Search found 572 matches
- Mon Mar 08, 2021 1:12 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II: Medieval
- Topic: Looks like I underestimate generals
- Replies: 2
- Views: 95
Re: Looks like I underestimate generals
Yes, in tournament play you will often see players place generals in the front line to maximise their unit’s impact and melee stats.
- Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:59 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
- Replies: 128
- Views: 2351
Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Div B
SLancaster Scots-Irish 50 BC-476 AD challenges paulmcneil Gothic Horse tribes 260-492 AD with Dacian (Carpi) 107-380 AD allies.
Password is tony. PM sent. Default 1600 pts.
SLancaster Scots-Irish 50 BC-476 AD challenges paulmcneil Gothic Horse tribes 260-492 AD with Dacian (Carpi) 107-380 AD allies.
Password is tony. PM sent. Default 1600 pts.
- Thu Mar 04, 2021 4:58 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory: Empires
- Topic: MP game reliable opponents wanted!!
- Replies: 14
- Views: 363
Re: MP game reliable opponents wanted!!
I only played MP Napoleonic and AGEOD but, unfortunately, am now in a care home. My desktop is in my house awaiting sale :cry: . I only have my old HP laptop which, I think, would be unsatisfactory. My son is waiting to come over from KL to assist in clearing up things. Damn this virus!! All the be...
- Wed Mar 03, 2021 8:57 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II: Medieval
- Topic: Mongol and shooting !
- Replies: 36
- Views: 1427
Re: Mongol and shooting !
Current Mongol player stats in DL:
ericdoman1, Div B: 5 wins and 2 losses.
Ironclad, Div C: 1 win, 2 draws and 1 loss.
SpeedyCM, Div D: 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss.
ericdoman1, Div B: 5 wins and 2 losses.
Ironclad, Div C: 1 win, 2 draws and 1 loss.
SpeedyCM, Div D: 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss.
- Tue Mar 02, 2021 11:33 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
- Replies: 179
- Views: 4018
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division B
SLancaster (Scots) beat MorkinTheFree (Romans) 59-34.
The Scots are really poor at 1600 pts. I didn't think I would get one win but I finally managed it after a hard fight. Good luck to my opponent in his future games!
SLancaster (Scots) beat MorkinTheFree (Romans) 59-34.
The Scots are really poor at 1600 pts. I didn't think I would get one win but I finally managed it after a hard fight. Good luck to my opponent in his future games!
- Tue Mar 02, 2021 1:38 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: High Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
- Replies: 109
- Views: 2117
Re: High Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Div C
SLancaster German (Imperial) 1155-1199 AD challenges GDod Teutonic Order 1226-1319.
Password is tony. PM sent. Default 1200 pts.
SLancaster German (Imperial) 1155-1199 AD challenges GDod Teutonic Order 1226-1319.
Password is tony. PM sent. Default 1200 pts.
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:01 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II: Medieval
- Topic: I think that knights advantage in melee should be removed or lessened
- Replies: 12
- Views: 458
Re: I think that knights advantage in melee should be removed or lessened
One thing that I don't understand is that why giving knights 150 POA in melee vs cavalry. We know that knights only have normal 100 POA in melee vs foot. If they have advantage in melee against lancers, it may come from their quality and armor. Why not just spread this 50 POA advantage to their qua...
- Sat Feb 27, 2021 2:57 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II: Medieval
- Topic: I think that knights advantage in melee should be removed or lessened
- Replies: 12
- Views: 458
Re: I think that knights advantage in melee should be removed or lessened
You make some good points. But, basically you are saying that the 50 POA advantage v a particular kind of cavalry is unfair and not supported by the evidence according to you. But, many players seem to think that Knights are underpowered for their cost. It is the exact opposite from what you are sa...
- Sat Feb 27, 2021 2:56 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II: Medieval
- Topic: I think that knights advantage in melee should be removed or lessened
- Replies: 12
- Views: 458
- Sat Feb 27, 2021 12:41 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II: Medieval
- Topic: I think that knights advantage in melee should be removed or lessened
- Replies: 12
- Views: 458
Re: I think that knights advantage in melee should be removed or lessened
Going just on how they play in the game I think Knights are okay. Quite a few players even seem to think that Knights are overpriced at 74. They are slow, easily flanked, and in my experience often do minimal damage to spearmen apart from their lucky roll on the impact charge from time to time. Tha...
- Sat Feb 27, 2021 10:07 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II: Medieval
- Topic: I think that knights advantage in melee should be removed or lessened
- Replies: 12
- Views: 458
Re: I think that knights advantage in melee should be removed or lessened
Going just on how they play in the game I think Knights are okay. Quite a few players even seem to think that Knights are overpriced at 74. They are slow, easily flanked, and in my experience often do minimal damage to spearmen apart from their lucky roll on the impact charge from time to time.
- Sat Feb 27, 2021 8:06 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II: Medieval
- Topic: Mongol and shooting !
- Replies: 36
- Views: 1427
Re: Mongol and shooting !
Personally, I would go with the Hungarians over the French. I just took a look at both. The Hungarians have 16 horse archers and 8 light horse while the French have 2 mounted Xbows and no light cavalry. The Hungarians have 7 formed archers/Xbows and 5 light archers vs the French 4 XBows and 4 light...
- Fri Feb 26, 2021 7:15 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II: Medieval
- Topic: Mongol and shooting !
- Replies: 36
- Views: 1427
Re: Mongol and shooting !
In league play, some of these armies are simply not designed to fight horse armies. They never faced them historically and are organized to fight similiar armies. Those type matchups are just not going to produce a competitive fun game. I can imagine being the Scots and just sitting there while bei...
- Fri Feb 26, 2021 12:15 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .
- Replies: 118
- Views: 2235
Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .
Division A
SLancaster Egyptian 570-525 BC with Kyrenean Greek 630-461 BC allies defeated MorkinTheFree Lydian 687-551 BC. 55-28.
Tough map and hard to play on. Thanks for the game.
SLancaster Egyptian 570-525 BC with Kyrenean Greek 630-461 BC allies defeated MorkinTheFree Lydian 687-551 BC. 55-28.
Tough map and hard to play on. Thanks for the game.
- Fri Feb 26, 2021 10:54 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: High Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
- Replies: 129
- Views: 3220
Re: High Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division C
SLancaster German (Imperial) 1155-1199 AD defeated ahuyton English 1155-1271 AD with Welsh (South) 1100-1197 AD allies. 56-28.
Everything seemed to go my way in this one. I am happy considering how poorly I am doing with the Scots in LA. Thanks for the game!
SLancaster German (Imperial) 1155-1199 AD defeated ahuyton English 1155-1271 AD with Welsh (South) 1100-1197 AD allies. 56-28.
Everything seemed to go my way in this one. I am happy considering how poorly I am doing with the Scots in LA. Thanks for the game!
- Thu Feb 25, 2021 7:09 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II: Medieval
- Topic: What armies/units are you looking forward to in future DLCs?
- Replies: 37
- Views: 1461
Re: What armies/units are you looking forward to in future DLCs?
Blob mentioned to me that he was looking forward to the White Company!
- Wed Feb 24, 2021 8:54 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II: Medieval
- Topic: Mongol and shooting !
- Replies: 36
- Views: 1427
Re: Mongol and shooting !
I just played a very close game against the Mongols in the DL. I routed three cav units on turn 23 and then another right on turn 24 to win. Ironclad did great with them. Cavalry were darting all over the place pulling me out of position. Their cavalry with bows does a lot of damage. But, overall, I...
- Wed Feb 24, 2021 2:05 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: High Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
- Replies: 129
- Views: 3220
Re: High Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Division C SLancaster German (Imperial) 1155-1199 AD defeated Ironclad Mongols (Europe) 1223-1241 AD. 69-39 . An extremely close game where I only routed 3 cavalry units on turn 24 to suddenly get over 60. The Mongols were very tough and expertly played by Ironclad. I expect other armies to be hara...
- Tue Feb 23, 2021 6:01 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II: Medieval
- Topic: What armies/units are you looking forward to in future DLCs?
- Replies: 37
- Views: 1461
Re: What armies/units are you looking forward to in future DLCs?
I will meet the upstart Richard Yorke III at Bosworth Field. We will stream it on YouTube to conclude the War of the Roses. That period will be my favourite I think and hopefully well represented! Isn't the War of the Roses a great arena for completely symmetrical battles? Well, if you mean that co...
- Tue Feb 23, 2021 1:11 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II: Medieval
- Topic: What armies/units are you looking forward to in future DLCs?
- Replies: 37
- Views: 1461
Re: What armies/units are you looking forward to in future DLCs?
I will meet the upstart Richard Yorke III at Bosworth Field. We will stream it on YouTube to conclude the War of the Roses. That period will be my favourite I think and hopefully well represented!