I’m in again!

The list in FOG 1 did allow for poor, average and superior Cataphracts in the Dominate lists (284-379) The poor ones were utterly useless! Competitively I wouldn't take them, but they were fun for themed games. I don't know if the performance of the late Roman heavy horse can be summed up really wi...

The list in FOG 1 did allow for poor, average and superior Cataphracts in the Dominate lists (284-379) The poor ones were utterly useless!

MikeC_81 wrote: ↑

Sun Jul 05, 2020 8:38 pm

I am talking about folks who set up powerful armies like Pikes on their end and supply their opponent jank like an Irr. Foot army.

Ahh, the old medium foot trick haha!

If that is a thing, it would only affect side B, who gets to deploy and move in their first turn. Sounds like that might be the explanation. This assignment of general issue has now happened twice after deployment in different games. In this game I wanted to assign my general to the disrupted horse...

I just don’t see the value of telling new players that if the see a mp battle with the opponents army subjectively perceived to be better, its a “trap”. You chose to accept or create skirmish battles, it’s hardly a trap. If your at mike_c’s or snuggles level, sure it probably makes more of a differe...

So what’s a specific example of a “trap games”?? Trap games are when strong armies like the Romans face off against warbands. There are trap scenarios, too. Try to win at Bibracte with the Gauls.. sometimes you may want the challenge! What?? That’s usually a good fight. I meant what specific lists ...

So what’s a specific example of a “trap games”??

Swiss Tourney Rnd #1 Wmpryor (Arab Conquest 638AD) challenges Graymouser (Arab Conquest 638AD) Password: wmpryor (no caps) PM sent Will pick up soon, had a tree fall across all my important wires in my driveway. Electic Co. came with out calling an hour later, fixed... Cable Co... called for 4 hour...

I’ll take Assyrians.

Sign me up! Could go either way for open or theme, although I find Viking/shieldwall armies kinda boring.

Arguably very few ancient or medieval battles allowed a mauled army to slink away, they broke and that was it. That is a fair point. Actually, how many battles were settled due to night falling and the engagement being broken off? I do seem to recall a few battles that went on and on for multiple d...

Is this really a major problem? I've yet to encounter a player who could keep away from me for 24 turns straight. A couple of close shaves that forced me to fight at a disadvantage, usually due to corner camping or fortifying mountainous or heavily forested terrain but nothing insurmountable, or ev...

Increasing the turn length only aids players whom, if given nicknames based on play style, would be dubbed “the Great Delayer” , “The Forester”, “Cocke on The Hill, “The Edger”, “Swing Wide and Deep, Forever” and “Flatearther”

Hello, anyone hear from Baldrick? Our game has been up since the 9th, no response to PM's..

HI guys, sorry for any delays on my end, been dealing with plagues, riots and graduation week so have been basically offline. Ill get my challenge up soonest for round three ( and fifnishing up my round two battle as well w kiwiwarlord )but its unclear to me if I'm fighting Baldrick or gentlmenranke...

Hey Pete, schweetness did not seek to be offended by my post, why are you? Truly, why would you want someone testing your mod to keep coming on here and posting the reasons they don’t like a feature or it won’t work , over and over? You just confirmed, yet again, you will rigorously defend your cha...

So I have played some more and was going to log my findings but after reading the posts since my last check in, I'm not sure why I should. Suit yourself. :roll: With all due respect, your ( Stockwelle and scwhweetness) posts in here not only suggest, but outright state that the 'add ons' are your o...

So I have played some more and was going to log my findings but after reading the posts since my last check in, I'm not sure why I should. With all due respect, your ( Stockwelle and scwhweetness) posts in here not only suggest, but outright state that the 'add ons' are your own two's particular wan...

So after some games vs the AI noticed a few things/ a few comments: Almost no units ever rallied from routed status ( average 1 per battle on BOTH sides...) Is this desired? Can the failure to pass anarchy/refuse be shown on the combat log? Its hard to tell if its working as intended. The new "quick...