- LA charts a-c.png (114.15 KiB) Viewed 759 times
- LA charts d-f.png (118.1 KiB) Viewed 759 times
Moderator: Field of Glory 2 Tournaments Managers
I think you will find that players who can type,"I don't known about this terrain. I might wanna redo this" are fairly fluent in English. And it seems that they were already chatting.
stockwellpete wrote: ↑Sun Oct 24, 2021 7:52 amI hope it is not, because it is against the rule. Rule 4 is quite clear . . .mh5064 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 23, 2021 8:08 pm Hi,
player Lunarfoxx in Classical Antiquity, Division F invoking rule 4 has arbitrarily canceled the battle because it is unfavorable to him.("Rule 4 Match Players may agree to re-start a match within the first three turns if they believe the terrain is likely to produce a sterile match or a draw. The maximum number of re-starts permitted for a single match is two.")
Without having agreed on the thing and without having responded positively. I quote his exact words "I don't known about this terrain. I might wanna redo this" and then "I'll set up the new match. gonna redo it within the 3 turns cuz of terrain".
But the ground was fine for me and certainly would not have produced a drawn or sterile game.
He also benefits from having seen the composition of my army.
I wanted to ask a question about this:
Is this kind of attitude regular?
Thanks
Cheers
"Players may agree to re-start a match within the first three turns if they believe the terrain is likely to produce a sterile match or a draw. The maximum number of re-starts permitted for a single match is two."
The key word here is "agree". What I can do is pass the match to our adjudication panel, if you so wish. Please let me know.
If I can refer you to the last sentence of Rule 1 which states,mh5064 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 24, 2021 10:35 am I don't want anything and I don't like to win based on judgment.
I reported the event and I believe that the decision is up to the organizers not to the individual participant and I stick to their decisions.
I asked to know what the procedure was in case of violation of the rules.
But remember that if someone violates a rule and does not enforce it, I think this causes prejudice and creates an exception for the next time.
I wanted to clarify whether he had understood the English or not that lunarfoxx is from Rochester NY so...
I had also contacted him with a pm but no answer...
Cheers
Well I'll replay the match that's my decision!stockwellpete wrote: ↑Sun Oct 24, 2021 10:43 amIf I can refer you to the last sentence of Rule 1 which states,mh5064 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 24, 2021 10:35 am I don't want anything and I don't like to win based on judgment.
I reported the event and I believe that the decision is up to the organizers not to the individual participant and I stick to their decisions.
I asked to know what the procedure was in case of violation of the rules.
But remember that if someone violates a rule and does not enforce it, I think this causes prejudice and creates an exception for the next time.
I wanted to clarify whether he had understood the English or not that lunarfoxx is from Rochester NY so...
I had also contacted him with a pm but no answer...
Cheers
"Any eventuality not covered by these rules will be subject to adjudication by the organisers. The adjudication panel currently consists of ianiow (Ian), hidde (Anders) and stockwellpete (Pete)."
So if you feel that you are at a disadvantage in this newly set-up match then we can adjudicate. But you seem to be saying that you do not want to follow this route - "I don't want anything and I don't like to win based on judgment.", in which case you should continue with the match and I will explain the rule again to LunarFoxx, so there is no repetition.