Division A

Schweetness101 – Carthaginian, Hannibal in Italy 216-203 BC with Samnite 355-272 BC allies defeats Triarii - Jewish (64BC-6AD) with Roman (105BC-25BC) allies 49:24

gg to triarii

JC_von_Preussen wrote: ↑

Sat Jul 11, 2020 10:42 am

Hi, I've read the full changelog list and this really sounds promissing.

great! thanks for your interest. let me know if you want to play an mp game with it sometime

Division B

Schweetness101 - Byzantine 551-578 AD defeats cromlechi - Roman 379-424 AD 47:21

Division A

Schweetness101 – Carthaginian, Hannibal in Italy 216-203 BC with Samnite 355-272 BC allies defeats harveylh - Ptolemaic 55-30 BC with Roman 105-25 BC allies 72:48

gg to harvey

Although not completed, I figured I should make a more permanent home for this mod here with a single, easier to take in list of all of the features and changes, rather than the longer and more confusing version by version changelist of the original thread in the much busier main forum. download for...

See FrenchDude's post from yesterday in this thread: https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=477&t=98555&start=40 I suspected he was working on something, but other than linking Empires to the TT Mod I don't know what he is trying to achieve. interesting! maybe I'll wait to see what he com...

I actually had high hopes that FoG: Empires would fill this need. Unfortunately the portion of the game that translates units from Empires to FoG2 was handled extremely poorly, with generic units in Empires that often translated into something completely different in FoG2. Sometimes 1 unit becomes ...

Div B

Schweetness101 - Byzantine 551-578 AD
defeats
cromlechi - Roman 379-424 AD
47-21

gg to cromlechi

In a way it's odd that Early Middle Ages has larger armies than Classical, when historically I imagine it would generally be the opposite based on what we know of army sizes. yeah this as well, larger classical armies would feel more historical than large early middle ages armies, but I do like EMA...

I'd also like to see large battles for classical antiquity, because although medium size is fun they tend to feel more like large skirmishes than full battles. It looks like most people prefer a balance of sizes across eras though. Perhaps if classical antiquity was made large one of the others tha...

Division A Schweetness101 - Andalusian 756-1049 AD defeats dkalenda - Byzantine 988-1041 AD 48-23 the map was heavily in my favor, where my side had a large open plain, flanked by dense forests that were in turn protected by mountains, and all of that behind a severely disordering stream. With super...

Division A Schweetness101 – Carthaginian, Hannibal in Italy 216-203 BC with Samnite 355-272 BC allies defeats dkalenda - Pontic 110-85 BC 47:18 the game opened with both armies facing one another across a flat plain on the Carthaginian left (left side of below picture), but the Pontic forces immedia...

I'd also like to see large battles for classical antiquity, because although medium size is fun they tend to feel more like large skirmishes than full battles. It looks like most people prefer a balance of sizes across eras though. Perhaps if classical antiquity was made large one of the others that...

what about making the right flank more vulnerable than the left in close combat? If you look for modding ideas : what about a huge mod with cavemen, aliens, Napoleonic soldiers, galleys or whatever else ? You’re good at modding. Warhammer Fantasy or Lord of the Rings total conversion please! :lol: ...

Soldiers have their shields on their left, so advancing on the left flank would expose yourself to fire on your unshielded side. And it is a lot easier for mounted troops to fire arrows or throw javelins to the left across the body vs to the right. Of course none of this applies in game. do you thi...

Soldiers have their shields on their left, so advancing on the left flank would expose yourself to fire on your unshielded side. And it is a lot easier for mounted troops to fire arrows or throw javelins to the left across the body vs to the right. Of course none of this applies in game. do you thi...

Version 1.3 download: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/903dosc5fdt8049/AABzMsF7aVuMaGqMp0RuyuXta?dl=0 compared to version 1.2 (not to A and B above) this version's change list is below: 1) Don't need to be at as great an advantage to get the reduction in charge refuse chance for combat advantage 2) UI now...

Division A Schweetness101 - Andalusian 756-1049 AD defeats Sennacherib - Arab Conquest 638-684 AD 61:46 opening moves here: https://i.imgur.com/auL42zM.jpg that wide left flank with tons of cav didn't really work as it was rebuffed by the Arab veteran spears, light lancers, massed archers and muslim...

One thing I would think could be suitable is for routed units to still stand a chance of being rallied if within 4 squares of its commanding SG or the C-in-C (or maybe any friendly general), but with a reduced likelihood of the cohesion test taking place (maybe same level as the general test in van...

Basically something like this then? Anarchy: Disciplined. Anarchy: Undisciplined. Anarchy: Exempt. yes Maybe the In Command and Out of Command should then not be shown at all for lights , since it's not applicable to them? the issue with this is that being in and out of command still matters for li...