Page 422 of 770

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2019 9:53 pm
by SawyerK
Division D

SawyerK (Ptolemaic 55-30 BC) defeated bomber23 (Ostrogoth 493-561 BC) by 66 to 37.

The Ptolemaics made good use of two connected hills in their initial defense and then was able to punch forward to the attack when the Ostrogoth cavalry thinned their line to circle the hills for flank attacks. The game was much closer than the final score as a Ptolemaic infantry unit somehow held off multiple attacks by two heavy Ostrogoth cavalry at the back of their army long enough for the forward attack to win through.

Re: The Allies poll is now closed , , , 21-7 in favour of their introduction next season.

Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2019 1:36 am
by Geffalrus
devoncop wrote:
Fri Jun 28, 2019 8:22 pm
Radical suggestion for a new category of Division :-)

I like it !
I'll second that. A completely random division where every player selects potluck at the start of the match would be kind of hilarious. Absolute chaos!

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2019 1:40 am
by Najanaja
Division C

Najanaja (Romans) vs Karvon (Achaemenid Persian) - drawn game 35- 31

(2-2)

Re: Themed Event arrange your matches here . . .

Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2019 1:44 am
by nyczar
Quarter-Final

nyczar vs rexhurley

Pydna mirror game all set up

PW rubicon

PM sent

Re: The Allies poll is now closed , , , 21-7 in favour of their introduction next season.

Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2019 2:39 am
by SnuggleBunnies
Well I meant 1 random army you stick with for a section. Still silly, but slightly less so.

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2019 3:00 am
by ruskicanuk
Division A

ruskicanuk - Romano-British 407-599 AD defeats klayeckles - Hepthalites 350-570 AD, 47 - 17, the amoeba swallowed a lot of horses

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2019 3:01 am
by ruskicanuk
Division A

ruskicanuk - Indo-Greeks 175-10 BC defeats Cunningcairn - Macedonian 328-321 BC, 41 - 15, sometimes ambushes work alright :-)

Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here

Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2019 3:01 am
by ruskicanuk
Division A

ruskicanuk - Breton 411-579 AD (no allies) defeats GDod - Ghaznavid 962-1187 AD (Turkish allies 600-1036 AD), 62 - 35, if you haven't played yet with GDod, you're missing out! Very entertaining match against Field of Glory II's finest poet!

Re: Early Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .

Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2019 3:13 am
by ruskicanuk
ruskicanuk - Breton 411-579 AD (no allies) challenges pantherboy - Indian (Hindu North) 600-1049 AD (Indian (Rajput) 650-1049 AD allies), password is "ruski". PM sent.
ruskicanuk - Breton 411-579 AD (no allies) challenges Triarii - Dailami 928-1055 AD (Arab (Syria/Iraq) 1009-1150 AD allies), password is "ruski". PM sent.

Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2019 3:14 am
by ruskicanuk
ruskicanuk - Romano-British 407-599 AD challenges Nosy_Rat - Hunnic Western 376-454 AD, password is "ruski". PM sent.
ruskicanuk - Romano-British 407-599 AD challenges nyczar - Scots-Irish 50 BC - 476 AD, password is "ruski". PM sent.

Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2019 3:14 am
by ruskicanuk
ruskicanuk - Indo-Greeks 175-10 BC challenges harveylh - Ptolemaic 166-56 BC, password is "ruski". PM sent.
ruskicanuk - Indo-Greeks 175-10 BC challenges klayeckles - Achaemenid Persian 419-329 BC, password is "ruski". PM sent.

Away From Digital League till Thursday

Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2019 3:56 am
by uneducated
Hello everybody!
Thank you for your challenges in the Digital League. I unfortunately will be unable to continue until 4th July (Thursday). I shall continue then as usual and hope this delay doesn't spoil fun!

Query . . .

Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2019 4:31 am
by devoncop
Division B

devoncop (Arkanian) beat Uneducated (Thracian) as no move received for over 7 days under game rules.

PM sent. Wrong section, wrong army, claim disallowed as uneducated had notified absence for a few days. (stockwellpete)

Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2019 6:03 am
by stockwellpete
Message for players in Division D

Uneducated will be unavailable until next Thursday, July 4th.

Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2019 6:04 am
by stockwellpete
Message for players in Division D

Uneducated will be unavailable until next Thursday, July 4th.

Re: Biblical: arrange your matches here . . .

Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2019 6:05 am
by stockwellpete
Message for players in Division B

Uneducated will be unavailable until next Thursday, July 4th.

The army selection poll is now closed . . . 20-5 in favour of limited exemptions

Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2019 6:32 am
by stockwellpete
Edited

The proposal

Where a nation has six or more armies in a tournament section list (e.g. Classical Antiquity), it is proposed that two different armies from these nations will be allowed in a division from Season 6 onwards. These are the nations that have 6 or more armies in a list that would be exempted from the current "one nation, one army" rule . . .

Classical Antiquity
Achaemenid Persian 6
Carthaginian 9
Greek 7
Thracian 10

This section edited to take into account the new army lists for Season 6 (Romans and Seleucids now removed from the exemption list as they have 5 armies instead of 6) and the omission of the Thracian group of armies from the original post. (stockwellpete)

Late Antiquity
Roman 6

This section edited to take into account the new army lists for Season 6. The Hunnic armies are removed from the exemption list as they now have 4 armies instead of 6. (stockwellpete)

Early Middle Ages
Arab 14
Byzantine 9

Biblical
N/A

Re: Biblical: arrange your matches here . . .

Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2019 7:51 am
by devoncop
Division B

devoncop (Arkanian) challenges uneducated (Hebrew)

Password : devoncop

PM sent

Chaos Division Idea

Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2019 7:52 am
by Karvon
Geffalrus wrote - A completely random division where every player selects potluck at the start of the match would be kind of hilarious. Absolute chaos!
I think this would be a very interesting option. At least a couple others seemed interested. Do we have enough people to make this viable? If you'd be willing to play in such a division, post here.

Karvon the Chaotic

Re: Chaos Division Idea

Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2019 8:01 am
by stockwellpete
Karvon wrote:
Sat Jun 29, 2019 7:52 am
Geffalrus wrote - A completely random division where every player selects potluck at the start of the match would be kind of hilarious. Absolute chaos!
I think this would be a very interesting option. At least a couple others seemed interested. Do we have enough people to make this viable? If you'd be willing to play in such a division, post here.

Karvon the Chaotic
This is not something that I would want for the FOG2DL, so it would have to be organised separately from what I provide here. :wink: