'Tanks, more tanks, Tovarish!' - Red Star Review and Discuss

Order of Battle is a series of operational WW2 games starting with the Pacific War and then on to Europe!

Moderators: Order of Battle Moderators, The Artistocrats

GabeKnight
Lieutenant-General - Karl-Gerat 040
Lieutenant-General - Karl-Gerat 040
Posts: 3700
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:24 pm

Re: 'Tanks, more tanks, Tovarish!' - Red Star Review and Discuss

Post by GabeKnight »

prestidigitation wrote: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:48 pm I'm not sure how you managed to pay for 2x high vet KV2 without being bankrupt.
But I was. Twice. :lol:
Somewhere mid-mission at Raseiniai and then again at Smolensk. So what? Doesn't mean that I have to resort to regular repairs then. Just wait a few turns and save the RPs until you can elite repair again.
Regular repairs are solely done to 5-star units with about 1HP damage (or in case of emergency :wink: )

Basically I would consider it bad play or would have made some stupid mistake if the KV2 unit takes more than 1-2HP damage per mission. Only unit I don't care about are recon planes. They get shot down regularly.
And sometimes I go with regular repairs for engineers, too. Although cheap, they suffer huge losses every time, whether they're attacking, being attacked or shot at with arty... :roll:
prestidigitation wrote: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:48 pm I'd love to see your orbat with that comp though.
Sorry, don't understand this part.
prestidigitation wrote: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:48 pm I generally see 6 damage on open terrain vs vet 3 tanks to standard infantry if unsupported, and 2 to 4 damage to the same infantry if on open ground. Maybe they take the same damage either way but it sure doesn't feel like it!
I get it, with them combat results being somewhat randomized, the huge infantry losses can vary from 2-6 HP sometimes.
But if you run some tests with the editor, one inf with AT support and one without, using the same attacking and defending units, both full HP and efficiency - you'll see. Same with planes.
WarHomer
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Posts: 395
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 12:12 pm

Re: 'Tanks, more tanks, Tovarish!' - Red Star Review and Discuss

Post by WarHomer »

I also use the KV-2 on the highest diff, but I´m also being careful not to suffer losses with it. I never attack with it, if the combat indicator is higher than 1, and rarely even then.

What I found cost me most were my 3 upgraded T-34. They are harder to keep safe, as the Germans attack them more often.
conboy
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1159
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2017 4:18 pm
Location: Lower Alabama

Re: 'Tanks, more tanks, Tovarish!' - Red Star Review and Discuss

Post by conboy »

Just finished Yelnya in a little better shape than I had hoped for. End of deployment phase and I still have 429 RPeez (and 6 air CeePeez that I hope I don't have to use -- bought two interceptors based on the mission brief).

Bought no aircraft and played with two mobile AA units.

Only 2 tanks (T-34s) above half-star vet level.

Lots of AT guns left over from previous battle.

Did okay -- beat the scenario on turn 18, most units basically intact. Ready for the next scenario. Still playing on Level 3 -- wonder if that's not my natural level. I was hoping it was level 4 but my last first-time through on the German side proved me wrong. Plenty of challenge for me playing on Level 3 -- it'll take some work to get to a better playing plateau.

My wife says it's better than trying to get to next level on the accordion.

conboy
bru888
Order of Battle Moderator
Order of Battle Moderator
Posts: 6184
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2016 5:39 pm
Location: United States

Re: 'Tanks, more tanks, Tovarish!' - Red Star Review and Discuss

Post by bru888 »

conboy wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 11:40 pmStill playing on Level 3 -- wonder if that's not my natural level. I was hoping it was level 4 but my last first-time through on the German side proved me wrong. Plenty of challenge for me playing on Level 3 -- it'll take some work to get to a better playing plateau.
I am in complete agreement with you on Level 3. It just feels like the level playing field. 1 and 2 are too easy, and 4 and 5, well, this is supposed to be a game. As a scenario-designer, you now know that the sweet spot is when the game could go either way when an average guy plays on medium difficulty. I must be average because sometimes I win and sometimes I lose on Level 3 and I am fine with that. Just my personal preference, of course.
conboy wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 11:40 pm My wife says it's better than trying to get to next level on the accordion.
I don't know. Tell her that you really have to put the squeeze on the Germans in Red Star in order to win. Heh. :)
- Bru
prestidigitation
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Posts: 374
Joined: Sat May 27, 2017 1:24 am

Re: 'Tanks, more tanks, Tovarish!' - Red Star Review and Discuss

Post by prestidigitation »

GabeKnight wrote: Tue Sep 03, 2019 6:16 pm
prestidigitation wrote: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:48 pm I'm not sure how you managed to pay for 2x high vet KV2 without being bankrupt.
But I was. Twice. :lol:
Somewhere mid-mission at Raseiniai and then again at Smolensk. So what? Doesn't mean that I have to resort to regular repairs then. Just wait a few turns and save the RPs until you can elite repair again.
Regular repairs are solely done to 5-star units with about 1HP damage (or in case of emergency :wink: )

Basically I would consider it bad play or would have made some stupid mistake if the KV2 unit takes more than 1-2HP damage per mission. Only unit I don't care about are recon planes. They get shot down regularly.
And sometimes I go with regular repairs for engineers, too. Although cheap, they suffer huge losses every time, whether they're attacking, being attacked or shot at with arty... :roll:
For my tastes in a campaign going bankrupt implies excessive risk. It also means I can't change up my comp if I want to experiment.

Orbat is roughly unit lineup.

I'll take your word for it on open ground supported vs unsupported by AT gun.
prestidigitation
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Posts: 374
Joined: Sat May 27, 2017 1:24 am

Re: 'Tanks, more tanks, Tovarish!' - Red Star Review and Discuss

Post by prestidigitation »

conboy wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 11:40 pm Just finished Yelnya in a little better shape than I had hoped for. End of deployment phase and I still have 429 RPeez (and 6 air CeePeez that I hope I don't have to use -- bought two interceptors based on the mission brief).

Bought no aircraft and played with two mobile AA units.

Only 2 tanks (T-34s) above half-star vet level.

Lots of AT guns left over from previous battle.

Did okay -- beat the scenario on turn 18, most units basically intact. Ready for the next scenario. Still playing on Level 3 -- wonder if that's not my natural level. I was hoping it was level 4 but my last first-time through on the German side proved me wrong. Plenty of challenge for me playing on Level 3 -- it'll take some work to get to a better playing plateau.

My wife says it's better than trying to get to next level on the accordion.

conboy
It's really more a matter of mindset (avoid taking damage on the attack, use terrain to avoid damage when defending) and using AT, AA and artillery to defend your units and defeat enemy high value units. Plus don't end turn on open ground if it can be avoided. If you click the little "i" button on the terrain picture it will tell you that combat outcomes are highly impacted by terrain. More cover and variation between attacker and defender combat stats is good defensive terrain. When I originally played the Brit campaign I had a rough time in some of the scenarios because I avoided jungle like crazy with my infantry. Big mistake as jungle is amazing defensive terrain. This go round I used SAS, humbers (sniper cleanup on jungle edge, running down 1 or 2 str units so they can't reinforce) and gurkas to own the jungle and used it to keep my infantry and AT safe.

Better play and use of supporting assets will result in more resources for elite reinforce, which results in substantially better combat outcomes. Eventually you find you're blowing through content that on the face of it seems like it should be hard, so you're left swapping to a higher difficulty.
conboy
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1159
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2017 4:18 pm
Location: Lower Alabama

Re: 'Tanks, more tanks, Tovarish!' - Red Star Review and Discuss

Post by conboy »

@Prestidigitation,
Excellent remarks, all true! Looks great on paper - takes time and effort (and retraining...) to put into practice.
I could use a little magic myself now and then.
I love the Humbers too, maybe best value of any allied unit.

keep awn keepen awwn,

conboy
bebro
Slitherine
Slitherine
Posts: 4344
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 12:50 pm

Re: 'Tanks, more tanks, Tovarish!' - Red Star Review and Discuss

Post by bebro »

Regarding the fighter/AA comments, AA are a good addition indeed, but I can also see objectives coming in future content that require ***fighters to be achieved....just sayin' ;)
conboy
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1159
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2017 4:18 pm
Location: Lower Alabama

Re: 'Tanks, more tanks, Tovarish!' - Red Star Review and Discuss

Post by conboy »

Prestidigitation said:
Orbat is roughly unit lineup.
I think it's short for Order of Battle -- unit list and command hierarchy. Presto - correct me if I am wrong.

conboy
prestidigitation
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Posts: 374
Joined: Sat May 27, 2017 1:24 am

Re: 'Tanks, more tanks, Tovarish!' - Red Star Review and Discuss

Post by prestidigitation »

bebro wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2019 1:44 pm Regarding the fighter/AA comments, AA are a good addition indeed, but I can also see objectives coming in future content that require ***fighters to be achieved....just sayin' ;)
I mean the obvious retort is that you're tracking who kills what based on last hit, so I can 12/13 it with AA and then finish with the fighter. Pretty much the same as today but with a reload if the AA accidentally gets the last hit.

It'd also virtually guarantee most players never get those air aces which is a bummer because they are pretty cool. Maybe damage inflicted but with a low maximum?

BTW, any chance you'll do more of the aces with unique bonus abilities? I loved the flexible movement Japanese ace and the British AOE bonus air ace (intended that he is AOE?). I'd also enjoy some more aoe ground commanders with unique abilities limited to particular unit types. A cavalry commander that boosted the cavalry to same tier infantry stats + gave supply stash would be really cool for example.
CoolDTA
Master Sergeant - U-boat
Master Sergeant - U-boat
Posts: 534
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2014 11:52 am

Re: 'Tanks, more tanks, Tovarish!' - Red Star Review and Discuss

Post by CoolDTA »

I'd think an objective like "fighters deal XX pts of damage to enemy aircraft" might be the one. It has been used before and then fighters are indeed a requirement.
impossible
Corporal - Strongpoint
Corporal - Strongpoint
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2019 11:02 pm

Re: 'Tanks, more tanks, Tovarish!' - Red Star Review and Discuss

Post by impossible »

WarHomer wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 11:05 am I also use the KV-2 on the highest diff, but I´m also being careful not to suffer losses with it. I never attack with it, if the combat indicator is higher than 1, and rarely even then.

What I found cost me most were my 3 upgraded T-34. They are harder to keep safe, as the Germans attack them more often.
yeah, in red star all we need is kv2. its stupidly OP for a number of reasons and because it rarely gets any serious damage its cheaper on a total cost basis than any other tanks in this game. it needs a massive nerf or a total limit to their numbers because it makes the soviet campaign a walk in the park. i never use elite replacements so i have tons of money to have all my tanks kv2.
bebro
Slitherine
Slitherine
Posts: 4344
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 12:50 pm

Re: 'Tanks, more tanks, Tovarish!' - Red Star Review and Discuss

Post by bebro »

prestidigitation wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2019 7:36 pm BTW, any chance you'll do more of the aces with unique bonus abilities? I loved the flexible movement Japanese ace and the British AOE bonus air ace (intended that he is AOE?). I'd also enjoy some more aoe ground commanders with unique abilities limited to particular unit types. A cavalry commander that boosted the cavalry to same tier infantry stats + gave supply stash would be really cool for example.
FWIW there will be an air cmdr with a small area effect, albeit not coming in too early during the 2nd DLC...
prestidigitation
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Posts: 374
Joined: Sat May 27, 2017 1:24 am

Re: 'Tanks, more tanks, Tovarish!' - Red Star Review and Discuss

Post by prestidigitation »

bebro wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2019 11:25 am
prestidigitation wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2019 7:36 pm BTW, any chance you'll do more of the aces with unique bonus abilities? I loved the flexible movement Japanese ace and the British AOE bonus air ace (intended that he is AOE?). I'd also enjoy some more aoe ground commanders with unique abilities limited to particular unit types. A cavalry commander that boosted the cavalry to same tier infantry stats + gave supply stash would be really cool for example.
FWIW there will be an air cmdr with a small area effect, albeit not coming in too early during the 2nd DLC...
Now that will be handy and neat! My only issue is that air unit positioning around a leader is awkward with a one hex limit because of movement after attack. It'd be great if the leader aura was two hex for convenience!

I know I have lots of capital T Thoughts but I can't stress enough how much I've enjoyed this particular DLC. Really is a best in class for the series.
GabeKnight
Lieutenant-General - Karl-Gerat 040
Lieutenant-General - Karl-Gerat 040
Posts: 3700
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:24 pm

Re: 'Tanks, more tanks, Tovarish!' - Red Star Review and Discuss

Post by GabeKnight »

18 turns? That's why I don't play - usually - on middle difficulty anymore... :wink: :lol:

Still loving this game...
Still loving this game...
Screenshot 315.jpg (985.71 KiB) Viewed 1343 times
prestidigitation
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Posts: 374
Joined: Sat May 27, 2017 1:24 am

Re: 'Tanks, more tanks, Tovarish!' - Red Star Review and Discuss

Post by prestidigitation »

Nice! And I totally agree with the “still loving this game” comment.
Post Reply

Return to “Order of Battle Series”