Turns - ?

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators

Post Reply
guthroth
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Posts: 119
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 9:16 am
Location: West London, England

Turns - ?

Post by guthroth »

Hi

Discussing last night we were left wondering why it is so much harder to turn through 180 degrees and move than it is to turn through 90 degrees and move.

Practical experience of moving large bodies of re-enactors about in period formations and costume comes down heavily in favour of it being no harder to turn to the rear and move off than to turn to the flank and move off. *

Indeed, if anything, moving to the flank is the harder of thr two, but FOG has it the opposite way round.

Could someone explain why the rules appear to contradict practical experience ?

Pete

* One of the discussers has commanded bodies of hundreds of Pike and Shot, the other similar sized groups of Vikings/Saxons.
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

A few reasons.

1. It doesn't appear to have happened often in actual battles (other than skirmishers) so you don't want it in the game.

2. 180 degree turns were by things like Laconian counter march which are rather pnderous.

3. It'd be crap for the game.
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
lawrenceg
Colonel - Ju 88A
Colonel - Ju 88A
Posts: 1536
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 6:24 pm
Location: Former British Empire

Post by lawrenceg »

You could argue that it would be more historical to make the turn and move possible, but make any BG that does it, or is within 3 MU of one that does it, take a cohesion test as if they had seen a BG break.

But it is quicker and simpler just to ban it. The result is the same.
Lawrence Greaves
david53
Major-General - Jagdtiger
Major-General - Jagdtiger
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 9:01 pm
Location: Manchester

Re: Turns - ?

Post by david53 »

guthroth wrote:Hi

Discussing last night we were left wondering why it is so much harder to turn through 180 degrees and move than it is to turn through 90 degrees and move.

Practical experience of moving large bodies of re-enactors about in period formations and costume comes down heavily in favour of it being no harder to turn to the rear and move off than to turn to the flank and move off. *

Indeed, if anything, moving to the flank is the harder of thr two, but FOG has it the opposite way round.

Could someone explain why the rules appear to contradict practical experience ?

Pete

* One of the discussers has commanded bodies of hundreds of Pike and Shot, the other similar sized groups of Vikings/Saxons.
But you can do it if your outside 6mu and got a general with you.
Robert241167
Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D
Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D
Posts: 1368
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 5:03 pm
Location: Leeds

Post by Robert241167 »

Only if your drilled Dave and I assume you would need a general with each BG if you wanted to turn each BG and move.

Undrilled may be a whole different proposition. Would you want to turn and move a BG not knowing if the next BG in line would be able to follow you?

Rob
gozerius
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1117
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:32 am

Post by gozerius »

Considering the number of times that a body of troops has been recorded to cause panic in surrounding troops for moving in retrograde, I would think it would be good to have the option in the game, with the same effects as seeing friends break for nearby BGs.
david53
Major-General - Jagdtiger
Major-General - Jagdtiger
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 9:01 pm
Location: Manchester

Post by david53 »

Robert241167 wrote:Only if your drilled Dave and I assume you would need a general with each BG if you wanted to turn each BG and move.

Undrilled may be a whole different proposition. Would you want to turn and move a BG not knowing if the next BG in line would be able to follow you?

Rob
With undrilled its a complex as you say and if you have a general the second move is stright forward.

But I can't see why you'd want to move like that at all.

I have done that with Cavalry but thats different.

Dave
Strategos69
Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D
Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D
Posts: 1375
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 10:53 pm
Location: Alcalá de Henares, Spain

Post by Strategos69 »

I think that Pete is just pointing out an incoherence based on his experience. And I think he is right. However, regarding the game experience, it seems to me that the main idea of easing 90 degrees comes to let victorious troops to exploit gaps in the main line. And making 180 turns more difficult avoids some players playing a phalanx as if it were a group of skirmishers.

In fact, reading about the battles on the sources, what we don't find many times is many manouvering before the battle. Most of the manouvering took place while deploying and that is not described (Arrians description of Issos is a good example). Both commanders tried, if possible, to extend their lines to match their ennemies and then both lines clashed. Something so simple sometimes is hard to be found in many AAR's. That's why I liked some deployment rules like the ones of the Ruleset Armati.
rogerg
Captain - Bf 110D
Captain - Bf 110D
Posts: 855
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 1:02 pm
Location: Halifax, Yorkshire

Post by rogerg »

A BG is meant to represent more than one unit. Quite possibly it is several lines of independent units. Not quite the same as one body all about facing.
Ghaznavid
1st Lieutenant - 15 cm sFH 18
1st Lieutenant - 15 cm sFH 18
Posts: 800
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 1:44 am
Location: Germany

Post by Ghaznavid »

Strategos69 wrote: In fact, reading about the battles on the sources, what we don't find many times is many manouvering before the battle. Most of the manouvering took place while deploying and that is not described (Arrians description of Issos is a good example). Both commanders tried, if possible, to extend their lines to match their ennemies and then both lines clashed. Something so simple sometimes is hard to be found in many AAR's. That's why I liked some deployment rules like the ones of the Ruleset Armati.
That applies mostly to classical battles though, less so to medievals and especially not to highly mobile mounted armies, like Turks, Mongols and so on.
Karsten


~ We are not surrounded, we are merely in a target rich environment. ~
bertalucci
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
Posts: 171
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 9:43 am

Post by bertalucci »

My view is leave well enough alone.
The current system is simple (this helps) and by deploying in 1/4's somewhat represents the commanders choices.
If one wants to replicate a more complicated process then that is between consenting adults and should be kept indoors.
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”