Trouble in Batan defense
Moderators: Order of Battle Moderators, The Artistocrats
-
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2018 12:26 pm
Trouble in Batan defense
So, I think I hit my first roadblock with this game.
The scenario looks impossible, although it is probably partly caused by me being nuts and starting at maximum difficulty.
Previous scenarios were manageable and I was reluctant to lower difficultly.
Fact is is, enemy numbers are overwhelming.
I set up my defenses alongside the rivers, had all infantry covered by AT guns and had some ground AA for protection.
I always tried to maximize terrain bonuses and abuse rivers. I also had a decent resource amount since I completed all the secondaries in thew previous scenarios.
Yet enemy continuously pummel my infantry, and even while being in rivers eventually they manage to break their morale and rout them by sheer attrition.
Enemy air rule the sky and while my AA slowly bleeds them, they inflict casualties. Later, a strat bomber shows up and makes thing even worse.
Now, I managed to hold the left side. The enemy marine assault came, but I managed to contain it.
Right is a lost cause. I managed to hold the gold objective secondary and got a few of requisition, but it costed me way too many losses.
My line collapsed when I finished the resources, even when minimizing losses, each Japanese units manages to knock 1-2 men even if fighting from rivers and eventually my squads get broken.
I was wondering, besides lowering the difficulty, how can good players manage to win this in hardest mode?
Maybe I need a full core of Heavy infantry covered by entrenching engineers?
The scenario looks impossible, although it is probably partly caused by me being nuts and starting at maximum difficulty.
Previous scenarios were manageable and I was reluctant to lower difficultly.
Fact is is, enemy numbers are overwhelming.
I set up my defenses alongside the rivers, had all infantry covered by AT guns and had some ground AA for protection.
I always tried to maximize terrain bonuses and abuse rivers. I also had a decent resource amount since I completed all the secondaries in thew previous scenarios.
Yet enemy continuously pummel my infantry, and even while being in rivers eventually they manage to break their morale and rout them by sheer attrition.
Enemy air rule the sky and while my AA slowly bleeds them, they inflict casualties. Later, a strat bomber shows up and makes thing even worse.
Now, I managed to hold the left side. The enemy marine assault came, but I managed to contain it.
Right is a lost cause. I managed to hold the gold objective secondary and got a few of requisition, but it costed me way too many losses.
My line collapsed when I finished the resources, even when minimizing losses, each Japanese units manages to knock 1-2 men even if fighting from rivers and eventually my squads get broken.
I was wondering, besides lowering the difficulty, how can good players manage to win this in hardest mode?
Maybe I need a full core of Heavy infantry covered by entrenching engineers?
-
- Lieutenant-General - Karl-Gerat 040
- Posts: 3700
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:24 pm
Re: Trouble in Batan defense
At least on the "right side", you should use engineers to lay some minefields and definitely blow all bridges. And try to hold on to the fortress as long as possible. Their arty guns are amazing!
-
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2018 12:26 pm
Re: Trouble in Batan defense
I think I am also going to lower the difficulty to default setting (fighting on equal terms), enemy units being buffed looks really bad and I am afraid it might make the game feel less realistic.
But I also fear that this would trivialize the game, hope this is not the case.
But I also fear that this would trivialize the game, hope this is not the case.
-
- Captain - Heavy Cruiser
- Posts: 944
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 4:52 pm
Re: Trouble in Batan defense
Hello Epperaliant.
You have be patient.
1. You have defense some places for few turn and try slow retreat.
do not defend the riverside places at all costs !!! and slowly retreat..
remember about AT gun behind for the defense infantry.
2. two or 3 units are optimal to the good defence on the river.
You have be patient.
1. You have defense some places for few turn and try slow retreat.
do not defend the riverside places at all costs !!! and slowly retreat..
remember about AT gun behind for the defense infantry.
2. two or 3 units are optimal to the good defence on the river.
-
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2018 12:26 pm
Re: Trouble in Batan defense
I am replaying at Normal difficulty.
The Ai is much more cautions now as it cannot simply just steamroll my units.
It feels much fair now, I hope this was the difficulty the whole campaigns were planned around.
Hardest mode really feels you need to know the maps by heart and it's 100% unforgiving.
The Ai is much more cautions now as it cannot simply just steamroll my units.
It feels much fair now, I hope this was the difficulty the whole campaigns were planned around.
Hardest mode really feels you need to know the maps by heart and it's 100% unforgiving.
-
- Lieutenant-General - Karl-Gerat 040
- Posts: 3700
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:24 pm
Re: Trouble in Batan defense
Not really. But it helps if you know the OoB rules and mechanics. And (of course) it helps if you've played the scen at least once BEFORE you choose to play it on the highest difficulty level.Epperaliant wrote: ↑Thu Mar 25, 2021 4:11 pm Hardest mode really feels you need to know the maps by heart and it's 100% unforgiving.
But thank you, reading this post I've really got some appetite to replay the scen; and partly to know if I still know what I'm doing playing stock scens with the vanilla OoB version.
Here's my most recent playthrough. It's no AAR, just a few screenshots:
-
- Lieutenant-General - Karl-Gerat 040
- Posts: 3700
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:24 pm
Re: Trouble in Batan defense
continued:
-
- Lieutenant-General - Karl-Gerat 040
- Posts: 3700
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:24 pm
Re: Trouble in Batan defense
And as always, I elite repaired ALL my core forces (except recon).
-
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2018 12:26 pm
Re: Trouble in Batan defense
Congratulations.
Now I really want to try again and feel guilty of playing Normal, lol.
Now I really want to try again and feel guilty of playing Normal, lol.
-
- Lieutenant-General - Karl-Gerat 040
- Posts: 3700
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:24 pm
Re: Trouble in Batan defense
Don't. I know how I suffered playing this scen the first time many many many years ago...
-
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2018 12:26 pm
Re: Trouble in Batan defense
I think I made a significant mistake that could have jeopardized the mission:
In the previous one, I bought an Artillery piece from my tutorial core. Too late I realized it was pretty much useless in defense. I could sell it and replay the mission with more requisition.
Also, I was wondering, while in defense, did you attack enemies when the opportunity arised?
I could inflict heavy losses, but I also reduced the entrenchment, maybe that was a mistake.
Also, I remember bunkers being the weak link in my defense, eventually Japanese infantry smashed them opening holes in my line.
In the previous one, I bought an Artillery piece from my tutorial core. Too late I realized it was pretty much useless in defense. I could sell it and replay the mission with more requisition.
Also, I was wondering, while in defense, did you attack enemies when the opportunity arised?
I could inflict heavy losses, but I also reduced the entrenchment, maybe that was a mistake.
Also, I remember bunkers being the weak link in my defense, eventually Japanese infantry smashed them opening holes in my line.
-
- Lieutenant-General - Karl-Gerat 040
- Posts: 3700
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:24 pm
Re: Trouble in Batan defense
Not necessarily a mistake. If I would have remembered that I will get three more CP some turns into the mission, I wouldn't have deployed the useless commandos and bought an arty piece instead. Would've been quite useful on my right/eastern flank, I think.Epperaliant wrote: ↑Sat Mar 27, 2021 4:02 pm I think I made a significant mistake that could have jeopardized the mission:
In the previous one, I bought an Artillery piece from my tutorial core.
As long as you've got AA cover, you can bring some arty along.
Yeah, well, that's the right million dollar question....Epperaliant wrote: ↑Sat Mar 27, 2021 4:02 pm Also, I was wondering, while in defense, did you attack enemies when the opportunity arised?
Depends. I know it's hard not to, but every turn the enemy is busy doing something else but advancing, it's your win. Entrenchment wins. Some units have to be "sacrificed" for the greater good, but not in vain! Bunkers with AT-cover work wonders.
You can attack when you unit is moving or about to lose its position anyway - or if the defensive postion's not in immediate danger. A 10-entrenched unit can attack once, no problem - but then it should rest again, at least when playing on high difficulty levels...
-
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2018 12:26 pm
Re: Trouble in Batan defense
I was also thinking of exploiting the engineers "entrenchment aura" to fortify the positions faster.
-
- Lieutenant-General - Karl-Gerat 040
- Posts: 3700
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:24 pm
Re: Trouble in Batan defense
I did not here. Didn't motorize them and thus the retreat had to be planned rather carefully. But I did blow a couple of them bridges. And even had some RPs spared for a minefield. But yeah, you can use them that way.Epperaliant wrote: ↑Sat Mar 27, 2021 4:23 pm I was also thinking of exploiting the engineers "entrenchment aura" to fortify the positions faster.
PS: I do not like this difficulty setting. I'm not superstitious or something, but looking at "13" units makes me nervous. I like them numbers to be even....
-
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2018 12:26 pm
Re: Trouble in Batan defense
Yeah, I agree, I also fear that the game may end up being too easy.
Basing on your experience, would normal difficulty simply trivialize the game?
Basing on your experience, would normal difficulty simply trivialize the game?
-
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2018 12:26 pm
Re: Trouble in Batan defense
And so I restarted again on V difficulty, wonder how will it go.
Things are surely different.
For example, on Pearl Harbor I get zero casualties on core on III, but on V a 13p Zero fighter shaved 5 planes from my core in a single sudden and unavoidable strike.
AI is also hyper-aggressive because it knows it can win by attrition and happily engages my entrenched troops while even while attacking from rivers
Anyway I took a peek at other campaigns and bloody hell they look 100% impossible at V difficulty.
Hope this is not really going to be a "no fun allowed" mode.
Based on your experience, how worse it can get compared to Batan?
Things are surely different.
For example, on Pearl Harbor I get zero casualties on core on III, but on V a 13p Zero fighter shaved 5 planes from my core in a single sudden and unavoidable strike.
AI is also hyper-aggressive because it knows it can win by attrition and happily engages my entrenched troops while even while attacking from rivers
Anyway I took a peek at other campaigns and bloody hell they look 100% impossible at V difficulty.
Hope this is not really going to be a "no fun allowed" mode.
Based on your experience, how worse it can get compared to Batan?
-
- Lieutenant-General - Karl-Gerat 040
- Posts: 3700
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:24 pm
Re: Trouble in Batan defense
Personally I think that the first campaigns (US Pacific/Japan) are probably the easiest, you get a lot of turns and income.Epperaliant wrote: ↑Mon Mar 29, 2021 7:24 pm Anyway I took a peek at other campaigns and bloody hell they look 100% impossible at V difficulty.
Hope this is not really going to be a "no fun allowed" mode.
Based on your experience, how worse it can get compared to Batan?
(And I don't think this game is trivial even on middle difficulty, to be honest. Sure it gets easier once you've played and know the scens)
I'm replaying the US Pacific right now and had no trouble so far. Except the Guadalcanal scen maybe. It can be quite tricky to get all five sec. VPs (if you intend to stick to your orders, that is) and to down the five planes. Especially the planes. Because I need at least two, better three, torpedo bombers to deal with the three battleships later. Couldn't miss the 150RP reward for sinking each one of them, could I? On a sidenote: I was really mad when my whole fleet vanished at turn 5-ish, as I was on the winning side...
Another good example is the very first mission of WinterWar. Although the whole campaign is quite hard IMO, I'm still struggling (each time!) to achieve a "major victory" in the first scen of that campaign...
And if you really want to dive into a world of hurt, play the Endsieg DLC with a Sandstorm core on level5 difficulty....
-
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2018 12:26 pm
Re: Trouble in Batan defense
Ok maybe I'll just play on III and call it a day.
-
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2018 12:26 pm
Re: Trouble in Batan defense
So, I am further experimenting with difficulty, and since found the early scenarios to be really too easy on III, I restarted this mission on IV.
This time I made it, done all objectives and spent around 150 requisition to buy new stuff and reinforce units (mostly elite). I might need to make other repairs at the start of the next land scenario, but nothing dramatic, just some 7-8 strength infantry needing a little help...
Do you think this is decent as for performance goes for this kind of level?
I am really trying to gauge my performance to asses the final difficulty of choice and I need an expert's eye on this
This time I made it, done all objectives and spent around 150 requisition to buy new stuff and reinforce units (mostly elite). I might need to make other repairs at the start of the next land scenario, but nothing dramatic, just some 7-8 strength infantry needing a little help...
Do you think this is decent as for performance goes for this kind of level?
I am really trying to gauge my performance to asses the final difficulty of choice and I need an expert's eye on this
-
- Lieutenant-General - Karl-Gerat 040
- Posts: 3700
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:24 pm
Re: Trouble in Batan defense
Honestly I don't know how to answer this. It's not a contest, play it the way you enjoy the most. The only restriction I've made on myself was to never go lower than middle difficulty. (And never say never... ). That did not feel right with MY units being overstrength...like cheating without cheating...Epperaliant wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 7:23 pm I am really trying to gauge my performance to asses the final difficulty of choice and I need an expert's eye on this
I've played all stock DLCs multiple times, most of them on middle diff. first, then went higher after I've got better at playing and understanding the game and its mechanics, units files and... quirks. By now I have no problem playing all of the vanilla content - either the old ones or something new for the first time - on the highest diff. setting, partly because I know the rough "concept" of them already and parlty because they are targeted for casual players also. Some of the custom stuff can be really unbalanced when played on higher difficulty levels, for example.
So, if you don't have to replay one scen too many times or don't have to reload some turns (or whole batches of turns ) multiple times to "get it right" - or if you like it exactly that way - then I guess you've found the ideal difficulty setting for yourself...
PS: I wasn't kidding about the first scen of the WinterWar DLC, though. (You don't have to buy the DLC to play it.) If you can easily manage a major win on level4/5 diff., then you should be alright playing OoB that way.
PPS: Why "final difficulty"? You can switch between scens - and why not: some scens are harder than others