List Errata
Moderators: terrys, hammy, philqw78, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design
-
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
- Posts: 8815
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
List Errata
Whare the territory types for Warring States Chinese? It mentions Western Han only
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
-
- Field of Glory Moderator
- Posts: 10287
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
- Location: LarryWorld
Re: List Errata
Agricultural, Developed and Hilly would be a good bet.
Nik Gaukroger
"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith
nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith
nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
-
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
- Posts: 8815
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
Re: List Errata
Not until official
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
-
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
- Posts: 3101
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
- Location: Fareham, UK
Re: List Errata
I now have a copy of the new lists. There is much in there to like but there are also quite a few errors. When can we expect to see an errata for the lists please?
As an aside - where did the Cataphract Camels go?
As an aside - where did the Cataphract Camels go?
Pete
-
- Field of Glory Moderator
- Posts: 10287
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
- Location: LarryWorld
Re: List Errata
No idea, but might it not be a good idea to flag any possible errors here so that Terry et al are aware of them?petedalby wrote:I now have a copy of the new lists. There is much in there to like but there are also quite a few errors. When can we expect to see an errata for the lists please?
Fairly sure they should have been in there. They were missed out in the initial draft but Terry noted it and I thought was going to put a single BG of them in - maybe as a special campaign for 217 AD.As an aside - where did the Cataphract Camels go?
Nik Gaukroger
"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith
nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith
nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
Re: List Errata
They should have been in the Parthian list - I'll be looking to publish an errata next week which will cover any errors and add these to the Parthians.As an aside - where did the Cataphract Camels go?
Fairly sure they should have been in there. They were missed out in the initial draft but Terry noted it and I thought was going to put a single BG of them in - maybe as a special campaign for 217 AD.
-
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
- Posts: 3057
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am
Re: List Errata
Having just done some proof reading on book 2 I was finding that I was missing errors on the first couple of run throughs. It would be a good idea perhaps to jot the book 1 issues down here as they are spotted.petedalby wrote:I now have a copy of the new lists. There is much in there to like but there are also quite a few errors. When can we expect to see an errata for the lists please?
-
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
- Posts: 3101
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
- Location: Fareham, UK
Re: List Errata
No problem. Early spots:
Thracian - Roman option - should be 46AD
Later Carthaginian - Balearic slingers - presumably should be Unprotected?
Ancient Spanish - Legionaries - presumably should be Armoured?
Thracian - Roman option - should be 46AD
Later Carthaginian - Balearic slingers - presumably should be Unprotected?
Ancient Spanish - Legionaries - presumably should be Armoured?
Pete
Re: List Errata
Terry already has mine for the EAP saka cav which should be 4-6.
The LAP levies and scythed chariots which have no quality.
The Parthian light horse total bases which should be 8 not 16.
None of which I picked up in the proof reading, although the last one was over two pages in our half hearted defence
Steve
The LAP levies and scythed chariots which have no quality.
The Parthian light horse total bases which should be 8 not 16.
None of which I picked up in the proof reading, although the last one was over two pages in our half hearted defence
Steve
-
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
- Posts: 3101
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
- Location: Fareham, UK
Re: List Errata
Elephants may be in 3 base BGs if so specified. I can only find Classical Indian with 2-3 bases as an option. Just wanted to check that was the only intended list in book 1. It would be an easy thing to miss.
Pete
Re: List Errata
That list is the only one in this book that has 2-3 bases. That are quite a few in Book 2.Elephants may be in 3 base BGs if so specified. I can only find Classical Indian with 2-3 bases as an option. Just wanted to check that was the only intended list in book 1. It would be an easy thing to miss.
-
- Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
- Posts: 2048
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 7:29 pm
- Location: Manotick, Ontario, Canada
Re: List Errata
Early Carthaginian:
Total Bases for Poeni / Campanian / Etruscan / Greek cavalry = 0-8 bases
Total Bases for Numidian light cavalry = 0-6 bases
Total Bases for all of the above = 4-16 bases
Should the Total Bases for Numidian light cavalry be 0-8 bases? Or the Total Bases for all Core cavalry be 4-14 bases? Or something else?
Total Bases for Poeni / Campanian / Etruscan / Greek cavalry = 0-8 bases
Total Bases for Numidian light cavalry = 0-6 bases
Total Bases for all of the above = 4-16 bases
Should the Total Bases for Numidian light cavalry be 0-8 bases? Or the Total Bases for all Core cavalry be 4-14 bases? Or something else?
-
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
- Posts: 3057
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am
Re: List Errata
Thanks, have flagged it to Terry.shadowdragon wrote:Early Carthaginian:
Total Bases for Poeni / Campanian / Etruscan / Greek cavalry = 0-8 bases
Total Bases for Numidian light cavalry = 0-6 bases
Total Bases for all of the above = 4-16 bases
Should the Total Bases for Numidian light cavalry be 0-8 bases? Or the Total Bases for all Core cavalry be 4-14 bases? Or something else?
-
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
- Posts: 3002
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 5:15 am
- Location: London, UK
- Contact:
Re: List Errata
Current version of the list errata now up on the bhgs website
http://www.madaxeman.com
Holiday in Devon? Try https://www.thecaptainscottagebrixham.com
Holiday in Devon? Try https://www.thecaptainscottagebrixham.com
-
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
- Posts: 3101
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
- Location: Fareham, UK
Re: List Errata
Sadly I think the errata needs an errata:
Page 65: TABLE "EARLY CARTHAGINIAN" Numidian light cavalry - "Total bases" - REPLACE "4-6" with "4-8"
Surely we replace 0-6 with 4-8.
Page 65: TABLE "EARLY CARTHAGINIAN" Numidian light cavalry - "Total bases" - REPLACE "4-6" with "4-8"
Surely we replace 0-6 with 4-8.
Pete
-
- Field of Glory Moderator
- Posts: 10287
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
- Location: LarryWorld
Re: List Errata
"Inevitably" would be a better wordpetedalby wrote:Sadly
Nik Gaukroger
"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith
nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith
nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
Re: List Errata
I did notice that immediately after I sent the errata to Tim - However, he's more efficient than I am and posted it before I let him know !!!Page 65: TABLE "EARLY CARTHAGINIAN" Numidian light cavalry - "Total bases" - REPLACE "4-6" with "4-8"
Surely we replace 0-6 with 4-8.
-
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
- Posts: 3101
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
- Location: Fareham, UK
Re: List Errata
Page 48 - Thracian
Veteran cavalry are described as protected but are costed as armoured. I suspect they should indeed be armoured.
I see an internal ally is compulsory. Similar lists that can have an internal ally - Classical Indian / Gallic - have the proviso that the internal ally bases are deducted from the minima and maxima of the main list. This is missing here. Deliberate or missed?
Please clarify.
Veteran cavalry are described as protected but are costed as armoured. I suspect they should indeed be armoured.
I see an internal ally is compulsory. Similar lists that can have an internal ally - Classical Indian / Gallic - have the proviso that the internal ally bases are deducted from the minima and maxima of the main list. This is missing here. Deliberate or missed?
Please clarify.
Pete
Re: List Errata
Yes, they should be armoured.Veteran cavalry are described as protected but are costed as armoured. I suspect they should indeed be armoured.
Definitely missed. I'm not sure what difference it makes, but I'll add that statement to the next Book 1 errata to be released.I see an internal ally is compulsory. Similar lists that can have an internal ally - Classical Indian / Gallic - have the proviso that the internal ally bases are deducted from the minima and maxima of the main list. This is missing here. Deliberate or missed?