What is the size of scenario you prefer?
For me the standard Med scenario at 87x44 is the upper limit but I prefer smaller ones of around 30x30.
Yet many of the scenarios are far larger than the standard Med scenario and from the comments on this forum it seems that this
is not just the preference of those who write scenarios.
I'm curious as to why people like larger scenarios (and how you find the time to play such large scenarios to completion).
size of scenarios
Re: size of scenarios
I prefer the smaller scenarios as well.
This game is underrated, imo. So I need to get a review up on Steam now that I have had time to play it. Lots of depth beneath the surface and also on display. Excellent UI as far as I can tell.
I would gladly buy another era of war using this system. WW2 is obvious, but we have a lot of Grand Strategic choices right now, and good ones.
This game is underrated, imo. So I need to get a review up on Steam now that I have had time to play it. Lots of depth beneath the surface and also on display. Excellent UI as far as I can tell.
I would gladly buy another era of war using this system. WW2 is obvious, but we have a lot of Grand Strategic choices right now, and good ones.
Re: size of scenarios
Smaller means smaller than the campaign map?
We would definitely appreciate it, thank you!
Isnt WW2 a bit overplayed?
Re: size of scenarios
I agree, so I'd take any other era the devs might choose as workable with this system! Maybe a DLC.
Re: size of scenarios
There's a new game in the making. Imperiums Greek Wars. It focuses on the time period of Phillipp II of Macedon. I think it looks like a new and polished iteration following aggressors with one of the most detailed maps so far. Watch the intro video.