No, I definitely do not want to go in that direction. How would you decide how many points to deduct for a particular ally?General Shapur wrote: ↑Sat Jun 15, 2019 2:57 am Actually, thats a good point. Perhaps an army taking allies can be handicapped by a number of points to make up for the added flexibility. Thus people may need to consider if that flexibility is worth it.
The Dustbin
Moderator: Field of Glory 2 Tournaments Managers
-
- Field of Glory Moderator
- Posts: 14500
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Re: Poll on new "Allies" feature
-
- Field of Glory Moderator
- Posts: 14500
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Re: Banter in the results threads . . .
Two other things have happened with regards banter since my original post on the subject. Firstly, one player has put 2 screenshots up, which is taking up an enormous amount of space. As a moderator I am able to edit posts but it is not possible for me to remove the second screenshot without also removing the first one. So please just stick to one screenshot please. Secondly, a losing player has posted a screenshot of his match so now there are 2 posts about the same match. I cannot have that I'm afraid as it messes up my counting as I scan up and down threads to make sure that I have got the tables right. So those sort of posts will disappear after 3 days or so.
-
- Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:05 am
- Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
dkalenda is back and killing Romans!
Is anyone currently playing dkalenda? If so please inform him he is close to forfeiting a game. He appears to have had forgotten he's playing me and is going to go over the 7 day period of no play. Dkalenda if you are out there I will give you another day to play or I will claim the game.
Cheers
Martin
Cheers
Martin
-
- Field of Glory Moderator
- Posts: 14500
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Re: Anyone seen dkalenda?
Yes, if you are going away for a week or so then you must let your opponents know otherwise they can claim the match under Rule 6.
Also, if you have received too many challenges to cope with at the start of the tournament then all you need to do is PM your opponent and tell them you will start the match as soon as you have a free slot. Please see the Players' Guide.
Also, if you have received too many challenges to cope with at the start of the tournament then all you need to do is PM your opponent and tell them you will start the match as soon as you have a free slot. Please see the Players' Guide.
-
- Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
- Posts: 403
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:25 pm
- Location: Perth, Australia
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division D
General Shapur - Kingdom of Soissons 461-486 AD defeats Rob123 - Romano-British 407-599 AD 52-21
Thanks for a good game.
General Shapur - Kingdom of Soissons 461-486 AD defeats Rob123 - Romano-British 407-599 AD 52-21
Thanks for a good game.
Previously - Pete AU (SSG)
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division B
devoncop (Jewish Revolt) agreed a 0-0 draw with Cunningcairn (Indian 320AD) as I wasn't coming out of a small forested area and he was equally determined not to come in !
(0-0)
devoncop (Jewish Revolt) agreed a 0-0 draw with Cunningcairn (Indian 320AD) as I wasn't coming out of a small forested area and he was equally determined not to come in !
(0-0)
-
- Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
- Posts: 403
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:25 pm
- Location: Perth, Australia
Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Div D
General Shapur -Indian %00 BC - 319 AD challenges
MikeMarchant - Roman 105-25 BC
KiFi - Macedonian 320-261 BC
Bluefin - Syracusan 280-211 BC
pas 4321
pm sent
General Shapur -Indian %00 BC - 319 AD challenges
MikeMarchant - Roman 105-25 BC
KiFi - Macedonian 320-261 BC
Bluefin - Syracusan 280-211 BC
pas 4321
pm sent
Previously - Pete AU (SSG)
-
- Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
- Posts: 403
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:25 pm
- Location: Perth, Australia
Re: Early Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Div C
General Shapur - Ghaznavid 962-1187 AD (no allies) challenges
batesmotel - Khorasanian 821-1003 AD (Dailami 928-1055 AD allies)
(6) desertedfox - Byzantine 988-1041 AD (no allies)
(10) deve - Dailami 928-1055 AD (Khorasanian 821-1003 AD allies)
password 4321
pm sent
General Shapur - Ghaznavid 962-1187 AD (no allies) challenges
batesmotel - Khorasanian 821-1003 AD (Dailami 928-1055 AD allies)
(6) desertedfox - Byzantine 988-1041 AD (no allies)
(10) deve - Dailami 928-1055 AD (Khorasanian 821-1003 AD allies)
password 4321
pm sent
Previously - Pete AU (SSG)
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division C
Dzon Vejn (Indians) beat cromlechi (Cartaghinian Hannibal in Africa) 45 - 18
Dzon Vejn (Indians) beat cromlechi (Cartaghinian Hannibal in Africa) 45 - 18
Re: Anyone seen dkalenda?
Yep, disappeared on me too.
-
- Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D
- Posts: 1203
- Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2019 3:06 pm
- Location: Virginia, USA
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here
Div B
Geffalrus (Polish and Vikings) defeats MorkinTheFree (Romano-British) 43-7
Morkin and I agreed at the start of the game, while we were wrapping up the Antigonid/Pyrrhic slugfest, to keep detailed notes of our thoughts and plans for each turn of the game. Which was a cool idea. The battle was shaping up to be a slow race between his warbands (could the kill my shieldwalls) and my Vikings (could they kill his subRomans) on opposite flanks, until my Polish cavalry spotted a flanking opportunity and exploited the below average morale of the SubRoman Foot to rout multiple units in a line. Condolences to my worthy opponent who saw entire sections of his battle line vanish in a horrific chain rout.
The confusing situation of a Polish army actually having quality infantry.
Geffalrus (Polish and Vikings) defeats MorkinTheFree (Romano-British) 43-7
Morkin and I agreed at the start of the game, while we were wrapping up the Antigonid/Pyrrhic slugfest, to keep detailed notes of our thoughts and plans for each turn of the game. Which was a cool idea. The battle was shaping up to be a slow race between his warbands (could the kill my shieldwalls) and my Vikings (could they kill his subRomans) on opposite flanks, until my Polish cavalry spotted a flanking opportunity and exploited the below average morale of the SubRoman Foot to rout multiple units in a line. Condolences to my worthy opponent who saw entire sections of his battle line vanish in a horrific chain rout.
The confusing situation of a Polish army actually having quality infantry.
We should all Stand With Ukraine.
-
- Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D
- Posts: 1203
- Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2019 3:06 pm
- Location: Virginia, USA
Re: Banter in the results threads . . .
Sorry! I'll restrain myself going forward.
We should all Stand With Ukraine.
-
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 6:56 pm
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division C
MorkinTheFree Pyrrhic 280-272 BC defeated DzonVejn - Indian 500 BC - 319 AD with score 46-10.
MorkinTheFree Pyrrhic 280-272 BC defeated DzonVejn - Indian 500 BC - 319 AD with score 46-10.
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division C
Doyley50 (Romans 24BC-196AD) beat Barrold713 (Numidian/Moorish 55BC-6AD) 60-51
(3-1)
Doyley50 (Romans 24BC-196AD) beat Barrold713 (Numidian/Moorish 55BC-6AD) 60-51
(3-1)
-
- Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
- Posts: 403
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:25 pm
- Location: Perth, Australia
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here
Division C
General Shapur - Ghaznavid 962-1187 AD (no allies) defeats KiFi - French 888-1049 AD (no allies) : 51 - 3
The french are met, caught in a deep stream facing elephants and grenadiers - KiFi, you are a good sport to press the advance in true impetuous French fashion.
General Shapur - Ghaznavid 962-1187 AD (no allies) defeats KiFi - French 888-1049 AD (no allies) : 51 - 3
The french are met, caught in a deep stream facing elephants and grenadiers - KiFi, you are a good sport to press the advance in true impetuous French fashion.
Previously - Pete AU (SSG)
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here
Division A
harveylh - Arab (Umayyad) 685-750 AD (no allies) defeats Cunningcairn - Viking 900-1049 AD (Irish ally), 41-8.
Dailami inf were too much for Viking Berserkers and a relatively open battlefield made the Arab Lancers even more effective. Tough map for the Vikings.
harveylh - Arab (Umayyad) 685-750 AD (no allies) defeats Cunningcairn - Viking 900-1049 AD (Irish ally), 41-8.
Dailami inf were too much for Viking Berserkers and a relatively open battlefield made the Arab Lancers even more effective. Tough map for the Vikings.
We should all Stand With Ukraine.
-
- Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
- Posts: 632
- Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 3:50 pm
- Location: Hampshire
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Hi folks
Late Antiquity Division B
(7) IMC - Roman 105-25 BC beat (5) Morbio - Ptolemaic 55-30 BC 69% to 37%
Thanks for the game. Closer than it looks.
IMC
Late Antiquity Division B
(7) IMC - Roman 105-25 BC beat (5) Morbio - Ptolemaic 55-30 BC 69% to 37%
Thanks for the game. Closer than it looks.
IMC
Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Division C
Doyley50 (Roman 24BC-196AD) challenges Bluefin (Frankish 496-561AD), pwd 1234, pm sent.
Doyley50 (Roman 24BC-196AD) challenges Bluefin (Frankish 496-561AD), pwd 1234, pm sent.
-
- Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
- Posts: 456
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2015 12:34 am
- Location: Michigan, U.S.A.
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Division D for Dynamic
Barrold713 (Pergamene) defeats KiFi (Macedonians) 50-20
Pachyderm Power!
Barrold713 (Pergamene) defeats KiFi (Macedonians) 50-20
Pachyderm Power!
Re: Early Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
DivisionC
Doyley 50 (Vikings 900-1049) challenges Kifi (French 888-1049),pwd 1234, pm sent.
Doyley 50 (Vikings 900-1049) challenges Kifi (French 888-1049),pwd 1234, pm sent.