I, for one, like the Sütterlin font for the placenames. But doing all maps would be an immense task, I would imagine.

The easier it is for cavalry to break off and leave combat the more frustrating it is for infantry based armies. Which would be historically correct! Infantry can't force a fight against unwilling cavalry, in most game modes cavalry has no real reason to offer battle for infantry, and it's already ...

Could some examples be provided for the cases like cavalry can't break-off because of ZOC or cavalry can break-off ignoring ZOC? I think that may help the discussion. example.png These horse archers are secondarily pinned by the diagonally facing lancers. In the current game they are doomed, unless...

I'm certainly in favor of horse being able to break off from foot regardless of the ZOC. I think that would be more in the flavor of how mounted functioned vs foot, even into periods beyond. I'd be in favor of mounted being able to break off vs slower horse as well, so lights could break off from n...

That would be nice. Cavalry is too easily pinned, nthey should be able to disengage when in zoc only from the front. No version of fog ( computer or tabletop) allowed voluntary break offs ( maybe p&s tabletop did?). I agree that Cavalry is too easily pinned by mere infantry and would love to see it...

phcas wrote: ↑

Tue Oct 08, 2019 7:01 pm

Latro wrote: ↑

Tue Oct 08, 2019 6:33 pm

Nice pic but the colours are wrong.
Trousers should be Feldgrau and the helmet 'apple green'

Oke, I can not change that

There you go..

Any way.
Here are two French tanks in camo.

Nice pic but the colours are wrong.
Trousers should be Feldgrau and the helmet 'apple green'

Yes this is a problem we maybe can solve. The recon aircraft are recon units that can fly. Thats why they can take the flags of cities that are not occupied by the enemy. Maybe we can solve that to make them tactical bombers with recon movement (like the night fighters), or we must accept that they...

In the Big Poland scenario the zeppelin is able to conquer enemy flags.

Strategiusz wrote: ↑

Sun Oct 06, 2019 11:18 am

It is annoying to pick up units from the back edge of the map to put closer to the front.

Indeed. To overcome this somewhat I use auto deploy and then rearange the troops.

Maybe, newly selected troops could be dropped on a different row than the rear one? Closer to the front.

No, you seem to be correct.
I was indeed looking through the units in the big Poland scenario and did not see the Flak as Luftwaffe.
Thought it might have been a mistake.

Another nitpick but I noticed that all the Flak units are wehrmacht or ss.
Except for the ss ones, shouldn't they be Luftwaffe?

Something like this..

BTW.
Found the guy in the pic.

Kanthe wrote: ↑

Sat Oct 05, 2019 11:39 am

It's General Major Bäke.


Bäke single-handedly destroyed three Soviet tanks during the battle of Balabonovka pocket with infantry weapons at close range, for which he received three Tank Destruction Badges.

I like the new Herr General.

He could do with a nice car...

Corrected pennant for Oberbefehlshaber einer Heeresgruppe

Of course it is possible to earn both.
That tanker destroyed 3 tanks but by hand. They remain seperate awards earned for seperate occasions.

Kanthe wrote: ↑

Sat Oct 05, 2019 7:57 am

Yes,thats rigth, but the "Panzerkampfabzeichen in Bronze" was not worn by the Tank crews. So ist could bei that both was worn together.

https://www.tracesofwar.com/awards/1465 ... e-Zahl.htm

Nope.
The full title is ‘Sonderabzeichen für niederkampfen Panzerkampfwagen durch Einzelkämpfer‘

https://www.tracesofwar.com/awards/1471 ... Silber.htm

The gold version is to denote 5 tanks destroyed.

As I have pointed out before, this award is wrong. 738E05CF-0DEE-45E3-9D2B-0C2D0A228C52.gif It combines two seperate historical awards that were not worn together. One is for Panzer crews and the other is for infantry that has destroyed a tank by hand (as with a magnetic mine or a Panzerfaust). So, ...

Any use for a French transport plane?