I know it is late to change anything for the in-game mechanics. But I want to share an opinion about how the multiplayer experience can become better. I love the game, but I have caught myself avoiding multiplayer, playing only the campaigns. Why? Because most of my games, there is a hill and someo...

[/quote]

That is a great idea and would indeed solve the problem of corner sitting but It would also effect the choice of armies.

SLancaster wrote: ↑

Sun Feb 14, 2021 2:22 am

For the record, I am 1000% behind NikiforosFokas.

[/quote]

Thanks guys!

The battlefield itself was the objective in Ancient Warfare, was not it? From a propaganda point of view, perhaps, in a drawn battle, but in reality the objective was to put the enemy to flight, and kill as many as possible in the pursuit, to stop them from reforming as a cohesive force. I can not ...

rbodleyscott wrote: ↑

Sat Feb 13, 2021 4:25 pm

NikiforosFokas wrote: ↑

Sat Feb 13, 2021 4:10 pm

Ps: Do you know if there is the same mode in the Fog2: MEdieval ?

Yes, there is.

Thanks Richard. It is time to buy it .
ps: Thanks again to pompey. This is indeed a much better way to play the game.

The game mode 'Advance Guard' already contains most of what you are looking for. Currently it suffers from two small drawbacks: 1) Force selection is mostly automatic, I think you only get to decide what units to buy for a small fraction of your points, the rest is pre-selected. and 2) The game pla...

Thanks for the answer, Richard.
The battlefield itself was the objective in Ancient Warfare, was not it?
But I fully understand the difficulties of a suggestion like this.
I hope in the future (FoG III ? ) you will be able to find a way to force the players to give the battle.

Thanks for the replies, but the point of the post was not how I could play the way I like. This was an idea how a game about tactical battles will force the players to give a battle.

I know it is late to change anything for the in-game mechanics. But I want to share an opinion about how the multiplayer experience can become better. I love the game, but I have caught myself avoiding multiplayer, playing only the campaigns. Why? Because most of my games, there is a hill and someon...

Div B
NikiforosFokas - Byzantine 963-987 AD with Armenian 885-1045 AD allies (1200) vs. paulmcneil - Rus 960-1053 AD with Bulgar (Danube) 852-1018 AD allies (1600), PW: 1234
Alson sent by pm

Geffalrus, My answer is no; sadly, they are not better. Prof: The Byzantine Infantry of the 10th century. In reality, these boys and their mixed formation was a big reason behind the success of the byzantine armies of Nikiforos Fokas, John Tzimisces, and Basil II. In-game terms...I am sure you know....

I am in—either point.
1) Byzantine 963 with Armenian allies
2)Armenian 885 with Byzantine 963 allies
3)Fatimids
4)Abbasids 794-814

Thanks!

Armies checked, OK 27/1

We will make an announcement once everything is finalised but it will be about general systems and not details. Partly as these could help people to game the system and partly as they are going to be subject to change without notice. The issue is as we're reviewing different games there are differe...

Thanks to Pete
Merry Christmas to everyone.

Aetius have not until now created the game.

Thanks

Hello,
While I receive without problem emails when my opponent plays his turn in other Slitherine's games (eg. Field of Glory 2), I do not receive them in Sanctus Reach. Do I have to do something about this ?

Will we have another one?

Guys I am sorry but I will be able to start the games on Monday. Sorry for the delay.

Hello,

I will attacke olins' XIII area using my Armenian Allies.
Provinces at stake (XIII and XII vs V and XVI).

My dear friend, Sadly the "update" of FoG1 in Unity in fact destroyed the game. There are still some players who play the game (look at the forum for fog1http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=84 ) but since slitherine sells the non-working unity version it is truly hard now to enjoy the ga...