The Dustbin

Moderator: Field of Glory 2 Tournaments Managers

rexhurley
Major - Jagdpanther
Major - Jagdpanther
Posts: 1036
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:33 am

Re: Themed Event: winners post your results here . . .

Post by rexhurley » Tue Jul 09, 2019 12:45 am

Match 4

Pydna

rexhurley (Romans) defeats nyczar 52/17 a lot harder fought than the score lines indicate as I had a lot of units and a left flank in tatters but once my elephant went rampaging around in the back and my my right flank cav got into the back of units its fell apart form nyczar.

Thank you for quite a challenging game, quite like nyczar will get his revenge in the mirror as I only have a centre left at this stage

rexhurley
Major - Jagdpanther
Major - Jagdpanther
Posts: 1036
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:33 am

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by rexhurley » Tue Jul 09, 2019 3:03 am

Division B

rexhurley (Numdians) beat Geffalrus (Palmyran) 64/44 An early lead and heroic rolling by Geffalrus put the pressure on, the game then swayed back and forth to the point where we thought we would salvage a draw with 3 turns to play then I finally nailed him

GG Geffalrus

stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 11866
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by stockwellpete » Tue Jul 09, 2019 7:12 am

Classical Antiquity            A-D tables.jpg
Classical Antiquity A-D tables.jpg (937.4 KiB) Viewed 1366 times

stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 11866
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Post by stockwellpete » Tue Jul 09, 2019 7:44 am

Classical Antiquity A-B charts.jpg
Classical Antiquity A-B charts.jpg (739.97 KiB) Viewed 1198 times
Classical Antiquity C-D charts.jpg
Classical Antiquity C-D charts.jpg (796.2 KiB) Viewed 1198 times

stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 11866
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by stockwellpete » Tue Jul 09, 2019 7:51 am

Late Antiquity                   A-D tables.jpg
Late Antiquity A-D tables.jpg (936.46 KiB) Viewed 1153 times

youngr
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 463
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 8:10 am
Location: Presteigne

Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here

Post by youngr » Tue Jul 09, 2019 8:02 am

Division B

youngr (Persians) beat sunnyboy (Byzantine) 40-15

Fartoo many elephants got in amongst the Byzantine cavalry with horrific results

stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 11866
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Post by stockwellpete » Tue Jul 09, 2019 8:16 am

Late Antiquity A-B charts.jpg
Late Antiquity A-B charts.jpg (746.48 KiB) Viewed 1031 times
Late Antiquity C-D charts.jpg
Late Antiquity C-D charts.jpg (775.47 KiB) Viewed 1031 times
Attachments
Late Antiquity                   A-D tables.jpg
Late Antiquity A-D tables.jpg (936.46 KiB) Viewed 1032 times

stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 11866
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here

Post by stockwellpete » Tue Jul 09, 2019 8:17 am

Early Middle Ages             A-D Tables.jpg
Early Middle Ages A-D Tables.jpg (730.62 KiB) Viewed 1323 times

stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 11866
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

Re: Early Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .

Post by stockwellpete » Tue Jul 09, 2019 8:38 am

Early Middle Ages            A-B charts.jpg
Early Middle Ages A-B charts.jpg (661.86 KiB) Viewed 1058 times
Early Middle Ages            C-D charts.jpg
Early Middle Ages C-D charts.jpg (535.26 KiB) Viewed 1058 times

stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 11866
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .

Post by stockwellpete » Tue Jul 09, 2019 8:59 am

Biblical                               A-D tables.jpg
Biblical A-D tables.jpg (619.04 KiB) Viewed 1119 times

stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 11866
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

Re: Biblical: arrange your matches here . . .

Post by stockwellpete » Tue Jul 09, 2019 8:59 am

Biblical A-B charts.jpg
Biblical A-B charts.jpg (667.77 KiB) Viewed 1061 times

stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 11866
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

MorkinTheFree has won Classical Antiquity Division C!

Post by stockwellpete » Tue Jul 09, 2019 9:02 am

With 7 wins and 2 draws MorkinTheFree has won automatic promotion with his Pyrrhic army. Well played! :D

nyczar
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Posts: 412
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:04 am

Re: Themed Event: winners post your results here . . .

Post by nyczar » Tue Jul 09, 2019 12:23 pm

Match 4

Pydna

nyczar (Romans) defeats rexhurley (Macedonia) in the revenge match but not as convincingly 61-38. GG

rexhurley goes through to the semi-finals 35-23 on the tiebreaker after 1-1 draw. He will play either deve or Geffalrus.

paulmcneil
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Posts: 625
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:07 pm
Location: Winchester, UK
Contact:

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Post by paulmcneil » Tue Jul 09, 2019 12:58 pm

Div C

Paulmcneil Thracians drew with Karvon Persians 54:55 game ran out of time

(2-2)
Paul McNeil

sunnyboy
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
Posts: 151
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2018 12:16 pm
Location: Australia

Re: MorkinTheFree has won Classical Antiquity Division C!

Post by sunnyboy » Tue Jul 09, 2019 2:24 pm

Congratulations on the win Morkin, well done!

stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 11866
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm

The poll on player army choices is now closed . . . 23-20 in favour of no change

Post by stockwellpete » Tue Jul 09, 2019 5:06 pm

Towards the end of our discussion in the thread (with a poll) about the new allies feature, pantherboy wrote this about the way he used to organise the League of Extraordinary Gentlemen (LOEG) back in the days of FOG1 . . .

"Each season players are not allowed to reselect an army list they have chosen in a previous season until they have played 5 different lists with each list originating from a different nation. I wish to encourage variety within the league and broaden players play styles."

I am wondering whether enough players feel that a similar approach is preferable for the FOG2DL? While I have no intention at all of checking back through five seasons to make sure players are choosing different armies, we could have a much simpler rule that says that players must pick an army from a different nation each season in each tournament section that they enter. So that would mean a player having a particular fondness for, say, the Romano-British or Jewish Revolt armies, could only have the chance to play with them in the tournament every second season, and not in consecutive seasons as at present. I have already adjusted the army lists so that no army is available in more than one tournament section so that players cannot use the same army twice in the same season.

There are probably a few anomalous armies such as the Diadochi group that should be specified as one "nation" for the purpose of this rule. Please suggest any other candidates for this designation.

The poll will run for 10 days and you may change your vote at any time.

CLARIFICATION

JUST IN CASE THERE IS ANY CONFUSION - ALL THAT IS BEING PROPOSED IS THAT IF YOU USE AN ARMY IN ONE SEASON THEN YOU CANNOT USE IT AGAIN IN THE NEXT SEASON.

paulmcneil
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Posts: 625
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:07 pm
Location: Winchester, UK
Contact:

Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Post by paulmcneil » Tue Jul 09, 2019 6:32 pm

Div C

paulmcneil challenge for Barold713

pw=Barold713
Paul McNeil

XLegione
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 277
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2017 7:54 pm
Location: Italy

Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .

Post by XLegione » Tue Jul 09, 2019 6:50 pm

Division A

XLegione - Carthaginian 550-411 BC defeated Morbio - Assyrian 681-609 BC 48% - 16%

Geffalrus
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 722
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2019 3:06 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Re: Poll on player army choices restriction

Post by Geffalrus » Tue Jul 09, 2019 8:15 pm

I feel that the priority order of picking (lowest rank to highest within a division) already works to limit the ability of players to ride a single army to victory. The better the army list, the more likely someone else is to pick it ahead of you the higher ranked you are.

I also think players are more likely to pick new armies the more the play and the more bored with one approach they get. Honestly, I just don't see the advantage in not allowing people the freedom to stick with an army they like.

The only reason I play Classical is to take my favorite pike army through a tournament. If that's off the table due to rules (rather than an increase in their popularity), then I'll be less interested in participating in that division. At some point I'll get bored and experiment, but that's not gonna happen for a few seasons.

devoncop
Colonel - Fallschirmjäger
Colonel - Fallschirmjäger
Posts: 1403
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:46 am

Re: Poll on player army choices restriction

Post by devoncop » Tue Jul 09, 2019 8:20 pm

Geffalrus wrote:
Tue Jul 09, 2019 8:15 pm
I feel that the priority order of picking (lowest rank to highest within a division) already works to limit the ability of players to ride a single army to victory. The better the army list, the more likely someone else is to pick it ahead of you the higher ranked you are.

I also think players are more likely to pick new armies the more the play and the more bored with one approach they get. Honestly, I just don't see the advantage in not allowing people the freedom to stick with an army they like.

The only reason I play Classical is to take my favorite pike army through a tournament. If that's off the table due to rules (rather than an increase in their popularity), then I'll be less interested in participating in that division. At some point I'll get bored and experiment, but that's not gonna happen for a few seasons.
Agree fully with the above.

Post Reply

Return to “Field of Glory II Digital League”