I have a cavalry unit that has been surrounded and I cannot get it to do anything. I would have thought it could have at least been able to attack the unit directly in front of it. Is this what is supposed to happen or is this just an unusual situation that has not been anticipated?
Thank you,
Colin

I am just a lowly player in Division C and my taking part is to play against different players. I choose different armies for the experience as it does not seem to matter what I choose, I am either a very bad general or my luck is low. It makes me sometimes wonder why I play, but the opponents are g...

Div C

gamercb - Romano-British 407-599 AD beat paulmcneil - Ancient British 60 BC-80 AD 61-32

Thanks for the game. Nice not to face armoured foes or clouds of skirmishers who can run away.

Bluefin wrote: ↑

Mon Jun 17, 2019 10:07 pm

Division C

Bluefin (Frank) defeats gamercb (Romano-British) 48-16.

In the end, a flurry of rallies decided the outcome.

I think this has been missed off the results table. It does not show up in the Arrange your matches thread.

Colin

Table corrected. (stockwellpete)

Div C

gamercb - Romano-British 407-599 AD beat Doyley50 - Roman 24 BC-196 AD 74-39

The Romano-British managed to gain the high ground and the cavalry found a way pass the blocking Roman forces to cause havoc from the rear. Thanks for the game.
Colin

Do you have you have to select the allies when setting up the battle?

Div C

gamercb - Romano-British 407-599 AD challenges paulmcneil - Ancient British 60 BC-80 AD pw takeover. pm sent

Div C

gamercb - Romano-British 407-599 AD challenges Doyley50 - Roman 24 BC-196 AD pw leavers. pm sent

Division C

gamercb - Romano-British 407-599 AD beat Barrold713 - Moorish 55 BC-6 AD 60-57

I won by the skin of my teeth. Thanks for a good close game.

(3-1)

Are these combat result predictions right? I have a unit fighting two other units, one of which is disordered whilst the other is uphill. The percentage modification for fighting multiple enemies in one combat is +1% and for the other +6%. The uphill Noble cavalry has a (8) after it whilst the other...

Division C

gamercb - Romano-British 407-599 AD challenges Bluefin - Frank 496-599 AD. pw is Bluefin. PM sent.

Division C

gamercb - Romano-British 407-599 AD challenges GDod - Galatian 280 BC-63 AD. pw is GDod. PM sent

Division C

gamercb - Romano-British 407-599 AD challenges sunnyboy - Ostrogoth 493-561 AD. pw is sunnyboy. PM sent.

Division C

gamercb - Romano-British 407-599 AD challenges Trogilus - Dacian 50 BC-88 AD. pw Trogilus. PM sent

I have not purchased WATG yet and was just bring up the game to accept first league game. I have version 1.5.3 It tells me there is a new update. I select OK and begin the process of getting the new update (download new updater, restart, download update, start update) and it then tells me that I alr...

Hello Pete,

Could I be put down as a reserve for Early Middle Ages and Classical Antiquities please?
Colin

Hello,

If still available I would like to take the last place.

My army choices are:

1 Romano-British 407-599 AD
2 Vandal 442-499 AD
3 Spanish (Sertorius) 80-70 BC
4 Hunnic (Western) 455-559 AD

Thank you,
Colin

So what you are saying is that if they would have turned 45 degrees to continue the pursuit, they can turn another 45 degrees to charge a new unit. That seems wrong and definitely looks wrong when you suddenly find yourself being flanked by a unit that was in pursuit. I would have thought that units...

I would love to see what numbers the RNG is coming up with as I do not think it is as random as many people think. An RNG is code and requires a base value and the base value may not be random. If you go back to page 4 of this thread you will see the results of the extended test that I did showing ...

I would love to see what numbers the RNG is coming up with as I do not think it is as random as many people think. An RNG is code and requires a base value and the base value may not be random.