I agree that F/G stats should be adjusted somewhat. If we do it exactly as suggested I can't say atm.

Also PzC stats don't translate exactly to OOB since there are key diffs in some areas. They might serve as orientation, but we don't aim to exactly replicate them.

I can ask the tech guys if this could be made optional, but I can't really say if it's on the table.

It's a gameplay decision to show supply state and efficiency for all, just like suppression in PzC.

Not showing it would make coordinated attacks a bit of a blind flight.

terminator wrote: ↑

Tue Sep 17, 2019 5:19 am

I thought the use of neutral mines was a general rule. I always use neutral mines in my scenarios.

More like the general rule of the thumb...

It has become the quasi-standard over time, but it's not like it *has* to be like that to 100%

BTW, any chance you'll do more of the aces with unique bonus abilities? I loved the flexible movement Japanese ace and the British AOE bonus air ace (intended that he is AOE?). I'd also enjoy some more aoe ground commanders with unique abilities limited to particular unit types. A cavalry commander...

Thx for the headsup.

Re Wuhan - IIRC the supply is intended to indicate logistic probs. However, -1 has not really much of an impact.

Re mines IIRC in Morning Sun we used non-neutral mines a couple times, back then there was some back and forth about the best way to set them up.

Thx for the hint, gets changed.

Are you aware that there are 2 different "move to" orders selectable in trigger effects, one with ignore ON, the other with ignore OFF? Maybe you selected the latter, so had the unit still *not ignoring enemies? Other than that it could be a problem with team definitions. Overall for now I think it'...

Hi,

sorry for the hassle, please read here:

https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewto ... 64&t=93534

Regarding the fighter/AA comments, AA are a good addition indeed, but I can also see objectives coming in future content that require ***fighters to be achieved....just sayin'

Thx for reporting (OP), and for the suggestion (Bru).

It looks like a good solution.

Should be dealt with by availability dates- need to check tho.

edit. or better by price, as availability is similar

Double, so one locked.

Erik2 wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 04, 2019 12:44 pm

I may have asked about this earlier.
Anyway, it is still bugging me

Why can't the German half-track attack an enemy unit in a truck?
It can fire at infantry on foot. Shouldn't make a difference.
Is this intended?

htrack.jpg

Winter is coming. Err, I mean a change regarding this

Good pt IMO, I'd reduce 410 small air attack as it's not a dogfighter.

I can reproduce the problem by starting up the first scenario of the Sandstorm campaign, buying two SM.79 bombers to bring down the Italian RP to 160, and then upgrading the Italian 75/18 gun to a 149/19 gun with mandatory Breda 61 truck (the cost for the truck is displayed in red because I can aff...

This isn't abuse, it is literally the problem tankodesantniki were created to solve: a lack of spare industrial capacity for halftracks and the need for tank infantry coordination to fight a combined arms battle. An easy way to ensure players don't go overboard with it is to lower defensive stats w...

I'm afraid I have to curb the enthusiasm a bit here. The thing is that we are already having many inf units, and I doubt adding many more is the way to go. We have inf and guards inf, not to mention heavy, eng, para, marines - all with new models coming in per year, which already represents various ...

I think this is a primary case for modding. Because whatever route the devs take you'll always have ppl who prefer it otherwise. So that is exactly where modding comes in, because it gives ppl the option to change things to what ***they prefer. There is no further change on this trait planned, what ...