
Search found 140 matches
- Sat Nov 24, 2007 7:12 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Helsinki
- Replies: 48
- Views: 5550
- Sun Nov 18, 2007 9:53 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Warfare
- Replies: 34
- Views: 4906
Had a great time again,but feel these rules need to be played in period,my NKE came unstuck against Knights! After doing pretty well on Saturday and going in 2nd to start on Sunday i got a good lesson from Richards Lithuanians and Lance"s hard as nails Serbians. :( But not complaining all my games w...
- Sat Nov 10, 2007 9:26 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: WARFARE NOTICE
- Replies: 36
- Views: 4655
- Sat Nov 03, 2007 12:01 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: List query
- Replies: 1
- Views: 371
- Mon Oct 15, 2007 7:45 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Godendag Theme(s)
- Replies: 15
- Views: 2521
- Sun Oct 14, 2007 7:25 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Results from Manchester
- Replies: 16
- Views: 2091
- Sun Oct 14, 2007 7:10 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Results from Manchester
- Replies: 16
- Views: 2091
- Fri Oct 12, 2007 3:11 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Runners and Riders for Manchester
- Replies: 3
- Views: 708
- Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:30 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Runners and Riders for Manchester
- Replies: 3
- Views: 708
- Wed Oct 10, 2007 8:31 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: lists for warfare
- Replies: 1
- Views: 336
- Mon Oct 08, 2007 5:54 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: The C-in-Cs Inch
- Replies: 3
- Views: 574
Hi Albion I disagree that the C-in-C should have more authority in the game. Remember that you are acting out as the C-in-C so you have to get your deployment and battle plan right. Also there is some instances that the C-in-C is not as good as a commander as his subordinates, think the rules work w...
- Wed Sep 26, 2007 4:27 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Mixed Battle Groups- Clarification on rear contact
- Replies: 23
- Views: 2840
- Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:49 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Mixed Battle Groups- Clarification on rear contact
- Replies: 23
- Views: 2840
I know what you are saying Roger and its got me, it does say on page 35 under conforming to enemy in close combat: A battle group that has some bases facing at 90 or 180 degrees to the rest (due to enemy contacting its former flank or rear) does not conform to enemy. So that now surgesting that from...
- Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:15 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Mixed Battle Groups- Clarification on rear contact
- Replies: 23
- Views: 2840
Hi Spike on page 27 6th bullit it says, Bases contacted on a side or rear edge, or a rear corner, by an enemy flank or rear charge are immediately turned 90 or 180 degrees to face the chargers ,using the normal rules for turning, provided that they are not already in contact with enemy to their fron...
- Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:14 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Mixed Battle Groups- Clarification on rear contact
- Replies: 23
- Views: 2840
Hi Spike on page 27 6th bullit it says, Bases contacted on a side or rear edge, or a rear corner, by an enemy flank or rear charge are immediately turned 90 or 180 degrees to face the chargers ,using the normal rules for turning, provided that they are not already in contact with enemy to their fron...
- Mon Jul 02, 2007 8:57 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Roll Call Results
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3388
Hi what a fantastic weekend not just because i won and Incidentally i lost 2 of my games,but what a free flowing set of wargame rules what are easy to read and understand, theres no sneaky horrible moves (ie kinking) but free flowing mechanism. I know theres still a lot of people out there what are ...
- Mon Jul 02, 2007 8:14 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: BRITCON ENTRIES
- Replies: 17
- Views: 6069
- Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:33 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Picking a army
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3180
Re: Picking a army
Hi chaps just sent my army list in for Leeds next weekend,and i found it difficult to get 800pts exactly. It dont help when you have to have even no"s of BG i can understand why you want to have even BG but is there scope to allow say up to 1 skirm BG to be uneven. I understand your pain, but if yo...
- Sat Feb 24, 2007 10:45 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Picking a army
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3180
Picking a army
Hi chaps just sent my army list in for Leeds next weekend,and i found it difficult to get 800pts exactly.
It dont help when you have to have even no"s of BG i can understand why you want to have even BG but is there scope to allow say up to 1 skirm BG to be uneven.
It dont help when you have to have even no"s of BG i can understand why you want to have even BG but is there scope to allow say up to 1 skirm BG to be uneven.
- Wed Feb 14, 2007 8:45 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: A O W Beginner
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1478
A O W Beginner
Only got my version of AOW last weekend and i cannot put them down i have not been this excited about a promising set of wargame rules since (The sound of the guns was publised) cannot wait to start pushing some toys about with my mate Bob.Will let you know how my first games were soon.
ANDY.
ANDY.
