Good fun. I was 28-8 up at one time but for every unit defeated 2 more took its place. Arabs = the ultimate giant wall of crap!
The Dustbin
Moderator: Field of Glory 2 Tournaments Managers
Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Div C
lydianed (Byzantine) challenges Najanaja (Romans + german friends) pw: najanaja
PM sent
lydianed (Byzantine) challenges Najanaja (Romans + german friends) pw: najanaja
PM sent
-
- Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:35 am
- Location: Australia
Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Division B
Challenge for phoyle3290 (Carthaginian) vs Najanaja (Pontic)
PW = phoyle
Challenge for phoyle3290 (Carthaginian) vs Najanaja (Pontic)
PW = phoyle
-
- Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
- Posts: 456
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2015 12:34 am
- Location: Michigan, U.S.A.
Re: Tournament diary and news . . .
I had problem with the mod but it was fixed by changing the zip file extraction program I used to unpack the .RAR
BDH
BDH
-
- Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D
- Posts: 1293
- Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 4:59 pm
- Location: The California Central Coast Wine Country
Re: Late Antiquity; winners post your results here . . .
Division D
Ulysisgrunt (Kingdom of Soissons) defeated Okie (Roman) 15-0
Okie conceded.
MATCH VOID UNDER RULE 6
Ulysisgrunt (Kingdom of Soissons) defeated Okie (Roman) 15-0
Okie conceded.
MATCH VOID UNDER RULE 6
-
- Field of Glory Moderator
- Posts: 14500
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Re: Tournament diary and news . . .
Okie has now withdrawn completely from the tournament leaving vacancies in Classical Antiquity, Late Antiquity, Early Middle Ages and Biblical. I will begin contacting reserves today and I hope to have the places filled again by the weekend. All results involving Okie, and matches currently in progress, are now Void and will be expunged from the records under Rule 6 of the Competition.
The vacancies have now been offered to the following players . . .
Classical Antiquity - SLancaster
Late Antiquity - Garokan
Early Middle Ages - grumpydaddy845
Biblical - Breogan
The vacancies have now been offered to the following players . . .
Classical Antiquity - SLancaster
Late Antiquity - Garokan
Early Middle Ages - grumpydaddy845
Biblical - Breogan
-
- 1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
- Posts: 768
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:07 pm
- Location: Hamble, UK
- Contact:
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Div B
paulmcneil Galatians beat Najanaja Pontics 65:35
As with all these games of warbands vs pike armies under the latest rules release, comes down to are the warbands subject to double drops and who gets the most rallies from rout (between closely matched players) stochastic considerations with fat tails replacing skill.
paulmcneil Galatians beat Najanaja Pontics 65:35
As with all these games of warbands vs pike armies under the latest rules release, comes down to are the warbands subject to double drops and who gets the most rallies from rout (between closely matched players) stochastic considerations with fat tails replacing skill.
Paul McNeil
-
- Field of Glory Moderator
- Posts: 14500
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Calling Garokan . . .
Edited message 14/10
You have a PM regarding a further vacancy in the tournament - this time in Early Middle Ages Division D. Please let me know asap if you want to play in this section as well.
You have a PM regarding a further vacancy in the tournament - this time in Early Middle Ages Division D. Please let me know asap if you want to play in this section as well.
-
- Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:05 am
- Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .
-
- Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:05 am
- Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Re: Themed Event: winners post your results here . . .
Group C
Cunningcairn (Chinese, Han 99 BC-23 AD) beat Triarii (Qiang 700-201 BC) 46% to 4%
Triarii (Chinese, Han 99 BC-23 AD) beat Cunningcairn (Qiang 700-201 BC) 51% to 24%
Han Chinese victorious in both games.
Cunningcairn (Chinese, Han 99 BC-23 AD) beat Triarii (Qiang 700-201 BC) 46% to 4%
Triarii (Chinese, Han 99 BC-23 AD) beat Cunningcairn (Qiang 700-201 BC) 51% to 24%
Han Chinese victorious in both games.
-
- Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:05 am
- Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Div A
Cunningcairn - Ptolemaic 55-30 BC with Roman 105-25 BC ally beat Sennacherib - Pergaméne 190-129BC with Greek ally 227-146BC by 49% to 18%
Cunningcairn - Ptolemaic 55-30 BC with Roman 105-25 BC ally beat Sennacherib - Pergaméne 190-129BC with Greek ally 227-146BC by 49% to 18%
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division A
CheAhn (Arab) beat Sennacherib (Andalusian) 49-13
cheers
CheAhn (Arab) beat Sennacherib (Andalusian) 49-13
cheers
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division C
oscarius (Rus) beat markwatson360 (Frankish) 62-46
Advantageous terrain and narrow frontage helped me to hold my left flank long enough for the rest of my forces to defeat their foes and come to their aid. Even so it was a gruelling drawn-out bloodbath between two similarly compiled forces. Amusingly a 15 point rabble that was able to single-handedly pin down Mark's own flanking force for about four turns (and inflict a surprising amount of casualties too) might have won me the watch. Great match thanks
oscarius (Rus) beat markwatson360 (Frankish) 62-46
Advantageous terrain and narrow frontage helped me to hold my left flank long enough for the rest of my forces to defeat their foes and come to their aid. Even so it was a gruelling drawn-out bloodbath between two similarly compiled forces. Amusingly a 15 point rabble that was able to single-handedly pin down Mark's own flanking force for about four turns (and inflict a surprising amount of casualties too) might have won me the watch. Great match thanks
Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
SawyerK (Roman 199-106 BC with Spanish ally) challenges Kifi (Macedonian 320-261 BC with Greek ally). Password is 'Mace'.
-
- Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D
- Posts: 1203
- Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2019 3:06 pm
- Location: Virginia, USA
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division A
Geffalrus (Antigonid) defeated harveylh (Syracuse with Carthaginian Allies) 43 to 12
Taking a page from the Morkin of Epirus strategy book, the Antigonids opted to bring maximum medium and light infantry to support their pike phalanx. Expecting the Syracusans to occupy the strong defensive terrain in their zone, the Antigonids were duly surprised when the large mass of Syracusan hoplites rolled forward on the attack with elephants and cavalry in support. Redeployed Thureos arrived just in time to prevent a massive outflanking of the pike phalanx as it engaged the hoplites frontally. While the Carthaginian cavalry did eventually make it to the open space behind the Antigonid formation, the hoplite holding force was undone by a series of poor cohesion rolls before any rear charges could be organized.
Good game to my opponent.
Geffalrus (Antigonid) defeated harveylh (Syracuse with Carthaginian Allies) 43 to 12
Taking a page from the Morkin of Epirus strategy book, the Antigonids opted to bring maximum medium and light infantry to support their pike phalanx. Expecting the Syracusans to occupy the strong defensive terrain in their zone, the Antigonids were duly surprised when the large mass of Syracusan hoplites rolled forward on the attack with elephants and cavalry in support. Redeployed Thureos arrived just in time to prevent a massive outflanking of the pike phalanx as it engaged the hoplites frontally. While the Carthaginian cavalry did eventually make it to the open space behind the Antigonid formation, the hoplite holding force was undone by a series of poor cohesion rolls before any rear charges could be organized.
Good game to my opponent.
We should all Stand With Ukraine.
Re: Late Antiquity; winners post your results here . . .
Division C
oscarius (Romans) beats DzonVejn (Sassanid Persians) 56 - 16
Right from the get-go things went poorly for the Persians who gambled upon an all cavalry and elephant force. The Roman massed bow (a mixture of imperial and Armenian found some nice rough ground to occupy) and alongside the artillery drowned the Persian cataphracts in fire. Their lighter cousins also managed to outshoot the Persian horse who either dispersed across the map and played little role or unwisely pursued the foot into the entrenched bowmen (and when then swiftly hacked down by supporting Roman infantry). By far the most serious threat proved to be the six units of Persian elephants who even the legionaries had a tough time dealing with and managed to score a few routs. However Roman numerical superiority meant that inevitably these elephants, lacking any support, ended up flanked
Thanks for the game, it was a short and sharp one where both terrain and army composition worked in my favour.
oscarius (Romans) beats DzonVejn (Sassanid Persians) 56 - 16
Right from the get-go things went poorly for the Persians who gambled upon an all cavalry and elephant force. The Roman massed bow (a mixture of imperial and Armenian found some nice rough ground to occupy) and alongside the artillery drowned the Persian cataphracts in fire. Their lighter cousins also managed to outshoot the Persian horse who either dispersed across the map and played little role or unwisely pursued the foot into the entrenched bowmen (and when then swiftly hacked down by supporting Roman infantry). By far the most serious threat proved to be the six units of Persian elephants who even the legionaries had a tough time dealing with and managed to score a few routs. However Roman numerical superiority meant that inevitably these elephants, lacking any support, ended up flanked
Thanks for the game, it was a short and sharp one where both terrain and army composition worked in my favour.
-
- Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:05 am
- Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .
Div A
Cunningcairn - Hebrew 681-586 BC with Egyptian 664-571 BC ally beat youngr - Median 626-550 BC with Babylonian Ally by 64% to 36%
Cunningcairn - Hebrew 681-586 BC with Egyptian 664-571 BC ally beat youngr - Median 626-550 BC with Babylonian Ally by 64% to 36%
Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .
2 games played and 2 games lost! Oh dear...must do better!Cunningcairn wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 3:14 pm Div A
Cunningcairn - Hebrew 681-586 BC with Egyptian 664-571 BC ally beat youngr - Median 626-550 BC with Babylonian Ally by 64% to 36%
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division A
youngr (Italian Hill tribes) beat Cunningcairn (Ptolemaic with Roman Ally) 60-28
Cheers
Richard
youngr (Italian Hill tribes) beat Cunningcairn (Ptolemaic with Roman Ally) 60-28
Cheers
Richard
-
- 1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
- Posts: 768
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:07 pm
- Location: Hamble, UK
- Contact:
Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .
Div B
paulmcneil Thracians beat gamercb Achaemenids 49:24
paulmcneil Thracians beat gamercb Achaemenids 49:24
Paul McNeil