The Dustbin
Moderator: Field of Glory 2 Tournaments Managers
-
- 1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
- Posts: 768
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:07 pm
- Location: Hamble, UK
- Contact:
Re: Classical Antiquity recruitment is now open . . .
i'm in pete armies to follow
Saka + Seleucids
Armenian (Tigranes) +Pontic
Galatian 62 + Roman 105
Lydian 550
(Armies checked 22/9, OK, Season 8: Etruscan/Samnite - stockwellpete)
Saka + Seleucids
Armenian (Tigranes) +Pontic
Galatian 62 + Roman 105
Lydian 550
(Armies checked 22/9, OK, Season 8: Etruscan/Samnite - stockwellpete)
Paul McNeil
-
- 1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
- Posts: 768
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:07 pm
- Location: Hamble, UK
- Contact:
Re: Themed Event recruitment is now open . . .
I'm signed up for the other 4 leagues, but happy to join this if numbers permit.
Paul McNeil
-
- General - Elite King Tiger
- Posts: 4333
- Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:17 pm
- Location: Stockholm, SWEDEN
FOG2DL given clean bill of health by Slitherine review . . .
Surely every player in the DL should be able and willing to confirm that cheating in any scope or scale is not OK? Would such a confirmation (explicit , in addition to being part of the DL rules) make you feel comfortable? At least no one can then plead ignorance.
kronenblatt's campaign and tournament thread hub:
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
-
- Field of Glory Moderator
- Posts: 14500
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Re: FOG2DL given clean bill of health by Slitherine review . . .
Not necessary. Players who enter the FOG2DL are assumed to be honest and trustworthy. If we find the occasional player who does not respect the rest of the community then we will remove them as quickly as we are able to.kronenblatt wrote: ↑Wed Sep 16, 2020 12:09 pm Surely every player in the DL should be able and willing to confirm that cheating in any scope or scale is not OK? Would such a confirmation (explicit , in addition to being part of the DL rules) make you feel comfortable? At least no one can then plead ignorance.
Re: Classical Antiquity recruitment is now open . . .
I'm in.
1) Roman 105-25 BC with Numidian allies
2) Carthaginian (Hannibal in Africa) 202 BC
3) Numidian or Moorish 55 BC- 6 AD with Roman allies
4) Ptolemaic 55-30 BC with Roman allies
(Armies checked 22/9, OK, Season 8: dne - stockwellpete)
1) Roman 105-25 BC with Numidian allies
2) Carthaginian (Hannibal in Africa) 202 BC
3) Numidian or Moorish 55 BC- 6 AD with Roman allies
4) Ptolemaic 55-30 BC with Roman allies
(Armies checked 22/9, OK, Season 8: dne - stockwellpete)
Last edited by hidde on Tue Sep 22, 2020 6:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: FOG2DL given clean bill of health by Slitherine review . . .
The problem is that a cheat can say that freely and still cheat, we're still having to trust them. I do prefer to start by trusting that players believe that without them having to state it and then act if someone doesn't live up to that, hopefully this new system will be better at acting on any problems that may arise and will reassure players like swuul that they can have a good, fair game.kronenblatt wrote: ↑Wed Sep 16, 2020 12:09 pmSurely every player in the DL should be able and willing to confirm that cheating in any scope or scale is not OK? Would such a confirmation (explicit , in addition to being part of the DL rules) make you feel comfortable? At least no one can then plead ignorance.
-
- General - Elite King Tiger
- Posts: 4333
- Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:17 pm
- Location: Stockholm, SWEDEN
Re: FOG2DL given clean bill of health by Slitherine review . . .
stockwellpete wrote: ↑Wed Sep 16, 2020 12:20 pm Not necessary. Players who enter the FOG2DL are assumed to be honest and trustworthy. If we find the occasional player who does not respect the rest of the community then we will remove them as quickly as we are able to.
All well and fine to trust people (I like that!). However, (i) why then have controls at all, in the first place, and (ii) people may not be fully aware of what's considered "cheating" and what's not (that's what I meant by "ignorance") so that would be a way of enlighten them and make them ask any questions if they're in doubt or in need of clarification. May avoid problems and misunderstandings later on. But as you say, Pete, maybe it's not necessary (don't want to rewake the sleeping bears here... ).Blagrot wrote: ↑Wed Sep 16, 2020 12:30 pm The problem is that a cheat can say that freely and still cheat, we're still having to trust them. I do prefer to start by trusting that players believe that without them having to state it and then act if someone doesn't live up to that, hopefully this new system will be better at acting on any problems that may arise and will reassure players like swuul that they can have a good, fair game.
kronenblatt's campaign and tournament thread hub:
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
Re: Classical Antiquity recruitment is now open . . .
1. Carthaginian (Hannibal in Africa) 202 BC
2. Gallic 300-101 BC with Samnite 355-272 BC ally
3. Pyrrhic 280-275 BC with Samnite 355-272 BC ally
4. Pontic (84-47BC) + Armenian (Tigranes) (83-69BC) allies
Harvey
(Armies checked 26/9, OK, Season 8: Ptolemaic/Roman - stockwellpete)
2. Gallic 300-101 BC with Samnite 355-272 BC ally
3. Pyrrhic 280-275 BC with Samnite 355-272 BC ally
4. Pontic (84-47BC) + Armenian (Tigranes) (83-69BC) allies
Harvey
(Armies checked 26/9, OK, Season 8: Ptolemaic/Roman - stockwellpete)
Last edited by harveylh on Sat Sep 26, 2020 2:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
We should all Stand With Ukraine.
Re: Biblical recruitment is now open . . .
Happy for the opportunity. Paired matches look like fun.
Harvey
Harvey
We should all Stand With Ukraine.
Re: Themed Event recruitment is now open . . .
Happy for the opportunity.
Harvey
Harvey
We should all Stand With Ukraine.
Re: Early Middle Ages recruitment is now open . . .
1. Frankish 751-887 AD with Croatian 625-849 AD allies
2. Welsh 600-1049 AD with Anglo-Danish allies
3. Fatimid Egyptian 978-1073 AD
4. German 888-932 AD with Magyar allies (830-1049)
Harvey
2. Welsh 600-1049 AD with Anglo-Danish allies
3. Fatimid Egyptian 978-1073 AD
4. German 888-932 AD with Magyar allies (830-1049)
Harvey
Last edited by harveylh on Fri Sep 25, 2020 10:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
We should all Stand With Ukraine.
Re: Classical Antiquity recruitment is now open . . .
SSB
1. Roman 199-106 BC with Pergamene 262-191 BC allies
2. Carthaginian (Hannibal in Africa) 202 BC
3. Ptolemaic 320-218 BC
4. Samnite 355-272 BC with Italian Hill Tribes 490-275 BC allies
(Armies checked 16/9, OK, Season 8: dne - stockwellpete)
1. Roman 199-106 BC with Pergamene 262-191 BC allies
2. Carthaginian (Hannibal in Africa) 202 BC
3. Ptolemaic 320-218 BC
4. Samnite 355-272 BC with Italian Hill Tribes 490-275 BC allies
(Armies checked 16/9, OK, Season 8: dne - stockwellpete)
-
- Sr. Colonel - Battleship
- Posts: 1655
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 12:36 pm
- Location: Osaka, Japan
Re: Early Middle Ages recruitment is now open . . .
Please count me in. My preference for this section is 1200 pts.
1 Arab (Conquest) 629-637 AD
2 Indian (Hindu South) 600-1049 AD with Hindu North allies
3 Sassanid Persian 591-628 AD with Arab Bedouin allies
4 Scots 851-1051 AD with Viking 790-899 AD allies
(Armies checked 25/9, OK, Season 8: dne - stockwellpete)
1 Arab (Conquest) 629-637 AD
2 Indian (Hindu South) 600-1049 AD with Hindu North allies
3 Sassanid Persian 591-628 AD with Arab Bedouin allies
4 Scots 851-1051 AD with Viking 790-899 AD allies
(Armies checked 25/9, OK, Season 8: dne - stockwellpete)
Last edited by Karvon on Fri Sep 25, 2020 12:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Classical Antiquity recruitment is now open . . .
I'm in , armies to follow
1) Samnite (355-272BC) with Gallic (300-101BC)
2) Carthaginian (Hannibal in Africa) 202 BC
3) Skythian or Saka 550-301 BC with Greek 460-281 BC
4) Syracusan 280-211 BC with Carthaginian 235-146 BC
(Armies checked 22/9, OK, Season 8: Ptolemaic/Roman - stockwellpete)
1) Samnite (355-272BC) with Gallic (300-101BC)
2) Carthaginian (Hannibal in Africa) 202 BC
3) Skythian or Saka 550-301 BC with Greek 460-281 BC
4) Syracusan 280-211 BC with Carthaginian 235-146 BC
(Armies checked 22/9, OK, Season 8: Ptolemaic/Roman - stockwellpete)
Last edited by random27 on Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:12 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Early Middle Ages recruitment is now open . . .
I'm in , armies to follow
1) Viking (Ireland) 900-1049 AD 38-9-35 with Scots (851-1051AD)
2) Khorasanian (821-1003 AD) with Arab, Abbasid (836-873AD)
3) Frankish 751-887 AD with Croatian 625-849 AD allies
4) Scots 851-1051 with Viking (Ireland) 900-1049
(Armies checked 22/9, OK, Season 8: German/French - stockwellpete)
Preference for 1600 but no problem with 1200
1) Viking (Ireland) 900-1049 AD 38-9-35 with Scots (851-1051AD)
2) Khorasanian (821-1003 AD) with Arab, Abbasid (836-873AD)
3) Frankish 751-887 AD with Croatian 625-849 AD allies
4) Scots 851-1051 with Viking (Ireland) 900-1049
(Armies checked 22/9, OK, Season 8: German/French - stockwellpete)
Preference for 1600 but no problem with 1200
Last edited by random27 on Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:14 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Late Antiquity recruitment is now open . . .
I'm in , armies to follow
1) Roman 285-312 AD with Arab (Bedouin) 300-636 AD
2) Parthian 250 BC - 225 AD with seleucid 166-125 BC
3) Bosporan 11 BC-375 AD with Romans 24BC-196 AD
4) Arab (City) 300-633 AD with Sassanid Persian 477-590 AD
(Armies checked 22/9, OK, Season 8: Slav/Germanic FT - stockwellpete)
1) Roman 285-312 AD with Arab (Bedouin) 300-636 AD
2) Parthian 250 BC - 225 AD with seleucid 166-125 BC
3) Bosporan 11 BC-375 AD with Romans 24BC-196 AD
4) Arab (City) 300-633 AD with Sassanid Persian 477-590 AD
(Armies checked 22/9, OK, Season 8: Slav/Germanic FT - stockwellpete)
Last edited by random27 on Mon Sep 21, 2020 3:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.