So this was my last run at the grand campaign east (moving on to other games now...maybe do PC2 soon) on general setting. I needed all 32 turns to achieve a decisive victory in Berlin with no loss and 13 turns to destroyed all 3 russian generals in redux (out of 40 turns, i wonder why there is 40 tu...

Before i read this forum this game was more complex and more fun. after breaking down all mechanics it becomes routine i think. plus as mentioned above AI is not that great. for the most games i have played the key to success is understanding AI logic. If you know that + the composition of AI force...

I hear you, but to each his own. I'd rather play other video games in the end (or build scale models). But that's me. Yes being meticulous and ingenious can allow you or anyone to achieve the mastery of the game. I also want to point out that in this game the AI is particularly mediocre and never le...

Me, i played the game at pretty much every difficulty settings. I think the default intended setting is colonel, which gives a good challenge without being too hard (You'll get there eventually, don't worry) However playing at general or field marshall or even the three special difficulty level afte...

Like i wrote, not a replacement but more choices on the interface, personally, the moving dotted white circle when i click my units is a big turn off.

To add a different cursor, the white dotted circle that turns around our unit to the game? Adding another option(s) to the existent one, for example by going to option UI interface i could choose a thin colored highlight instead of the white circle. Another option i would like to have is the removal...

Thank you guys, i will give it a try after i'm done with pathfinder kingmaker

Thanks for the feedback.

I'm a bit worried because back in time, i loved panzer general 1 and 2 but hated panzer general 3.

Besides the interface, is there any meaningful differences?

I'm asking because, i'm wondering if i will simply play more or less the same game with a different interface.
i got over 1000 hours into PzC I.

Thanks.

1080 ti, something like 11gbs?

So all the silliness in PC unit statistics (HA, SA, etc.) have been conveyed to PC2 ? That's my question...i don't feel like changing all the stats with an editor again

So basically values have been coded for game play value only, nothing to do with historical armor thickness or shell penetration ?

I'm resuscitating a very old thread, but how do the values look like in PK2 ? are they for game play only or are based on historical values?

You said, "where as in ancient Roman Times, the average Roman at some point in their history...only lived long enough till their early to mid 20's...they had a harsh and brutal environment." Which is completely false and silly. Do your research. Men and women if not killed in battles or died at birt...

"I'm 65 Years of Age, but look like I'm only 50 years of Age and still feel great! (No grey hair, wrinkles or anything). Don't fret',...many people are now living into their early 90's...so you still have a way's to go yet~...where as in ancient Roman Times, the average Roman at some point in their ...

Personally i keep him in a stuka upgraded to maximum stars available. 15 Strudel takes out any tank underneath his bomber, they're simply gone! But later on in the war, i switch him into the Hs 129, to destroy any soft targets just as easily.

The Brummbar is full of ammo, with +1 or +2 range it's very useful AND well armoured.

I'd be glad to be part of the testing.

the soft cap is super silly because in 1944/45 the Russian horde charge at you with endless over strength units with 400+ experience. Duh. So, if you keep a bunch of PzIV, they'll get wiped out easily. i finished the grand campaign (east) on general setting, and it was a Pita, although i managed to ...

from this source, http://fw190.hobbyvista.com/earlyjg51190s.htm

it appears the FW190A-3 was the first to see combat on the eastern front around 10ish September 1942,, as the A-4s were received only in February 1943.