More competitions in 2017 without the 50:50 rule?
Moderators: terrys, Slitherine Core, FOGR Design
-
- Major - Jagdpanther
- Posts: 1065
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 6:54 pm
- Location: Alderholt, Near Ringwood, Dorset, UK
- Contact:
More competitions in 2017 without the 50:50 rule?
Is possible please there can be more of the major 15mm competitions (BHGS, Campaign, warfare stc) without the 50:50 rule on superiors/elites please? I feel it is starting to stifle army selections, including all mounted lists. I do understand it was introduced to restrict min/max armies, but I think we are drifting too far the other way...
Currently I believe it is only Britcon and 25mm themes where you can look to bring an army without the 50:50 rule...
Even being this weekends 25mm mini competition where it was even brought in for that one.
Peoples thoughts?
Currently I believe it is only Britcon and 25mm themes where you can look to bring an army without the 50:50 rule...
Even being this weekends 25mm mini competition where it was even brought in for that one.
Peoples thoughts?
Proelium: Wargaming rules for 3000B.C. - 1901A.D.
Hordes of Models and Buckets of Dice
Web: www.quickplayrules.com
Social: www.facebook.com/quickplayrules
Twitter: @quickplayrules
Hordes of Models and Buckets of Dice
Web: www.quickplayrules.com
Social: www.facebook.com/quickplayrules
Twitter: @quickplayrules
-
- Field of Glory Moderator
- Posts: 10287
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
- Location: LarryWorld
Re: More competitions in 2017 without the 50:50 rule?
nigelemsen wrote:Is possible please there can be more of the major 15mm competitions (BHGS, Campaign, warfare stc) without the 50:50 rule on superiors/elites please? I feel it is starting to stifle army selections,
In what way do you think it is stifling army selections?
Asking as I have no concept of what is being chosen as I have more or less been away from gaming for a couple of years.
FWIW I think it probably has reasonable historical basis (and I wish we'd written the lists more along those lines for mounted), however, given it has been an add to to the lists as published I appreciate there may well be unintended consequences.
Nik Gaukroger
"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith
nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith
nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
-
- Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
- Posts: 485
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2014 9:58 am
Re: More competitions in 2017 without the 50:50 rule?
Not sure if it's the final word on competition rules, Nigel, but the 2017 Burton Doubles announcement on this forum, doesn't appear to have that rule (just that heavy/medium artillery must be put down first). I'm thinking of taking 1632 Swedes.....
"No plan survives the first contact with the dice."
"There is something wrong with our bloody dice today!"
"There is something wrong with our bloody dice today!"
Re: More competitions in 2017 without the 50:50 rule?
'Wayof The Warriors' did not, but did have major limits on minima for warriors and maxima for cavalry.
-
- Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
- Posts: 485
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2014 9:58 am
Re: More competitions in 2017 without the 50:50 rule?
Rather than making a lame pun about being "cutting edge", I shall merely enquire as to whether you intend to follow up this year's success, by holding it again next year?
"No plan survives the first contact with the dice."
"There is something wrong with our bloody dice today!"
"There is something wrong with our bloody dice today!"
Re: More competitions in 2017 without the 50:50 rule?
Too right, but probably a week later so we don't clash with games expo or half term!
-
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
- Posts: 3002
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 5:15 am
- Location: London, UK
- Contact:
Re: More competitions in 2017 without the 50:50 rule?
With Hoofmeister Harley not playing as much, perhaps there is an argument for letting it slide a little..?
http://www.madaxeman.com
Holiday in Devon? Try https://www.thecaptainscottagebrixham.com
Holiday in Devon? Try https://www.thecaptainscottagebrixham.com
-
- Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
- Posts: 485
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2014 9:58 am
Re: More competitions in 2017 without the 50:50 rule?
To be fair - and I've only been playing in tournaments just over two years - I can't recall Alasdair using (m)any souped-up armies. It was usually the numbers that got you in the end. And the camels.
"No plan survives the first contact with the dice."
"There is something wrong with our bloody dice today!"
"There is something wrong with our bloody dice today!"
-
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
- Posts: 3002
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 5:15 am
- Location: London, UK
- Contact:
Re: More competitions in 2017 without the 50:50 rule?
Games Expo also now being The Challenge...madlemmey wrote:Too right, but probably a week later so we don't clash with games expo or half term!
http://www.madaxeman.com
Holiday in Devon? Try https://www.thecaptainscottagebrixham.com
Holiday in Devon? Try https://www.thecaptainscottagebrixham.com
-
- Field of Glory Moderator
- Posts: 10287
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
- Location: LarryWorld
Re: More competitions in 2017 without the 50:50 rule?
Interesting.
Nik Gaukroger
"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith
nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith
nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
-
- Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
- Posts: 600
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 1:40 pm
Re: More competitions in 2017 without the 50:50 rule?
Mounted armies get hit far worse by 50/ 50 rule as 4's of cavalry dont work and 6's are to expensive, whereas 6's of foot do work
Re: More competitions in 2017 without the 50:50 rule?
I have been watching these restrictions being brought in from Australia with concern.
As most here in Melbourne know I play a similar style in all periods in all rules.
If you put your 5 guns on an angle defensively and they never fire and my 6 or 8 guns are pushed forward [ with risk]
But they fire all game , don't blame the rules.
You will lose
Small superior armies need a plan and are risky.
If you want vanilla armies shuffling forward with no plan bring in all these stupid restrictions.
Anyone can take whatever they like. Or just ban mounted armies.
Or don't play those rules.
I think the term is bums on seats.
As most here in Melbourne know I play a similar style in all periods in all rules.
If you put your 5 guns on an angle defensively and they never fire and my 6 or 8 guns are pushed forward [ with risk]
But they fire all game , don't blame the rules.
You will lose
Small superior armies need a plan and are risky.
If you want vanilla armies shuffling forward with no plan bring in all these stupid restrictions.
Anyone can take whatever they like. Or just ban mounted armies.
Or don't play those rules.
I think the term is bums on seats.
Re: More competitions in 2017 without the 50:50 rule?
Not sure to many of us will agree with this.alasdair2204 wrote:Mounted armies get hit far worse by 50/ 50 rule as 4's of cavalry dont work and 6's are to expensive, whereas 6's of foot do work
It is your combination of mounted, dragoons and artillery that is so effective, so I think any discussion must include all three troop types and their inter- action with other troop types.
If that combination was so effective, why did all the armies of the period have so much infantry.
As I said in another post on here, I think it is time for a refresh.
Don
-
- Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
- Posts: 600
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 1:40 pm
Re: More competitions in 2017 without the 50:50 rule?
My issue is not much has been done about the all infantry armies which are just as unhistorical and to be fair cavalry armies have never dominated the competition circuit other than those used by me and it seems odd that these restrictions target one type of army, to bee fair I never use artillery in the earlier period
Re: More competitions in 2017 without the 50:50 rule?
I only used to play 3 or 4 day I period 25mmgames until I joined league of ancients club and saw Vikings fighting assyrians
Fantasy. Good fun. Not a simulation
But when people go down this historical path they are kidding
themselves
There were mounted armies and there was artillery
In dbmm should bastarnae be f or x at the moment
Just have printed rules with no stick ons and maybe new people will play
Fantasy. Good fun. Not a simulation
But when people go down this historical path they are kidding
themselves
There were mounted armies and there was artillery
In dbmm should bastarnae be f or x at the moment
Just have printed rules with no stick ons and maybe new people will play
-
- Major-General - Tiger I
- Posts: 2379
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:21 am
- Location: Derbyshire, UK
Re: More competitions in 2017 without the 50:50 rule?
This is true. As a competition organiser my aim is to try to provide as good an experience as possible for as many people as possible, because that ensures that people will continue to come. The principle aim of themes is to provide variety so that players are not seeing the same players and armies at each tournament. The aim has never been to punish specific players, but the reality is that if people see what they consider to be a winning formula they will try to replicate it. They won't do it as well, but people not following the formula will end up playing a succession of games against very samey armies. Interestingly, Britcon, the competition that Jon mentions above, is one that has very few restrictions and therefore gives the best indication of how things go. In the last 2 years 20/24 and 15/18 armies have been from WoR or D&G i.e. 5/6 of the armies came from 1/3 of the available books, and 1/3 of the available time period.I think the term is bums on seats.
I'll agree that we may have been a bit slow on this one, but the themes on which I've had an input this year (Roll Call 15mm, Challenge, Warfare) have all included minima for mounted as well as any other restrictions.My issue is not much has been done about the all infantry armies which are just as unhistorical
-
- Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
- Posts: 485
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2014 9:58 am
Re: More competitions in 2017 without the 50:50 rule?
Because real horses were harder to find, and much harder to paint?donm2 wrote: If that combination was so effective, why did all the armies of the period have so much infantry?
I find the insistence on a maximum of 4-packs of cavalry in some army lists quite contrived (and wrong historically), especially in the last half-century covered by the rules. I think the point made by the other poster about superior troops limiting the size of your army - and its break point - is a valid one; so, too, is the use of cavalry 6-packs, which do the same thing. By all means insist on an historical basis and rules of deployment for any army entered into a competition, but if someone can produce an historical precedent for their army, let it stand.
"No plan survives the first contact with the dice."
"There is something wrong with our bloody dice today!"
"There is something wrong with our bloody dice today!"
-
- Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
- Posts: 485
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2014 9:58 am
Re: More competitions in 2017 without the 50:50 rule?
I think there are a number of issues causing that "log-jam" that aren't really related to the rules - one is the Anglo-centricity of wargaming: ECW and Anglo-Dutch are far-and-away the most common armies I've encountered from those two books; second, pretty much everyone I know who plays FoG:R has an ECW/TYW army (or can borrow one from Bob Medcraft!); another is that DoG armies can "double-up" as later WSS/Marlburian for other rules; a fourth is the paucity of information and ranges of figures for non-European armies for this period - having used one (kindly lent to me by Don Avis), I would love to have a generic mid-16thC Indian force capable of being adapted to any of the main types, but finding helpful books is difficult and I'm not a fan of any of the three main post-Ancient Indian figure ranges (Two Dragons, Essex, or Frei Korps).kevinj wrote: Interestingly, Britcon, the competition that Jon mentions above, is one that has very few restrictions and therefore gives the best indication of how things go. In the last 2 years 20/24 and 15/18 armies have been from WoR or D&G i.e. 5/6 of the armies came from 1/3 of the available books, and 1/3 of the available time period.
"No plan survives the first contact with the dice."
"There is something wrong with our bloody dice today!"
"There is something wrong with our bloody dice today!"
Re: More competitions in 2017 without the 50:50 rule?
I tried all the various Indian armies in the early days of FoGR and then put them away.
They only come out now in themed competitions that don't include any Europeans.
Being one of the people who have voted with their feet, my comments were my attempt to help.
Don
They only come out now in themed competitions that don't include any Europeans.
Being one of the people who have voted with their feet, my comments were my attempt to help.
Don