The Dustbin
Moderator: Field of Glory 2 Tournaments Managers
Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Division A
Nosy_Rat (10) - Pontic 84-47 BC with Armenian (Tigranes) 83-69 BC allies challenges:
Questar17 (1) - Carthaginian (Hannibal in Italy) 218-217 BC
Triarii (5) - Carthaginian (Hannibal in Italy) 216-103BC with Samnite 355-272 BC allies
PW = "league"
Nosy_Rat (10) - Pontic 84-47 BC with Armenian (Tigranes) 83-69 BC allies challenges:
Questar17 (1) - Carthaginian (Hannibal in Italy) 218-217 BC
Triarii (5) - Carthaginian (Hannibal in Italy) 216-103BC with Samnite 355-272 BC allies
PW = "league"
Re: Early Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Division A
Nosy_Rat (1200) (10) - Spanish 900-1049 AD with Andalusian 756-1049 AD allies challenges:
CheAhn (1600) (3) - Sassanid 591-628 AD
XLegione (1200) (-) - Arab Conquest 638-684 AD
PW is "league".
Nosy_Rat (1200) (10) - Spanish 900-1049 AD with Andalusian 756-1049 AD allies challenges:
CheAhn (1600) (3) - Sassanid 591-628 AD
XLegione (1200) (-) - Arab Conquest 638-684 AD
PW is "league".
-
- Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2016 4:59 pm
- Location: Greece
Re: Themed Event: winners post your results here . . .
Pool A Group 1
NikiforosFokas (Greek) defeats Triari (Thessalian), 62-29 %.
NikiforosFokas (Thessalian) defeats Triari (Greek), 50-21%.
Triari was highly unlucky in both of these games since most of his generals felt in the battle. Really bad luck.
Thanks for the games and congrats to ianiow.
Final standings
1. ianiow P4 - 11pts
2. NikiforosFokas P4 - 9pts
3. Triarii P4 - 4 pts
ianiow has qualified for the knock out stage.
NikiforosFokas (Greek) defeats Triari (Thessalian), 62-29 %.
NikiforosFokas (Thessalian) defeats Triari (Greek), 50-21%.
Triari was highly unlucky in both of these games since most of his generals felt in the battle. Really bad luck.
Thanks for the games and congrats to ianiow.
Final standings
1. ianiow P4 - 11pts
2. NikiforosFokas P4 - 9pts
3. Triarii P4 - 4 pts
ianiow has qualified for the knock out stage.
For Byzantium!!
-
- 2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
- Posts: 740
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 12:47 am
Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Division A
challenges posted for:
Cunningcairn (2) - Roman 105-25 BC with Numidian or Moorish 55 BC- 6 AD allies
hidde (7) - Numidian or Moorish 55 BC-6 AD with Roman 24 BC-196 AD allies
Nosy_Rat (10) - Pontic 84-47 BC with Armenian (Tigranes) 83-69 BC allies
nyczar (3) - Pyrrhic 280-275 BC with Samnite 355-272 BC allies
Questar17 (1) - Carthaginian (Hannibal in Italy) 218-217 BC
Triarii (5) - Carthaginian (Hannibal in Italy) 216-103BC with Samnite 355-272 BC allies
pw is the first 5 letters of your name (no spaces special letters or caps)
challenges posted for:
Cunningcairn (2) - Roman 105-25 BC with Numidian or Moorish 55 BC- 6 AD allies
hidde (7) - Numidian or Moorish 55 BC-6 AD with Roman 24 BC-196 AD allies
Nosy_Rat (10) - Pontic 84-47 BC with Armenian (Tigranes) 83-69 BC allies
nyczar (3) - Pyrrhic 280-275 BC with Samnite 355-272 BC allies
Questar17 (1) - Carthaginian (Hannibal in Italy) 218-217 BC
Triarii (5) - Carthaginian (Hannibal in Italy) 216-103BC with Samnite 355-272 BC allies
pw is the first 5 letters of your name (no spaces special letters or caps)
-
- Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2020 8:34 am
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division F
Darkwater247 - Gepid 493-567 defeats PepeSlitherine - Sarmatian 25-375 AD 40-10
A lancer match up, The samatian had the better lancers on paper, and I was worried I had over spent on skirmishers (I had alot). Luck was with me though and I won more 1 v 1 lancers fights than I should have, the sarmatians flanking units couldn't get into the battle before the end (another turn or two and they would have been behind my lines routing me). Luck was indeed with me this day!. Thankyou Pepe for the game.
Darkwater247 - Gepid 493-567 defeats telesien - Roman 24-196 AD with Jewish 64 BC-6 AD allies 61-47
Wow this was a close game, the lancers managed to take care of the lesser units, but once the bigger boys arrived it was a hard fought slog. Some great banter throughout the game, and we both commented on how great the FOG2 online community is!
Darkwater247 - Gepid 493-567 defeats PepeSlitherine - Sarmatian 25-375 AD 40-10
A lancer match up, The samatian had the better lancers on paper, and I was worried I had over spent on skirmishers (I had alot). Luck was with me though and I won more 1 v 1 lancers fights than I should have, the sarmatians flanking units couldn't get into the battle before the end (another turn or two and they would have been behind my lines routing me). Luck was indeed with me this day!. Thankyou Pepe for the game.
Darkwater247 - Gepid 493-567 defeats telesien - Roman 24-196 AD with Jewish 64 BC-6 AD allies 61-47
Wow this was a close game, the lancers managed to take care of the lesser units, but once the bigger boys arrived it was a hard fought slog. Some great banter throughout the game, and we both commented on how great the FOG2 online community is!
-
- Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2020 8:34 am
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division F
carpenkm - Norman 923-1040 AD with French 888-1049 AD allies beat Darkwater247 - Scots 851-1051 AD with Viking 900-1049 AD allies 71-33
My poor scots are taking a real beating in the league. I made some blunders with my flanks in this one, and Carpenkm, took them brillantly, sweeping through my lines, somehow I was hanging on (1% away form the 25) I nearly managed to get them to 40% but it wasn't to be! Again a great person to play and despite my blunders are really good game.
carpenkm - Norman 923-1040 AD with French 888-1049 AD allies beat Darkwater247 - Scots 851-1051 AD with Viking 900-1049 AD allies 71-33
My poor scots are taking a real beating in the league. I made some blunders with my flanks in this one, and Carpenkm, took them brillantly, sweeping through my lines, somehow I was hanging on (1% away form the 25) I nearly managed to get them to 40% but it wasn't to be! Again a great person to play and despite my blunders are really good game.
-
- Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2020 8:34 am
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your result here . . .
Division F
Darkwater247 - Samnite with Gallic allies defeats Angel42052 - Achaemenid Persian 40-8%
The persian cav went on a flanking run, luckly the sammies managed to get into the battlelines and finish the persians before there cav could arrive. If the cav had arrived it would have been a very different game. Thankyou Angel42052 for the game
Darkwater247 - Samnite with Gallic allies defeats Angel42052 - Achaemenid Persian 40-8%
The persian cav went on a flanking run, luckly the sammies managed to get into the battlelines and finish the persians before there cav could arrive. If the cav had arrived it would have been a very different game. Thankyou Angel42052 for the game
Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Div E
snooky51 (Parthian 250 BC-225 AD with Arab 312 BC-299 AD allies) challenges random27 (Roman 285-312 AD with Arab [Bedouin] 300-636 AD allies)
pw: tetrarch
PM sent
snooky51 (Parthian 250 BC-225 AD with Arab 312 BC-299 AD allies) challenges random27 (Roman 285-312 AD with Arab [Bedouin] 300-636 AD allies)
pw: tetrarch
PM sent
-
- 1st Lieutenant - 15 cm sFH 18
- Posts: 818
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 3:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division C
SLancaster (Roman 197-284 AD) defeated cromlechi (Pictish 210-476 AD with Anglo-Saxon 449-599 AD allies). 62-39.
A hard fight with both armies going for it. The Romans managed to hold the centre and then push on. Good luck in your coming battles!
SLancaster (Roman 197-284 AD) defeated cromlechi (Pictish 210-476 AD with Anglo-Saxon 449-599 AD allies). 62-39.
A hard fight with both armies going for it. The Romans managed to hold the centre and then push on. Good luck in your coming battles!
YouTube channel for Field of Glory 2: Ancients and Medieval.
https://www.youtube.com/@simonlancaster1815
https://www.youtube.com/@simonlancaster1815
-
- Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:05 am
- Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your result here . . .
Division A
Cunningcairn - Roman 105-25 BC with Numidian or Moorish 55 BC- 6 AD ally beat hidde - Numidian or Moorish 55 BC-6 AD with Roman 24 BC-196 AD allies 40% to 15%
Cunningcairn - Roman 105-25 BC with Numidian or Moorish 55 BC- 6 AD ally beat hidde - Numidian or Moorish 55 BC-6 AD with Roman 24 BC-196 AD allies 40% to 15%
Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .
Div D
bomber23 [Skythian/Saka] defeated SawyerK [Medians] 63-37
bomber23 [Skythian/Saka] defeated SawyerK [Medians] 63-37
-
- Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
- Posts: 640
- Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2019 9:37 pm
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division E
TomoeGozen (Byzantine with Arab allies) defeated Morat (French with Viking allies) 54 - 26.
A fairly straight forward line up of lancers vs lancers with me not having any time for my cavalry to get any shots off meant it was very much ' luck of the dice' at the beginning. Fortunately my guys held and the couple of elite Klibanophoroi started to make a difference. I was also able to sneak a couple of unit around the right flank thanks to the forest I had anchored my line on. In the end the lines slogged away at each other long enough for my flank units to do the damage.
Thanks to Morat for an entertaining game in which , really ,anything could have happened.
TomoeGozen (Byzantine with Arab allies) defeated Morat (French with Viking allies) 54 - 26.
A fairly straight forward line up of lancers vs lancers with me not having any time for my cavalry to get any shots off meant it was very much ' luck of the dice' at the beginning. Fortunately my guys held and the couple of elite Klibanophoroi started to make a difference. I was also able to sneak a couple of unit around the right flank thanks to the forest I had anchored my line on. In the end the lines slogged away at each other long enough for my flank units to do the damage.
Thanks to Morat for an entertaining game in which , really ,anything could have happened.
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Thanks for a great game and what a tough opponent. Never gave up! if it wasnt for the early exchanges you probably would have won. We will meet again when I suspect your revenge will be swift and painful!!Darkwater247 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 4:08 pm Division F
carpenkm - Norman 923-1040 AD with French 888-1049 AD allies beat Darkwater247 - Scots 851-1051 AD with Viking 900-1049 AD allies loses to 71-33
My poor scots are taking a real beating in the league. I made some blunders with my flanks in this one, and Carpenkm, took them brillantly, sweeping through my lines, somehow I was hanging on (1% away form the 25) I nearly managed to get them to 40% but it wasn't to be! Again a great person to play and despite my blunders are really good game.
-
- Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:05 am
- Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division B
Cunningcairn - German 933-1049 AD with Polish 966-1057 AD allies beat IMC - Khorasanian 821-1003 AD with Dailami 928-1055 AD allies 60% to 29%
Cunningcairn - German 933-1049 AD with Polish 966-1057 AD allies beat IMC - Khorasanian 821-1003 AD with Dailami 928-1055 AD allies 60% to 29%
-
- 1st Lieutenant - 15 cm sFH 18
- Posts: 818
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 3:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your result here . . .
Division B
SLancaster (Roman 199-106 BC with Greek 227-146 BC allies) defeated GDod (Jewish 163-111 BC). 67-48.
A game where the Romans made a big comeback. I was 15-20 points down and slowly clawed my way back into it. GDod had a super set-up and I am sure he will bash up a few armies in this division. Best of luck.
SLancaster (Roman 199-106 BC with Greek 227-146 BC allies) defeated GDod (Jewish 163-111 BC). 67-48.
A game where the Romans made a big comeback. I was 15-20 points down and slowly clawed my way back into it. GDod had a super set-up and I am sure he will bash up a few armies in this division. Best of luck.
YouTube channel for Field of Glory 2: Ancients and Medieval.
https://www.youtube.com/@simonlancaster1815
https://www.youtube.com/@simonlancaster1815
Re: Warg1 has won Biblical Division D!
Well done cobber
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division C
Stew101 (Franks, with Breton allies) beat Ulysisgrunt (Welsh, with Anglo Dane). Score 45:11.
Thanks for the game.
Stew101 (Franks, with Breton allies) beat Ulysisgrunt (Welsh, with Anglo Dane). Score 45:11.
Thanks for the game.
Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .
Division D
kraff (Median 836-627 BC) defeated Barrold713 (Skythian 750-551 BC): 49-20
kraff (Median 836-627 BC) defeated Barrold713 (Skythian 750-551 BC): 49-20
-
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 6:56 pm
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division C
MorkinThe Free - Polish 966 AD-1057 AD defeated Najanaja - Indian (Rajput) 650-1049 AD with score 45-4
MorkinThe Free - Polish 966 AD-1057 AD defeated Najanaja - Indian (Rajput) 650-1049 AD with score 45-4