Blathergut vs RKR (2.01.32)(Axis Spies Not Welcome!)
Moderators: Happycat, rkr1958, Slitherine Core
-
- Field Marshal - Elefant
- Posts: 5875
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
- Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
Blathergut vs RKR (2.01.32)(Axis Spies Not Welcome!)
First turn typical: casualties in Poland but some inflicted on the German forces
-
- Field Marshal - Elefant
- Posts: 5875
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
- Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
-
- Field Marshal - Elefant
- Posts: 5875
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
- Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
-
- Field Marshal - Elefant
- Posts: 5875
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
- Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
-
- General - Carrier
- Posts: 4745
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:13 pm
- Location: Oslo, Norway
The PP's will only be returned if you sail from friendly port to friendly port. If you land the unit from outside a port or into an enemy hex then you won't get the PP's back.
This will also help the Axis reinforce Libya, Norway and Finland. The main reason for the change is to have USA send reinforcements from USA to Britain in preparation of Overlord instead of launching long range invasions. You lose efficiency per turn at sea now so it's important to get the units back to land to rebuild the efficiency and maybe upgrade before making an invasion across the English Channel.
Now you won't be penalized for doing this. Before you saved 8 PP's per unit for making a long range invasion.
This will also help the Axis reinforce Libya, Norway and Finland. The main reason for the change is to have USA send reinforcements from USA to Britain in preparation of Overlord instead of launching long range invasions. You lose efficiency per turn at sea now so it's important to get the units back to land to rebuild the efficiency and maybe upgrade before making an invasion across the English Channel.
Now you won't be penalized for doing this. Before you saved 8 PP's per unit for making a long range invasion.
-
- Major - 8.8 cm FlaK 36
- Posts: 959
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 4:13 pm
-
- Field Marshal - Elefant
- Posts: 5875
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
- Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
-
- Field Marshal - Elefant
- Posts: 5875
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
- Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
-
- Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 12:29 pm
- Location: Helsinki, Finland
Assuming you've been rowing around with the ships to provide escort and used 3 (or 4, when was 3rd UK FTR built, btw?) fighter + STR almost every turn of Fall Gelb it's not that surprising. Until Iraq joins up the only source is Turner Valley with very little production due to low war effort.Blathergut wrote: Can someone explain why my oil is down to 585? The only thing using oil has been the 3 fighters (and they've been repairing every other turn during the invasion of France) and the TAC.
-
- Major - 8.8 cm FlaK 36
- Posts: 959
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 4:13 pm
You don´t have to worrie about oil with the allies. I have never ran out no matter how huge my army has been....PionUrpo wrote:Assuming you've been rowing around with the ships to provide escort and used 3 (or 4, when was 3rd UK FTR built, btw?) fighter + STR almost every turn of Fall Gelb it's not that surprising. Until Iraq joins up the only source is Turner Valley with very little production due to low war effort.Blathergut wrote: Can someone explain why my oil is down to 585? The only thing using oil has been the 3 fighters (and they've been repairing every other turn during the invasion of France) and the TAC.
-
- Field Marshal - Elefant
- Posts: 5875
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
- Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
Unless Axis goes for Middle East in great force while waiting until 1942 for Barbarossa. I had that as Allies and I exahusted my oil reserves before the end of 1943.Crazygunner1 wrote:You don´t have to worrie about oil with the allies. I have never ran out no matter how huge my army has been....PionUrpo wrote:Assuming you've been rowing around with the ships to provide escort and used 3 (or 4, when was 3rd UK FTR built, btw?) fighter + STR almost every turn of Fall Gelb it's not that surprising. Until Iraq joins up the only source is Turner Valley with very little production due to low war effort.Blathergut wrote: Can someone explain why my oil is down to 585? The only thing using oil has been the 3 fighters (and they've been repairing every other turn during the invasion of France) and the TAC.
-
- Field Marshal - Elefant
- Posts: 5875
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
- Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
-
- Field Marshal - Elefant
- Posts: 5875
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
- Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
-
- Field Marshal - Elefant
- Posts: 5875
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
- Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
Ronnie invited me to read a couple postings in his AAR. Comments:
rkr4: I agree that the southern shift of the panzers was a mistake as far as Moscow was concerned. In this game, I was attempting to swing everything north and leave the south basically empty. In hindsight, perhaps a line should have gone in front of Moscow but given the strength of the Germans there, it all would have died. The CEaW generals out there could offer their suggestions perhaps. I figured Ronnie was driving for Moscow, though he did well at keeping the full extent out of sight until the final swarming.
rkr7: The plan wasn’t so much take Finland as cause some troops to be diverted north to Leningrad but he stuck to his plan, curse him!!
rkr8: As above in #4...it came very early and weather held just long enough. Even around Moscow, where troops simply sat the entire time with a leader, efficiency never got to any worthwhile point. Whether a few more troops (like mech in Moscow instead of the infantry) would have made much difference, I’ll leave to the skilled ones to comment.
rkr9: We were waiting for the mud.
rkr10: See? Here’s where I’d never have thought of that!! Didn’t even strike me I could have killed the 1-step and railed something heavy in.
Other: I had thought of tossing stuff in the way to slow down, but thought we would just see droves die from the mass of German forces concentrated there since efficiency was so horrible. The thought was to attack down from the Leningrad area, mangling the infantry and putting pressure on the stuff holding around Moscow.
rkr4: I agree that the southern shift of the panzers was a mistake as far as Moscow was concerned. In this game, I was attempting to swing everything north and leave the south basically empty. In hindsight, perhaps a line should have gone in front of Moscow but given the strength of the Germans there, it all would have died. The CEaW generals out there could offer their suggestions perhaps. I figured Ronnie was driving for Moscow, though he did well at keeping the full extent out of sight until the final swarming.
rkr7: The plan wasn’t so much take Finland as cause some troops to be diverted north to Leningrad but he stuck to his plan, curse him!!
rkr8: As above in #4...it came very early and weather held just long enough. Even around Moscow, where troops simply sat the entire time with a leader, efficiency never got to any worthwhile point. Whether a few more troops (like mech in Moscow instead of the infantry) would have made much difference, I’ll leave to the skilled ones to comment.
rkr9: We were waiting for the mud.
rkr10: See? Here’s where I’d never have thought of that!! Didn’t even strike me I could have killed the 1-step and railed something heavy in.
Other: I had thought of tossing stuff in the way to slow down, but thought we would just see droves die from the mass of German forces concentrated there since efficiency was so horrible. The thought was to attack down from the Leningrad area, mangling the infantry and putting pressure on the stuff holding around Moscow.
-
- Field Marshal - Elefant
- Posts: 5875
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
- Location: Southern Ontario, Canada