Isn't that part of ancient life though , some countries were more active than others , invading other countriesericdoman1 wrote:I can understand why the top players have to play one another. Games may well be closer and so players below can catch up.
Due to the number of army options a "top" player could make a wrong choice againsta nother player and really struggle.
As there are 12 players we could have 4 differetn opponnets for Springa nd Summer then the 3 players you haven't yet played, you play agst in Autumn.
There would still be a random draw based on whom you play
The difficulty is making sure we all play different players in that year.
I do not like the idea of some players having more games than others though?
making enemies , growing bigger or getting plundered into poverty.I feel that's more of a campaign , if you try
and even out the matchs it becomes more of a tournament.It seems to work out balanced in TTAL .
The Lost world Tournament was like that and about 8 players
invaded Pantherboy's territory , he defeated all of them , got rich and became immortal.
While others got beaten into non-existence.
Just my 2 pennies worth
Cheers
Ian