The Dustbin

Moderator: Field of Glory 2 Tournaments Managers

stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 14500
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

Re: Biblical: arrange your matches here . . .

Post by stockwellpete »

Biblical                               A-B charts.jpg
Biblical A-B charts.jpg (632.49 KiB) Viewed 2419 times
Biblical                               C-D charts.jpg
Biblical C-D charts.jpg (524.38 KiB) Viewed 2419 times
stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 14500
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

Re: Poll on trialling the use of larger armies.

Post by stockwellpete »

I am going to let this poll run until next Sunday (March 24th), but I think we have got a pretty good idea now of how players feel. Normally in these sorts of polls we get around 30 players participating and we probably have got that already. Players have 2 votes and it is likely that 6 players have voted for both options 1 and 4 and maybe a few have voted for both 2 and 3. We seem to be split right down the middle with 17 not wishing to see a change and 16 in favour of some sort of trial. I think the 17 is a "harder" number because, as I say, some players may have voted for both option 2 and option 3. I also think the vote for option 4 is quite significant as it suggests around one-sixth of players would stop playing in the FOG2DL if larger armies were brought in across the board.

I think the most we can probably do, provided the trial is completed OK, is have one section each season with 1600pt armies. And we can rotate the larger armies through the sections as we proceed in subsequent seasons. Players who do not want to use the larger format will still have plenty of other options to choose from, because eventually we will have 6 sections in the tournament when the first medieval DLC is released.
melm
1st Lieutenant - 15 cm sFH 18
1st Lieutenant - 15 cm sFH 18
Posts: 820
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 9:07 pm

Re: Early Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .

Post by melm »

Div B

melm(Sassanid Persian 591-628 AD) vs Morbio(Lombard 493-567 AD)
PW:Morbio
PM sent.
Meditans ex luce mundi
garymann
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Posts: 79
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:15 am

Re: Early Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .

Post by garymann »

Div C

Desertfox can you check your PMs?
greekiraklis
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2013 6:11 pm

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by greekiraklis »

Division C

greekiraklis - Byzantine 493-550 AD beat MikeMUC - Roman 285-378 AD. 47-17. I won. Gg. Thanks for the battle !!
hidde
Brigadier-General - 8.8 cm Pak 43/41
Brigadier-General - 8.8 cm Pak 43/41
Posts: 1837
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 6:31 am

Re: Themed Event: winners post your results here . . .

Post by hidde »

1/4
FOG2DL-Themed Event,season4Semi-final.jpg
FOG2DL-Themed Event,season4Semi-final.jpg (244.02 KiB) Viewed 2200 times
Last edited by hidde on Mon Apr 01, 2019 7:59 am, edited 3 times in total.
youngr
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 466
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 8:10 am
Location: Presteigne

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by youngr »

Division B

youngr (Jewish) beat Trogilus (Roman) 60% v 51%

A very tough close game this one. The Romans were in a good defensive position and their heavy infantry put up one hell of a fight! That's my last game so thank you to all my worthy opponents.

Richard

(3-1)
phoyle3290
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2019 7:42 pm
Location: NC, USA

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by phoyle3290 »

Division D

phoyle3290 - Macedonians 320-261 BC defeated KiFi - Romans 105-25 BC 43-15

Thanks for the game! Good Luck to you in future matches.
phoyle3290
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2019 7:42 pm
Location: NC, USA

Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Post by phoyle3290 »

Division D

phoyle3290 - Macedonians 320-261 BC challenges Bluefin - Gallics 300-101 BC

password - Bluefin

pm sent

This is my last match to start for this section
stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 14500
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

youngr has won Late Antiquity Division B!

Post by stockwellpete »

With his close victory over Trogilus today (his eighth victory in total), youngr has won Late Antiquity Division B with his Jewish Revolt army. Well played Richard! :D
MikeC_81
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Posts: 937
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:28 am

Re: youngr has won Late Antiquity Division B!

Post by MikeC_81 »

And the Zealot mob claims another crown. Can't think of an army more dominant other than the Carthaginians.
Stratford Scramble Tournament

http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=494&t=99766&p=861093#p861093

FoG 2 Post Game Analysis Series on Youtube:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKmEROEwX2fgjoQLlQULhPg/
Triarii
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1171
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 4:58 pm

Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .

Post by Triarii »

Division A

Triarii - Arab (Bedouin) 300-636 AD beats GDod - Hepthalite 350-570 AD score 41-15.

Despite some intimidating poetry and alliteration the Arab horse took advantage of another open map to avoid the hepthalite hephalumps and cause distraction, disorder and dismay.
herm
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Posts: 87
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2017 7:12 am

Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Post by herm »

Div C

herm (romans) challenges :

Barrold713 (pontic)
lydianed (lydians)

PW sent.
devoncop
Sr. Colonel - Battleship
Sr. Colonel - Battleship
Posts: 1636
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:46 am

Re: youngr has won Late Antiquity Division B!

Post by devoncop »

Great job Youngr

Well deserved.

(But yes Mike...zealots seriously need a nerf :D )
Cunningcairn
Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
Posts: 1723
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:05 am
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand

Re: Poll on trialling the use of larger armies.

Post by Cunningcairn »

stockwellpete wrote: Sun Mar 17, 2019 10:44 am I am going to let this poll run until next Sunday (March 24th), but I think we have got a pretty good idea now of how players feel. Normally in these sorts of polls we get around 30 players participating and we probably have got that already. Players have 2 votes and it is likely that 6 players have voted for both options 1 and 4 and maybe a few have voted for both 2 and 3. We seem to be split right down the middle with 17 not wishing to see a change and 16 in favour of some sort of trial. I think the 17 is a "harder" number because, as I say, some players may have voted for both option 2 and option 3. I also think the vote for option 4 is quite significant as it suggests around one-sixth of players would stop playing in the FOG2DL if larger armies were brought in across the board.

I think the most we can probably do, provided the trial is completed OK, is have one section each season with 1600pt armies. And we can rotate the larger armies through the sections as we proceed in subsequent seasons. Players who do not want to use the larger format will still have plenty of other options to choose from, because eventually we will have 6 sections in the tournament when the first medieval DLC is released.
Pete do you think there is any significance in the number of players wanting to trial a larger army, not taking into account the specific army size, is currently 21 against 19 that want no change? If the question had been different and not specified 1600 or 2000 point armies you could say the majority would like a trial :D
stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 14500
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

Re: Poll on trialling the use of larger armies.

Post by stockwellpete »

Cunningcairn wrote: Sun Mar 17, 2019 10:36 pm Pete do you think there is any significance in the number of players wanting to trial a larger army, not taking into account the specific army size, is currently 21 against 19 that want no change? If the question had been different and not specified 1600 or 2000 point armies you could say the majority would like a trial :D
Yes, that's what I am saying. The vote is roughly 50-50 so that is enough to have a trial in one section next season (Season 5), but I think the current numbers mean that larger armies will not be rolled out right across the tournament in Season 6 even if the trial is successful (I expect it will work out just fine). There isn't the support for doing that so it is likely that, from Season 6 onwards, just one section each season will offer players the chance to use the larger 1600 pt armies. :wink:
MikeC_81
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Posts: 937
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:28 am

Re: youngr has won Late Antiquity Division B!

Post by MikeC_81 »

No, full marks for picking the best army. Even then it is not trivial. I remember when pbuck opened my eyes to this list during the KO tournament. I was reviewing the list before the game started and I was like.....51 point Legionaries...lol.
Stratford Scramble Tournament

http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=494&t=99766&p=861093#p861093

FoG 2 Post Game Analysis Series on Youtube:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKmEROEwX2fgjoQLlQULhPg/
SpeedyCM
Sergeant Major - Armoured Train
Sergeant Major - Armoured Train
Posts: 552
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 4:42 am
Location: Australia

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by SpeedyCM »

Division B

SpeedyCM (Sarmatian 350 BC - 24 AD) defeated Trogilus (Roman 197-284 AD) 40-3
ulysisgrunt
Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D
Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D
Posts: 1300
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 4:59 pm
Location: The California Central Coast Wine Country

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by ulysisgrunt »

Division C Result:

Ulysisgrunt (Germanic Horse Tribe) defeated Zardo02 (Sassanid Persian) 44 to13
rexhurley
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1130
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:33 am

Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Post by rexhurley »

Division A

rexhurley (Graeco Bactrian) challenges

dklanda Seleucid 166-125BC
nyzcar Greek 227-146BC
ruskicanuk Indo Greek 120-10 BC

Pw for all Finish
Post Reply

Return to “Field of Glory II Digital League”