Page 2 of 2

Re: Errata for Errata v1.11

Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 8:13 am
by kevinj
Following this thread viewtopic.php?f=107&t=51062, some clarification would be appreciated on the meaning of "behind" for Field Fortifications and Obstacles when applying the -POA for shooting.

Re: Errata for Errata v1.11

Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 7:15 pm
by karakhanid
About the problem of the overprized determined horse, why not classify the steady melee pistol as shot?
Mikel

Re: Errata for Errata v1.11

Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 8:45 pm
by ravenflight
karakhanid wrote:About the problem of the overprized determined horse, why not classify the steady melee pistol as shot?
Mikel
I don't think this is a good idea. It would mean that sword armed shock cavalry like the Poles would be even more disadvantaged against shooting pistol horse AND troops like heavily armoured cuirassier horse would also lose their advantage against the same.

Re: Errata for Errata v1.11

Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2016 11:02 am
by timmy1
Minor item I know but...

Colonies and Conquest, Page 41. Troop Notes, 2nd paragraph. 'In 1590' should read 'in 1690' not least because the Qing empire did not exist at the earlier date and Galdan from all that I know was not born until smetime oafter 1640 AD. It would also match what the list says.

Re: Errata for Errata v1.11

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2016 9:46 am
by madlemmey
How many TC can Confederate Irish in Wars Of aReligion have? :?: appears to be missing from my version of the book.

Re: Errata for Errata v1.11

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2016 10:00 am
by timmy1
Errata Version 1.10, page 11 states: FC should read 0-2, TC should read 0-3.

Re: Errata for Errata v1.11

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2016 12:42 pm
by madlemmey
Thank you