Esbenmf
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 9:18 am

Re: FOGN errata

Post by Esbenmf » Wed Oct 03, 2012 10:32 am

You might want to include the following:

viewtopic.php?f=188&t=37850

Esben

Sarmaticus
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 275
Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 4:31 pm

Re: FOGN errata

Post by Sarmaticus » Tue Jan 01, 2013 5:29 pm

Are we collecting errata for Emperors and Eagles here?
Presuming we are:
p.93
Fellahin: Max bases is = 6; min Line Infantry bases = 6; so where does a supposedly optional 4 base unit Light Infantry Skirmishers fit in?
p.115
Combined max for Dragoons & Cuirassiers is 8; min Dragoons is 4: Cuirassiers can be in a unit of 4 or_6_ bases. How is a 6 base unit possible?

philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Re: FOGN errata

Post by philqw78 » Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:23 am

Latest errata is on the FoG website
here
on the Napoleonic resources page
phil
putting the arg into argumentative

philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Re: FOGN errata

Post by philqw78 » Sat Jan 04, 2014 9:50 pm

Another version up with a New QRS as well

http://www.fieldofglory.com/fog_nap
phil
putting the arg into argumentative

deadtorius
General - Elite King Tiger
General - Elite King Tiger
Posts: 4173
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:41 am

Re: FOGN errata

Post by deadtorius » Sun Jan 05, 2014 11:15 pm

Thanks Phil, downloaded and gave them a quick look over.

bahdahbum
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 7:40 pm

Re: FOGN errata

Post by bahdahbum » Tue Jan 07, 2014 5:53 pm

a one page QRS :D weel one page has been modified

deadtorius
General - Elite King Tiger
General - Elite King Tiger
Posts: 4173
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:41 am

Re: FOGN errata

Post by deadtorius » Wed Jan 08, 2014 1:00 am

next time you guys do a revised QRS you should add to the complex move test: Advance to within 2MU of enemy while disordered.
I think its an important one that we had overlooked for over a year of playing the game :shock:

Blathergut
Field Marshal - Elefant
Field Marshal - Elefant
Posts: 5660
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
Location: Southern Ontario, Canada

Re: FOGN errata

Post by Blathergut » Tue Jan 21, 2014 12:00 am

What changed on the QRS???

Post Reply

Return to “Field of Glory : Napoleonic Era 1792-1815 : General Discussion”