Search found 79 matches
- Sun Dec 31, 2023 10:33 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II
- Topic: hot seat battles
- Replies: 1
- Views: 186
hot seat battles
If you set up a hot seat single player battle, the AI often, without your knowledge, sends off troops on a flank march in a open battle. Can you select to disable this AI option in an open battle? Often 1 side is down 100 plus points for no advantage, especially when the flank march never turns up.
- Sun Dec 31, 2023 10:27 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II
- Topic: multiplayer screen question
- Replies: 1
- Views: 196
multiplayer screen question
On the multiplayer screen "Accept Challenge" what's the difference between white and red padlocks.
If a challenge is called a "Ranked Challenge" what does this mean?
TIA
If a challenge is called a "Ranked Challenge" what does this mean?
TIA
- Wed Dec 15, 2021 9:57 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: Farewell!!
- Replies: 77
- Views: 6065
Re: Farewell!!
Your watch is done.
appreciate all the hard work and effort over the years.
appreciate all the hard work and effort over the years.
- Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:03 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1723901
Re: End of Season report . . .
Pete and the team,
Thank you for all the hard work in putting on the well organised and fun season 10.
Thank you for all the hard work in putting on the well organised and fun season 10.
- Sun Apr 11, 2021 5:29 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1723901
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division B
garymann - Roman 199-106 BC with Numidian 341-56 BC allies (1600) beat Trogilus - Thracian (Triballi) 350 BC-46 AD (1600) score 62:40
Thracians fought for every inch.
Thanks for the game
See you soon.
gary
garymann - Roman 199-106 BC with Numidian 341-56 BC allies (1600) beat Trogilus - Thracian (Triballi) 350 BC-46 AD (1600) score 62:40
Thracians fought for every inch.
Thanks for the game
See you soon.
gary
- Sun Apr 11, 2021 8:50 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1723901
Re: tyronec has won Classical Antiquity Division B!
Congratulations tyronec, well played over the 9 matches. glad is wasn't just me who got roughed up by the Syracusans!
- Mon Mar 29, 2021 8:25 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II
- Topic: Mercenary Hoplites
- Replies: 22
- Views: 3963
Re: Mercenary Hoplites
I suppose another alternative would be to go the other way and keep mercenary hoplites as are and downgrade citizen hoplites to below average (ie not raw. so less of a POA drop) and unmanouverable.
- Wed Mar 10, 2021 1:43 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1723901
Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
DIV B
garymann - Roman 199-106 BC with Numidian 341-56 BC allies (1600)
Challenges
batesmotel – Roman 219-200 BC with Greek 227-146 BC allies (1600)
Trogilus - Thracian (Triballi) 350 BC-46 AD (1600)
pw roma
Pm sent
garymann - Roman 199-106 BC with Numidian 341-56 BC allies (1600)
Challenges
batesmotel – Roman 219-200 BC with Greek 227-146 BC allies (1600)
Trogilus - Thracian (Triballi) 350 BC-46 AD (1600)
pw roma
Pm sent
- Tue Mar 09, 2021 5:18 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1723901
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division B
garymann - Roman 199-106 BC with Numidian 341-56 BC allies drew with - desertedfox - Gallic 300-101 BC with Samnite 355-272 allies 0:0
(0-0)
garymann - Roman 199-106 BC with Numidian 341-56 BC allies drew with - desertedfox - Gallic 300-101 BC with Samnite 355-272 allies 0:0
(0-0)
- Mon Mar 01, 2021 6:59 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1723901
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division B
garymann - Roman 199-106 BC with Numidian 341-56 BC allies defeats DzonVejn - Skythian 300BC-50 AD 41:11
garymann - Roman 199-106 BC with Numidian 341-56 BC allies defeats DzonVejn - Skythian 300BC-50 AD 41:11
- Fri Feb 26, 2021 5:49 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1723901
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division B
garymann - Roman 199-106 BC with Numidian 341-56 BC allies has defeated Swuul - Samnite 355-272 BC with Gallic allies 47% to 21%
Meat grinder as expected. Great player, thanks for the game.
garymann - Roman 199-106 BC with Numidian 341-56 BC allies has defeated Swuul - Samnite 355-272 BC with Gallic allies 47% to 21%
Meat grinder as expected. Great player, thanks for the game.
- Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:32 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1723901
Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
DIV B
garymann - Roman 199-106 BC with Numidian 341-56 BC allies (1600)
Challenges
IMC - Carthaginian (Hannibal in Africa) 202 BC (1600)
tyronec - Syracusan 412-281 BC with Kyrenean Greek 321-276 BC allies (1600)
pw roma
PM sent
GL
garymann - Roman 199-106 BC with Numidian 341-56 BC allies (1600)
Challenges
IMC - Carthaginian (Hannibal in Africa) 202 BC (1600)
tyronec - Syracusan 412-281 BC with Kyrenean Greek 321-276 BC allies (1600)
pw roma
PM sent
GL
- Mon Feb 01, 2021 6:55 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1723901
Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
DIV B
garymann - Roman 199-106 BC with Numidian 341-56 BC allies (1600)
Challenges
Aetius39 - Pyrrhic 280-275 BC with Samnite 355-272 BC allies (1600)
Stew101 - Numidian/Moorish 55 BC-6 AD (1600)
Swuul - Samnite 355-272 BC with Gallic allies (1600)
pw roma
PM sent
GL
garymann - Roman 199-106 BC with Numidian 341-56 BC allies (1600)
Challenges
Aetius39 - Pyrrhic 280-275 BC with Samnite 355-272 BC allies (1600)
Stew101 - Numidian/Moorish 55 BC-6 AD (1600)
Swuul - Samnite 355-272 BC with Gallic allies (1600)
pw roma
PM sent
GL
- Fri Jan 29, 2021 6:14 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II: Tech Support
- Topic: flank march custom matches
- Replies: 2
- Views: 501
Re: flank march custom matches
Thanks Richard,
I thought I was missing a button I could press somewhere.
What you say makes sense. More of a minor inconvenience than anything else. The hot seat change was spot on , so can't complain. I just ended up starting a new game. As you said, this time no flank march. Not a priority.
I thought I was missing a button I could press somewhere.
What you say makes sense. More of a minor inconvenience than anything else. The hot seat change was spot on , so can't complain. I just ended up starting a new game. As you said, this time no flank march. Not a priority.
- Thu Jan 28, 2021 4:23 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II: Tech Support
- Topic: flank march custom matches
- Replies: 2
- Views: 501
flank march custom matches
I'm playing the AI with Hotseat on. The game keeps telling me I've sent 9 units on flank march on an open battle. How do I disable this or stop it happening in the first place? I do not want or asked for a flank march.
- Sat Jan 23, 2021 6:18 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II
- Topic: Musings on the five elements of FOGII
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1552
Re: Musings on the five elements of FOGII
sorry off topic , but "Queens Gambit" is a great series, so engrossing. Understand this posting completely. nyczar with you 100%!
- Sat Jan 23, 2021 6:12 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II
- Topic: Camels
- Replies: 2
- Views: 635
Camels
Should camels not treat rough going as an non open hex. I thought camels would be more sure footed in this type of terrain (brush/soft going)? Not a massive nerf for camels, but bring a bit of difference in troop types? I know this has no relevance, but in some of Richard's previous rule sets Camels...
- Sat Jan 23, 2021 6:00 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II
- Topic: Heavy Artillery
- Replies: 3
- Views: 766
Heavy Artillery
Could heavy artillery not move, say 1 hex a turn, and then be unable to fire for 2 or other amount turns, when settled to model dismantling and then constructing again. I would have thought some stuff could be pushed?
- Mon Jan 18, 2021 12:42 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1723901
Re: Classical Antiquity recruitment is now open . . .
I'm in,
1600 pts preference.
Army choices:
1. Roman 199-106 BC with Numidian allies 341-56 BC.
2. Pergamene 190 - 106 BC.
3. Ptolemaic 166 -56 BC.
4. Samnite 355-272BC with Gallic allies 300BC- 101BC.
Thanks Pete
Armies checked, OK 19/1
1600 pts preference.
Army choices:
1. Roman 199-106 BC with Numidian allies 341-56 BC.
2. Pergamene 190 - 106 BC.
3. Ptolemaic 166 -56 BC.
4. Samnite 355-272BC with Gallic allies 300BC- 101BC.
Thanks Pete
Armies checked, OK 19/1
- Mon Jan 18, 2021 8:04 am
- Forum: Field of Glory II: Tech Support
- Topic: game failed to send message
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1033
Re: game failed to send message
thanks Richard