The Dustbin

Moderator: Field of Glory 2 Tournaments Managers

Cunningcairn
Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D
Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D
Posts: 1248
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:05 am
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand

Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Post by Cunningcairn » Tue Jun 11, 2019 6:31 pm

Div A

Challenges posted for
klayeckles - Achaemenid Persian 419-329 BC
ruskicanuk - Indo-Greek 175-10 BC

PW - your username in lower case.

PM sent

Cunningcairn
Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D
Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D
Posts: 1248
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:05 am
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand

Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Post by Cunningcairn » Tue Jun 11, 2019 7:22 pm

Div A

Challenge posted for youngr - Roman 219-200 BC. PW youngr

PM sent

devoncop
Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D
Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D
Posts: 1359
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:46 am

Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here

Post by devoncop » Tue Jun 11, 2019 7:54 pm

Div B

devoncop (Dailami) beat Youngr (Sassanid Persians) 60% to 31%.

The hilly rocky desert map with a stream through the middle did the Persian Jumbo's no favours at all.

Thanks to Youngr for a great battle against the odds !
Last edited by devoncop on Wed Jun 12, 2019 2:36 pm, edited 2 times in total.

deve
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Posts: 91
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2018 2:32 am

Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .

Post by deve » Tue Jun 11, 2019 8:00 pm

Div B

deve (Persian) - General Shapur (Carthage) 61-55

gg

(3-1)

youngr
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 461
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 8:10 am
Location: Presteigne

Re: Early Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .

Post by youngr » Tue Jun 11, 2019 8:14 pm

youngr wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:06 pm
Division A

youngr (Sassanind) challenges rbodleyscott (Franks with Viking lackies), PM sent.

youngr (Sassanind) challenges nijis (Abbasid Arab), PM sent.

youngr (Sassanind) challenges MorkinTheFree (Romano-British), PM sent.

PW = snorky

Cheers
Richard
Sorry, that should be Division B!!!

Barrold713
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 297
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2015 12:34 am
Location: Michigan, U.S.A.

Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .

Post by Barrold713 » Tue Jun 11, 2019 11:35 pm

Division B for Brave

Barrold713 and my rich Corinthian leather defeats General Shapur's Carthaginians 45-19

I will take the win, but if it had lasted another turn or so the score would have turned against me. Thanks for the match

BDH

rexhurley
Major - Jagdpanther
Major - Jagdpanther
Posts: 1034
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:33 am

Re: Themed Event: winners post your results here . . .

Post by rexhurley » Tue Jun 11, 2019 11:57 pm

Group 3

rexhurley (romans) defeats Morbio (Macedonian) 43/10

General Shapur
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 259
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:25 pm
Location: Perth, Australia

Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .

Post by General Shapur » Wed Jun 12, 2019 1:05 am

Division B

General Shapur - Carthaginian 550-411 BC defeats uneducated - Hebrew 681-586 BC - 43-14

Thanks for an enjoyable game
Look back over the past, with its changing empires that rose and fell, and you can foresee the future, too. M.A.

General Shapur
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 259
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:25 pm
Location: Perth, Australia

Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Post by General Shapur » Wed Jun 12, 2019 8:46 am

Div D

General Shapur - Kingdom of Soissons 461-486 AD challenges
eobrian2 - Kushan 130 BC-478 AD
lydianed - Gepid 493-567 AD
phoyle3290 - Jewish Revolt 66-135 AD
Rob123 - Romano-British 407-599 AD
SawyerK - Ptolemaic 55-30 BC

password 4321 - PM sent
Look back over the past, with its changing empires that rose and fell, and you can foresee the future, too. M.A.

desertedfox
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 1:07 pm

Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here

Post by desertedfox » Wed Jun 12, 2019 12:06 pm

Div C

desertedfox - Byzantine 988-1041 AD defeated Rob123 - Indian 320-545 AD 49 to 12.

Thx for a quick but none the less interesting game Rob.

Geffalrus
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 698
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2019 3:06 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here

Post by Geffalrus » Wed Jun 12, 2019 12:09 pm

devoncop wrote:
Tue Jun 11, 2019 7:54 pm
Div B

devoncop (Dailami) beat Youngr (Achaemenid Persians) 60% to 31%.

The hilly rocky desert map with a stream through the middle did the Persian Jumbo's no favours at all.

Thanks to Youngr for a great battle against the odds !
I think you mean - Sassanid - Persians. :wink:

sunnyboy
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz  251/1
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2018 12:16 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here

Post by sunnyboy » Wed Jun 12, 2019 12:53 pm

Division B

sunnyboy (Byzantine 740-903AD) beat devoncop (Dailami 928-1055 AD & Khorasanian 821-1003 AD Allies) 64-46

The fortunes of both sides waxed and waned over the course of the battle; the advantage early was with the Dailami who won the cavalry fight. However, the Byzantine skoutatoi crushed their opponents in the centre of the field and began plodding across the map trying to catch their nimbler opponents. Fortuitously on turn 24, the sole remaining unit of Tagmata lancers was able flank and rout a unit of Ghilman and a unit of light cavalry reaching the magical 60% at the death.

Thanks for an enjoyable game!

SpeedyCM
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Posts: 303
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 4:42 am
Location: Australia

Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here

Post by SpeedyCM » Wed Jun 12, 2019 2:44 pm

Division B

SpeedyCM - (Rus 960-1053 AD & Polish 966-1057 AD allies) defeated devoncop (Dailami 928-1055 AD & Khorasanian 821-1003 AD Allies) 45-12

stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10906
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Contact:

The Allies poll is now closed . . . 21-7 in favour of their introduction next season

Post by stockwellpete » Wed Jun 12, 2019 2:50 pm

This is a no-brainer as far as I am concerned. The Allies feature is an excellent addition to FOG2 and I would recommend that we roll it out right across the tournament from Season 6. This season it is just being trialled in Early Middle Ages. The poll will run for 2 weeks and players may change their vote if they wish to.

devoncop
Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D
Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D
Posts: 1359
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:46 am

Re: Poll on new "Allies" feature

Post by devoncop » Wed Jun 12, 2019 2:56 pm

100% Yes from me.

Geffalrus
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 698
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2019 3:06 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Re: Poll on new "Allies" feature

Post by Geffalrus » Wed Jun 12, 2019 3:54 pm

I like the option, even if there will be times when I will choose not to have allies for various reasons.

Edit: I will, of course, be lobbying for the Antigonids to get some Greek allies. :wink:
Last edited by Geffalrus on Wed Jun 12, 2019 4:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

SnuggleBunnies
Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D
Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D
Posts: 1253
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2015 2:09 am

Re: Poll on new "Allies" feature

Post by SnuggleBunnies » Wed Jun 12, 2019 3:59 pm

The one problem I see with the feature is that it can make armies less unique. For example the Viking army tends to be based on heavy infantry shieldwalls. Pick French allies, however, and you have effective heavy infantry and an effective heavy cavalry wing. Is increasing this level of army flexibility desirable? I'm not sure, it depends on what people are looking for in league play...

Geffalrus
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 698
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2019 3:06 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Re: Poll on new "Allies" feature

Post by Geffalrus » Wed Jun 12, 2019 4:03 pm

SnuggleBunnies wrote:
Wed Jun 12, 2019 3:59 pm
The one problem I see with the feature is that it can make armies less unique. For example the Viking army tends to be based on heavy infantry shieldwalls. Pick French allies, however, and you have effective heavy infantry and an effective heavy cavalry wing. Is increasing this level of army flexibility desirable? I'm not sure, it depends on what people are looking for in league play...
It might make certain mono-chromatic army lists a bit more competitive or at least more likely to find use in the league. I'd consider the Illyrian list if it had access to Greek or Gallic allies providing heavy cavalry and/or heavy infantry.

cromlechi
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Posts: 443
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:29 pm

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by cromlechi » Wed Jun 12, 2019 5:57 pm

Division C

cromlechi - Scots-Irish 50 BC - 476 AD defeats Doyley50 - Roman 24 BC-196 AD score = 61-38

Good game, Romans got caught from two side in the end which proved decisive but put up a good fight.

IMC
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Posts: 315
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Hampshire

Re: Themed Event: winners post your results here . . .

Post by IMC » Wed Jun 12, 2019 6:34 pm

Hi folks

Group 2 "The Wars of Alexander" (334-323 BC)

2. IMC (Macedonian 355-329 BC) beat 4. XLegione (Achaemenid Persian 419-329 BC) 44% v 19%

Thanks for the game

IMC

Post Reply

Return to “Field of Glory II Digital League”