The Dustbin

Moderator: Field of Glory 2 Tournaments Managers

Geffalrus
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 722
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2019 3:06 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Post by Geffalrus » Sun Jun 16, 2019 11:52 am

Div B

Geffalrus (Palmyrans) challenges:

IMC - Roman 105-25 BC
XLegione - Hunnic Sabir 463-558 AD

PW is themed

PM to be sent.

Tresantes
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:16 pm

Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Post by Tresantes » Sun Jun 16, 2019 12:01 pm

Div D

Tresantes (Pyrrhic) challenges Barold713 (Pergamene)
Pw is perg

ulysisgrunt
Major - 8.8 cm FlaK 36
Major - 8.8 cm FlaK 36
Posts: 951
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 4:59 pm
Location: The California Central Coast Wine Country

Re: Poll on new "Allies" feature

Post by ulysisgrunt » Sun Jun 16, 2019 2:37 pm

I think that allies should be allowed in all games, as this would make many armies more competitive. However, I feel that they should be accompanied by an allied general who can command only them. This would be a reasonable trade off. Allied troops should certainly not be scattered across the line.

batesmotel
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 3457
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:52 pm

Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here

Post by batesmotel » Sun Jun 16, 2019 3:22 pm

Division C

batesmotel (Khorasan w Dailami allies) beat Ulysisgrunt (Khazar) 59%-22%

Thanks for the game.

Chris
....where life is beautiful all the time

devoncop
Colonel - Fallschirmjäger
Colonel - Fallschirmjäger
Posts: 1403
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:46 am

Re: Poll on new "Allies" feature

Post by devoncop » Sun Jun 16, 2019 3:49 pm

Ulysisgrunt wrote:
Sun Jun 16, 2019 2:37 pm
I think that allies should be allowed in all games, as this would make many armies more competitive. However, I feel that they should be accompanied by an allied general who can command only them. This would be a reasonable trade off. Allied troops should certainly not be scattered across the line.

The specific General would require a change of software as it is not possible at the moment.

devoncop
Colonel - Fallschirmjäger
Colonel - Fallschirmjäger
Posts: 1403
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:46 am

Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .

Post by devoncop » Sun Jun 16, 2019 4:25 pm

Division B

devoncop (Arkanians) beat Barrold713 (Corinthian 550) 47% to 12%

Many thanks to my opponent who was disadvantaged in losing a race to some dominating small hills along the front.

MorkinTheFree
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 6:56 pm

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by MorkinTheFree » Sun Jun 16, 2019 4:43 pm

Division C

MorkinTheFree Pyrrhic 280-272 BC defeated lydianed - Gallic 300-101 BC with score 62-44.

youngr
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 463
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 8:10 am
Location: Presteigne

Re: Anyone seen dkalenda?

Post by youngr » Sun Jun 16, 2019 5:20 pm

He's back and thrashing my Romans.....

youngr
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 463
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 8:10 am
Location: Presteigne

Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Post by youngr » Sun Jun 16, 2019 5:58 pm

Division A

youngr (Roman) challenges Triarii (Carthaginian)

youngr (Roman) challenges harveylh (Ptolemaic)

Password is "elephant". PM sent.

stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 11713
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

The first Time Control check is next Sunday June 23rd . . .

Post by stockwellpete » Sun Jun 16, 2019 6:14 pm

Most of you know the drill by now. :wink:

For those that don't, or have forgotten, please see Rule 3 . . .

"Players must register one result in each section they have entered within three weeks, and three results within each section they have entered within five weeks (i.e. the halfway stage) of the opening of the tournament or they may be replaced by a player from the reserve list."

So, that means that everyone should have completed one match in each section by next Sunday. However, the Early Middle Ages section is exempt from the first Time Control check as it started a week later than everything else. And players who have entered the Themed Event are given extra leeway as they have to play all their qualifying group matches in the first 4 weeks of competition. You can see the current situation in each section from the new league tables published today.

The main purpose of this first check is to identify any definite non-starters.

To give a couple of examples of how I implement this - if a player has entered 3 sections, including the Themed Event, and by next Sunday he has registered 2 results in the Themed Event, 2 results in one of the other sections, and 0 results in the third section (but he has matches under way) - then he is going to be fine. He has entered 3 sections and I have 4 results so he has got himself going in the tournament. If, on the other hand, I have a player who has entered 3 sections and has only produced 1 result and has not started matches in one of the other 2 sections - then that player is going to be unlucky and he will lose one of his sections to a reserve.

If there are any questions about this please post them in this thread.

MorkinTheFree
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 6:56 pm

Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here

Post by MorkinTheFree » Sun Jun 16, 2019 8:35 pm

Division B: MorkinTheFree (Romano-British 407-599 AD) defeated youngr - Sassanid Persian 591-628 AD (no allies) with score 51-22.
Division B: MorkinTheFree (Romano-British 407-599 AD) defeated IMC - Viking (Ireland) 900-1049 AD (no allies) with score 40-0. Very sick score.

dkalenda
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Posts: 232
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 4:49 pm

Re: dkalenda is back and killing Romans!

Post by dkalenda » Sun Jun 16, 2019 10:04 pm

Sorry guys... I though I could play once, twice more..., now I'm active back.

Geffalrus
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 722
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2019 3:06 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by Geffalrus » Sun Jun 16, 2019 10:11 pm

Division B

Geffalrus (Palmyra) defeated DzonVejn (Bretons) 40-13. Good game to my opponent.

The Bretons went heavy with the cavalry and skirmishers, with a small force of Breton foot to back them up. Their position on the hill was strong, but I finally found a good use for my massed archers. Protected by armored Cataphracts and Legions, the Palmyran bowmen steadily chipped away at the Breton forces. The Bretons tried a wide flanking ride by the heavy cavalry, but that left the Breton foot exposed, and the armored might of Palmyra rolled forward to victory.

The Palmyrans take the hill, and the win.
Screen_00000179.jpg
Screen_00000179.jpg (498.51 KiB) Viewed 1191 times

Cunningcairn
Colonel - Fallschirmjäger
Colonel - Fallschirmjäger
Posts: 1454
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:05 am
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by Cunningcairn » Sun Jun 16, 2019 10:14 pm

Div B

Cunningcairn - Indian 320-545 AD beat DzonVejn - Breton 411-579 AD by 41% - 11%

Morbio
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Posts: 2091
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:40 pm
Location: Wokingham, UK

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by Morbio » Sun Jun 16, 2019 10:32 pm

Div B

Morbio (Ptolemaic 55-30 BC) beat Cunningcairn (Indian 320-545 AD) 48 - 6

Morbio
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Posts: 2091
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:40 pm
Location: Wokingham, UK

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by Morbio » Sun Jun 16, 2019 10:34 pm

Div B

Morbio (Ptolemaic 55-30 BC) beat Geffalrus (Palmyran 258-273 AD) 14-4

Palmyrans surrendered

SnuggleBunnies
Colonel - Fallschirmjäger
Colonel - Fallschirmjäger
Posts: 1425
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2015 2:09 am

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by SnuggleBunnies » Sun Jun 16, 2019 10:37 pm

Division A

SnuggleBunnies (Kingdom of Soissons) defeats harveylh (City Arabs) 58-32

GG. A vicious back and forth match dominated by the mountainous terrain.
SnuggleBunny's Field of Glory II / Pike and Shot / Sengoku Jidai MP Channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjUQy6dEqR53NwoGgjxixLg

Supervark
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Posts: 214
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 3:24 am

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by Supervark » Sun Jun 16, 2019 11:19 pm

Division D

Supervark (Lombards) beat Sawyerk (Ptolemaic) 51%-13%

The Ptolemaic army occupied a series of hills but the Lombards were fortunate to kill off most of their light troops very early on and surround them on three sides. So the Lombard lights had no opposition and proceeded to whittle down on those pike phalanxes and other troops. Finally, they overextended their army and were gradually picked off by the mounted troops. Not an easy battle and could have gone either way up until the last 3-4 turns. GG

desertedfox
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 290
Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 1:07 pm

Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .

Post by desertedfox » Mon Jun 17, 2019 12:33 am

Div B

desertedfox - Egyptian 570-525 BC defeated Barrold713 - Corinthian 550-461 BC 49 - 24

Thx for a gg. The raw archers performed beyond expectation.

ruskicanuk
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Posts: 208
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 4:18 am

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by ruskicanuk » Mon Jun 17, 2019 12:49 am

Div A
ruskicanuk - Romano-British 407-599 AD defeats Snugglebunnies - Kingdom of Soissons 461-486 AD, 57 - 24, wide-front crash ultimately served the Romano-British

Post Reply

Return to “Field of Glory II Digital League”