Cheers Snuggle,

Will do and sure, I may pop one up when I get bored of single player but as I'm new its all still a learning experience.

Hey all, if you need someone to jump in, give me a shout and I might be able to assist, although, please note I'm new to the game and play for fun so I will likely be the weakest player for a team and not too bothered about winning.

Hey all,

I'm new to the game, bought it in this years steam summer sale but I'd be up for giving it a go, I'm not a competitive individual and prefer to play fun/historical style games and with my lack of game knowledge I'd make a perfect naive general

I've watched a few of his Pike and Shot games and they are a good watch, a thumbs up from me.

Kimbell,

I dont think this game has started, once the DLC drops I'm sure a nrw game will get started as folk want to try out the new factions.

In-game private messaging! Followed by in-game private messaging. And then, allowing replacement players to step in to a quitting players spot. Or even take over an AI position, for that matter. As to arbiter, would be ok as an option I guess. Such an arbiter could handle player replacement issues ...

Yeah, I think a way to get rid of mega armies would be a good idea, the armies feel far too big for the time period.

In games it is also easy to min max the numbers and over emphasis the mechanical tactical ability of commanders. In my humble opinion it is common that wars are fought and lost on things such as logistics. Also, generals only had so much control over an army, once the battle had started it was often...

Are we?

Considering the game lasts hundreds of years and you have far more control over matters in the nation that most leaders could, especially wars, I see myself as a cabal of interested parties leading the nation from the sidelines.

I bet

Maybe it could cancel out an element of unrest and the risk of revolt without adding to loyalty? That might make it less of a power jump.

I agree, I never build it, the payoff never seems worth it.

Some interesting ideas on how to make it more worth while.

Majick,

I found that to be a great way to play, pick a general, fight out all of their battles and auto the rest.

When they die pick another general or call it a game and try another play through.

Recently I have been exporting a lot of battles and I have experienced some of these issues. I think it will be quite difficult to sort out some of the battle issues where it converts. I played Celticc (Northern Italy Galic tribes) and it was all going well until my 1-1 general met a roman 2-0 gener...

I may not have been as clear as I think I was in my previous postings but this should not be certain and with some significant risk, so removed at will is not exactly what I am looking for either.

Cheers for the answer Pocus :lol: Get decadence on max and have them die via some drug fueled orgy, worse ways to go Sure, this isn't a make or break thing, just a nice bit of flavour/story and maybe a decision to make here and there. It is something I'd like to see, as would bringing back friendly ...

Sure, why not provide a list of leaders to take over, maybe the more democratic the nation, the more options? No, you could try it on all leaders. Its just that a leader with a lot of negative traits would be easier to take out, those who are mixed or mostly positive would be hard. I'm also advocati...

On that note, you could modify the chance of success by personal traits

Hey Pocus, Dev team, I've noticed in a couple of my play throughs that I occasionally ended up with an absolute monster as a leader and it would be quite fun to try ad get rid of this person. If we could have a couple of options to get rid this would be great. For example - 1-Foment a coup - Dependi...

I'll be up for giving the new DLC a go

I've managed to drop to only one multiplayer game but as others have said I'm waiting for the next patch and possibly the DLC.

I'll keep an eye out closer to your start date and jump in if I'm available.